Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Construction of collaborative mapping engine for dynamic disaster and emergency response

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the collaborative mapping of disasters, response situations and decisions, it is important to support various emergency responders with a unified platform to help in decision making and coordinating emergency action. However, most existing symbol libraries focus primarily on representing disasters and related information. These libraries lack specific symbols to map response situations and emergency decisions. For representation of dynamic disasters and response factors, these symbols support rich interactive editing after the symbols are mapped. In addition, decision making and mapping of disasters and response situations typically involve different domains of expertise and different responsibilities of map makers. It is essential to construct a collaborative mapping engine that supports disaster and emergency mapping on a collaborative platform. However, most existing methods of collaboration cannot readily support collaboration on symbols containing complex data structures or accommodate rich interactive editing operations. This article proposes a collaborative mapping engine for dynamic disasters and emergency responses. To support collaborative mapping based on complex data structures and rich interactive map symbols, it proposes a method of mapping operation replication to implement collaboration. Additionally, strategies were designed to enhance the efficiency and stability of collaboration. Finally, an experiment was conducted using the Wenchuan earthquake as an example. The results reveal that the engine can contribute to improved mapping efficiency and management during emergencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akella MK (2009) First responders and crisis map symbols: clarifying communication. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 36(1):19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arciniegas G, Janssen R, Rietveld P (2013) Effectiveness of collaborative map-based decision support tools: results of an experiment. Environ Model Softw 39(1):159–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandrova TL, Konečný M, Zlatanova S et al (2009) Cartography and geoinformatics for early warning and emergency management: towards better solutions, Prague. Kartografija I Geoinformacije 8(11):180

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergholt D, Lujala P (2012) Climate-related natural disasters, economic growth, and armed civil conflict. J Peace Res 49(1):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bian F, Sha Z (1995) An integrated GIS and knowledge-based decision support system in assisting farm-level agronomic decision-making. J Geogr Syst 1995(3):49–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchetti RA, Wallgrün JO, Yang J, Blanford J, Robinson AC, Klippel A (2012) Free classification of canadian and american emergency management map symbol standards. Cartogr J 49(4):350–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpendale MST (2003) Considering visual variables as a basis for information visualisation. Technical Report 2001-693-16. Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

  • Davies T, Mintz MD (2010) Relational access control with bivalent permissions in a social Web/collaboration architecture. In: IEEE international symposium on collaborative technologies and systems (CTS), 2010, (pp 57–66)

  • Feldbaum B (2002) Method and system for access control of a message queue. U.S. Patent No. 6,446,206. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC

  • Gunawan LT, Oomes AHJ, Neerincx M et al (2009) Collaborative situational mapping during emergency response. In: European conference on cognitive ergonomics: designing beyond the product—understanding activity and user experience in ubiquitous environments. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, p 6

  • Hardisty Frank (2009) Geojabber: enabling geo-collaborative visual analysis. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 36(3):267–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Lv Z, Wu J, Janowicz K, Zhao X, Yu B (2015) A multistage collaborative 3D GIS to support public participation. Int J Digit Earth 8(3):212–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Janowicz K, Couclelis H (2017) Prioritizing disaster mapping tasks for online volunteers based on information value theory. Geogr Anal 49(2):175–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang J, Wang P, Lung WS, Guo L, Li M (2012) A gis-based generic real-time risk assessment framework and decision tools for chemical spills in the river basin. J Hazard Mater 227–228(5):280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu N (2011) Collaborative governance in international disasters: Nargis cyclone in Myanmar and Sichuan earthquake in China cases. Int J Emerg Manag 8(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerle N, Hoffman RR (2013) Collaborative damage mapping for emergency response: the role of cognitive systems engineering. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13(1):97–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konecny M, Bandrova T (2006) Proposal for a standard in cartographic visualization of natural risks and disasters. Int J Urban Sci 10(2):130–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulawiak M, Lubniewski Z (2014) Safecity—a GIS-based tool profiled for supporting decision making in urban development and infrastructure protection. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 89:174–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan MP, Lee J (2005) Emergency response after 9/11: the potential of real-time 3D GIS for quick emergency response in micro-spatial environments. Comput Environ Urban Syst 29(2):93–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loayza NV, Olaberría E, Rigolini J, Christiaensen L (2009) Natural disasters and growth: going beyond the averages. World Dev 40(7):1317–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Xu J (2014) The progress of emergency response and rescue in china: a comparative analysis of Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes. Nat Hazards 74(2):421–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neis P, Singler P, Zipf A (2010) Collaborative mapping and emergency routing for disaster logistics—case studies from the Haiti earthquake and the UN portal for Afrika. In: Proceedings of the geoinformatics forum, Salzburg, Austria, 6–9 July 2010

  • Redmond AD (2011) The UK medical response to the Sichuan earthquake. Emerg Med J 28(6):516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson AC, Pezanowski S, Troedson S, Bianchetti R, Blanford J, Stevens J et al (2013) Symbol store: sharing map symbols for emergency management. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 40(5):415–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Aalst MKV (2006) The impacts of climate change on the risk of natural disasters. Disasters 30(1):5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu A, Convertino G, Ganoe C, Carroll JM, Zhang X (2013) Supporting collaborative sense-making in emergency management through geo-visualization. Int J Hum Comput Stud 71(1):4–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu B, Lin H, Chiu L et al (2011) Collaborative virtual geographic environments: a case study of air pollution simulation. Inf Sci 181(11):2231–2246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang LB, Zhou M, Feng YP, Liu YL, Chen YH (2007) The establishment of the map symbol database based on ArcGIS. Sci-Tech Inf Dev Econ 22:120

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou L, Xie Z, Huang B (2009) Sharing of map symbol based on SVG. In: IEEE international conference on information engineering and computer science, pp 1–4

  • Zhu J, Gong J, Qi H, Song T (2006) Study on data collaboration service for collaborative virtual geographic environment. Advances in artificial reality and tele-existence. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described in this article involves many geo-analysis models and was supported by the following research programs: The National Basic Research Programme of China (973 Program) [Grant No. 2015CB954102] and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Nos. 41231173 and 41471317].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoqiang Peng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, G., Wen, Y., Li, Y. et al. Construction of collaborative mapping engine for dynamic disaster and emergency response. Nat Hazards 90, 217–236 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3045-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3045-6

Keywords

Navigation