Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Morphometric analysis of debris flows basins in the Eastern Rhodopes (Bulgaria) using geospatial technologies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Debris flows are considered as a rapid movement of highly water-saturated colluvial and proluvial deposits. Besides the intensive rainfall and snowmelt, there are several other factors—prerequisites to debris flows: morphometric characteristics, rocks composition, active tectonics and deforestation. The current research is directed to the analysis of morphometric parameters of debris flow areas located in Eastern Rhodopes (Bulgaria). Two types of debris flows are analysed—gully-induced debris flows and stream torrent section with debris flood occurrence. The aim is to determine morphometric indicators to be used for discrimination of debris flow types and further susceptibility assessment. The following parameters are calculated: basin area and length, basin relief, relief ratio, Melton index, slope, topographic wetness index, stream power index and curvature. The analysis shows that slopes in a range 30–45° have most important role, among the other topographic factors, for debris flow initiation. Melton index is a meaningful indicator for discrimination of debris flow types. It is greater than 1 at gully-induced debris flows and much lower at the debris flood section (0.14–0.16). The analysis of curvature rasters, generated as a second derivative of digital elevation model (DEM), shows that the considered gullies are subject of intensive erosion and the process is still active. The research is elaborated in GIS environment on the basis of DEM and field investigations. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) of the low part of the basins and debris flow fan is done, and detailed terrain models are developed for the purpose of morphometric analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aman SNA, Latif ZA, Pradhan B (2014) Spatial probabilistic approach on landslide susceptibility assessment from high resolution sensors derived parameters. IOP Conf Series Earth Environ Sci 18:012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/18/1/012057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASF DAAC (2015) PALSAR_Radiometric_Terrain_Corrected_high_res; AP_06736_PLR_F0840_RT1, AP_15853_FBS_F0820_RT1; Includes Material © JAXA/METI 2007. Accessed through ASF DAAC, 16 October, 2019. https://www.doi.org/10.5067/Z97HFCNKR6VA

  • Baltakova A, Nikolova V, Kenderova R, Hristova N (2018) Analysis of debris flows by application of GIS and remote sensing: case study of western foothills of Pirin Mountain (Bulgaria). In: DEBRIS FLOWS: disasters, risk, forecast, protection. Proceedings of the 5th international conference, Tbilisi, Georgia, 1–5 October 2018, pp 22–32

  • Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology/Un modèle à base physique de zone d’appel variable de l’hydrologie du bassin versant. Hydrol Sci J 24(1):43–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667909491834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovis MJ, Jakob M (1999) The role of debris supply conditions in predicting debris flow activity. Earth Surf Process Landf 24:1039–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli M, Crema S, Trevisani S, Marchi L (2017) GIS tools for preliminary debris-flow assessment at regional scale. J Mt Sci 14:2498–2510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4573-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Wang Q (2017) Debris flow-induced topographic changes: effects of recurrent debris flow initiation. Environ Monit Assess 189:449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6169-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C-Y, Yu F-C (2011) Morphometric analysis of debris flows and their source areas using GIS. Geomorphology 129:387–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanzo D, Rotigliano E, Irigaray C, Jiménez-Perálvarez JD, Chacón J (2012) Factors selection in landslide susceptibility modelling on large scale following the gis matrix method: application to the river Beiro basin (Spain). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:327–340. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-327-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haas T, Densmore AL (2019) Debris-flow volume quantile prediction from catchment morphometry. Geology 47(8):791–794. https://doi.org/10.1130/G45950.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrev N, Georgieva M (2010) The debris flow in the northern part of Kresna Gorge: characterisation of the source zone and material properties. Rev Bulg Geol Soc 71(1–3):113–121 (in Bulgarian with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotseva Z, Gerdjikov I, Vangelov D (2019) Modern debris flow activity in southern slopes of Rila Mountain, with an example from the area of Cherna Mesta village. Review of the Bulgarian Geological Society, vol 80, part 3, 2019, pp 227–229. National conference with international participation “GEOSCIENCES 2019”

  • Florinsky I (2016) Digital terrain analysis in soil science and geology. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl A, Poesen J, Scholiers N, Jacob M, Haile M, Deckers J, Nyssen J (2013) Factors controlling the morphology and volume (V)–length (L) relations of permanent gullies in the northern Ethiopian Highlands. Earth Surf Process Landf 38:1672–1684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson LE, Kostaschuck RA, MacDonald GM (1987) Identification of debris flow hazard on alluvial fan in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Geol Soc of Am Rev Eng 7:115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordanov B, Sarov S, Georgiev S, Dobrev G, Moskovska L, Grozdev V, Balkanska E (2008) Geological map of Bulgaria, 1:50000, Sheet K-35-75-G, Nikolovo (In Bulgarian)

  • Kang S, Lee S-R, Vasu NN, Park J-Y, Lee D-H (2017) Development of an initiation criterion for debris flows based on local topographic properties and applicability assessment at a regional scale. Eng Geol 230:64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.09.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karalis S, Karymbalis E, Valkanou K, Chalkias Ch, Katsafados P, Kalogeropoulos K, Batzakis V, Bofilios A (2014) Assessment of the relationships among catchments’ morphometric parameters and hydrologic indices. Int J Geosci 5:1571–1583. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2014.513128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenderova R, Vassilev I (1997) Characteristics of the debris flow from 20.09.1994 in Zheleznik gorge of Struma River. In: The Annual of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Faculty of Geology and Geography, vol 88, book 2 Geography, pp 29–50. (in Bulgarian)

  • Kenderova R, Baltakova A, Rachev G (2013a) Debris flows in the middle struma valley, Southwest-Bulgaria. In: Loczy D (ed) Geomorphological impacts of extreme weather. Springer, Berlin, pp 283–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenderova R, Rachev G, Baltakova A (2013b). Formation and manifestation of debris flows in the Middle Struma Valley (case from 3–5 December 2010). In: The Annual of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, faculty of geology and geography, vol 105, book 2, Geography, pp 15–31. (in Bulgarian)

  • Kenderova R, Rachev G, Baltakova A (2014) Debris flows in the Middle Struma Valley. In: The Annual of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, faculty of geology and geography, vol 106 book 2, Geography, pp 13-40. (in Bulgarian)

  • Krenchev D, Kenderova R (2019) Morphometric analysis of debris-flow catchments in Middle Struma Valley (Zheleznitsa Gorge, Bulgaria), Review of the Bulgarian Geological Society, vol 80, book 3, 2019, pp 233–235

  • Lay US, Pradhan B, Yusoff ZBM, Abdallah AFB, Aryal J, Park H-J (2019) Data mining and statistical approaches in debris-flow susceptibility modelling using airborne LiDAR data. Sensors 19:3451. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19163451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton MA (1958) Geometric properties of mature drainage basins and their representation in an E4 phase space. J Geol 66(1):35–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modeling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5:3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolova N, Rachev G, Kenderova R (2018) Possible impact of climate and weather condition on debris flows occurrence (on the example of Kresna gorge, Bulgaria). In: 5th international conference debris flows: disasters, risk, forecast, protection, Universal, Tbilisi, pp 166–175

  • Patton PC, Baker R (1976) Morphometry and floods in small drainage basins subject to diverse hydromorphic controls. Water Resour Res 12(5):941–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Bahareh K, Waleed MA, Bui TD (2017) Debris flow susceptibility assessment using airborne laser scanning data. In: Pradhan B (ed) Laser scanning applications in landslide assessment. Springer, Berlin, pp 85–113

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rowbotham D, De Scally F, Louis J (2005) The identification of debris torrent basins using morphometric measures derived within a GIS. Geografiska Annaler, Ser A Phys Geogr 87(4):527–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3676.2005.00276.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy J, Saha S (2019) Landslide susceptibility mapping using knowledge driven statistical models in Darjeeling District, West Bengal, India. Geoenviron Disasters 6:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-019-0126-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T (1981) Estimation of potential debris flows and their hazardous zones: soft countermeasures for a disaster. J Nat Disaster Sci 3(1):57–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren SD, Hohmann MG, Auerswald K, Mitasova H (2004) An evaluation of methods to determine slope using digital elevation data. CATENA 58:215–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilford DJ, Sakals ME, Innes JL, Sidle RC, Bergerud WA (2004) Recognition of debris flow, debris flood and flood hazard through watershed morphometrics. Landslides 1:61–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-003-0002-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W, Tang Ch, Van Asch ThWJ, Chang M (2015) A rapid method to identify the potential of debris flow development induced by rainfall in the catchments of the Wenchuan earthquake area. Landslides 13:1243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0631-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been carried out in the frame of National Science Program “Environmental Protection and Reduction of Risks of Adverse Events and Natural Disasters”, approved by the Resolution of the Council of Ministers No. 577/17.08.2018 and supported by the Ministry of Education and Science (MES) of Bulgaria (Agreement No. D01-322/18.12.2019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Mining and Geology “St. Ivan Rilski”, Sofia, Bulgaria

    Valentina Nikolova, Asparuh Kamburov & Radostina Rizova

Authors
  1. Valentina Nikolova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Asparuh Kamburov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Radostina Rizova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentina Nikolova.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikolova, V., Kamburov, A. & Rizova, R. Morphometric analysis of debris flows basins in the Eastern Rhodopes (Bulgaria) using geospatial technologies. Nat Hazards 105, 159–175 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04301-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04301-4

Keywords