Abstract
Earthquake emergency response and rescue (ERR) is a global challenge, but especially in developing countries. As a large earthquake-prone developing country, China’s experiences and lessons in ERR can provide a useful reference for other developing countries. In this article, China’s ERR progress is summarized by comparatively analyzing the Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes, two major recent earthquake events in Sichuan Province. From a comprehensive investigation of the research, it can be concluded that emergency response speed, inter-organizational coordination, and relief resource mobilization are the three critical ERR indicators which can be further subdivided into sixteen sub-indicators. Using these indicators, the Wenchuan and Lushan earthquake ERR processes were comprehensively compared based on data collected from observations and interviews. The results showed that the response and rescue efforts at the Lushan earthquake were faster, more coordinated, and more orderly than those at the Wenchuan earthquake. In addition, the unified earthquake ERR system, the people-oriented principle, and the information disclosure mechanism were examined, which also revealed several major shortcomings, such as deficits in the adaptability to relief technologies, the lack of coordination between rescue organizations, and the lack of capabilities in the local communities. Finally, several recommendations are given for the practical improvement of and future research into the establishment of an effective ERR.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander D (2002) Principles of emergency planning and management. Terra Publishing, Hertfordshire
Allenby B, Fink J (2005) Toward inherently secure and resilient societies. Science 309:1034–1036
Board on Natural Disasters (1999) Mitigation emerges as major strategy for reducing losses caused by natural disasters. Science 284:1943–1947
Boin A, Kelle P, Whybark DC (2010) Resilient supply chains for extreme situations: outlining a new field of study. Int J Prod Econ 126(1):1–6
Chan EYY (2013) Bottom-up disaster resilience. Nat Geosci 6:327–328
Chen Y, Booth DC (2011) The Wenchuan Earthquake of 2008: anatomy of a disaster. Springer, Berlin
Chen R, Sharman R, Rao HR, Upadhyaya S (2008) Coordination in emergency response management. Commun ACM 51(5):66–73
Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Change 18(4):598–606
Doyle JC (1996) Improving performance in emergency management. Disaster Prev Manag 5(3):32–46
Edrissi A, Poorzahedy H, Nassiri H, Nourinejad M (2013) A multi-agent optimization formulation of earthquake disaster prevention and management. Eur J Oper Res 229(1):261–275
Eshghi K, Larson RC (2008) Disasters: lessons from the past 105 years. Disaster Prev Manag 17(1):62–82
Fiedrich F, Gehbauer F, Rickers U (2000) Optimized resource allocation for emergency response after earthquake disasters. Saf Sci 35(1):41–57
Flint CG, Stevenson J (2009) Building community disaster preparedness with volunteers: community emergency response teams in Illinois. Nat Hazards Rev 11(3):118–124
Ge Y, Gu YT, Deng WG (2010) Evaluating China’s national post-disaster plans: the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake’s recovery and reconstruction planning. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 1(2):17–27
George PC (2008) Historical earthquakes in China. www.drgeorgepc.com/EarthquakesChina.html. Accessed 18 July 2013
Global Times (2013) Disaster relief needs efforts from all people. www.globaltimes.cn/content/776488.shtml. Accessed 28 July 2013
Gopalakrishnan C, Okada N (2007) Designing new institutions for implementing integrated disaster risk management: key elements and future directions. Disasters 31(4):353–372
Granot H (1997) Emergency inter-organizational relationships. Disaster Prev Manag 6(5):305–310
Hossain L, Kuti M (2010) Disaster response preparedness coordination through social networks. Disasters 34(3):755–786
Hosseini M, Izadkhah YO (2010) Training emergency managers for earthquake response: challenges and opportunities. Disaster Prev Manag 19(2):185–198
Hosseini KA, Hosseinioon S, Pooyan Z (2013) An investigation into the socioeconomic aspects of two major earthquakes in Iran. Disasters 37(3):516–535
IFRC (International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies) (2010) World Disasters Report 2010: focus on urban risk. IFRC, Geneva
Kapucu N (2006) Interagency communication networks during emergencies: boundary spanners in multiagency coordination. Am Rev Public Adm 36(2):207–225
Kapucu N (2008) Collaborative emergency management: better community organising, better public preparedness and response. Disasters 32(2):239–262
Kapucu N, Arslan T, Collins ML (2010) Examining intergovernmental and interorganizational response to catastrophic disasters toward a network-centered approach. Adm Soc 42(2):222–247
Kilby P (2008) The strength of networks: the local NGO response to the tsunami in India. Disasters 32(1):120–130
Kusumasari B, Alam Q (2012) Local wisdom-based disaster recovery model in Indonesia. Disaster Prev Manag 21(3):351–369
Kuwata Y, Takada S (2004) Effective emergency transportation for saving human lives. Nat Hazards 33(1):23–46
Liu JF, Fan YD, Shi PJ (2011) Response to a high-altitude earthquake: the Yushu Earthquake example. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 2(1):43–53
Manoj BS, Baker AH (2007) Communication challenges in emergency response. Commun ACM 50(3):51–53
Marincioni F (2007) Information technologies and the sharing of disaster knowledge: the critical role of professional culture. Disasters 31(4):459–476
McEntire DA (2008) Issues in disaster relief: progress, perpetual problems and prospective solutions. Disaster Prev Manag 8(5):351–361
Miao X, Banister D, Tang Y (2013) Embedding resilience in emergency resource management to cope with natural hazards. Nat Hazards 69(3):1389–1404
Momani NM (2012) Integrated framework for earthquake consequences management. Disaster Prev Manag 21(2):184–205
Moynihan D (2013) A central agency is crucial for disaster response. Nature 495:7
Ouyang Y (2013) Earthquake tests China’s emergency system. Lancet 381:1801–1802
Özdamar L, Ekinci E, Küçükyazici B (2004) Emergency logistics planning in natural disasters. Ann Oper Res 129(1):217–245
Palm R (1987) Pre-disaster planning: the response of residential real estate developers to special studies zones. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 5(1):95–102
Quarantelli EL (1993) Organizational response to the Mexico City earthquake of 1985: characteristics and implications. Nat Hazards 8(1):19–38
Roney B (2011) Earthquakes and civil society: a comparative study of the response of China’s nongovernment organizations to the Wenchuan earthquake. China Inf 25(1):83–104
Salmon P, Stanton N, Jenkins D, Walker G (2011) Coordination during multi-agency emergency response: issues and solutions. Disaster Prev Manag 20(2):140–158
Saoud NB, Mena TB, Dugdale J, Pavard B, Ahmed MB (2006) Assessing large scale emergency rescue plans: an agent based approach. Int J Intell Control Syst 11(4):260–271
Schiermeier Q (2005) Natural disasters: the chaos to come. Nature 438:903–906
Schooley BL, Horan TA (2007) Towards end-to-end government performance management: case study of interorganizational information integration in emergency medical services (EMS). Gov Inf Q 24(4):755–784
Shan SQ, Wang L, Li L, Chen Y (2012) An emergency response decision support system framework for application in e-government. Inf Technol Manag 13(4):411–427
Shaw R, Goda K (2004) From disaster to sustainable civil society: the Kobe experience. Disasters 28(1):16–40
Sheu JB (2007) An emergency logistics distribution approach for quick response to urgent relief demand in disasters. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 43(6):687–709
Simo G, Bies AL (2007) The role of nonprofits in disaster response: an expanded model of cross-sector collaboration. Public Adm Rev 67(s1):125–142
Subramaniam C, Ali H, Shamsudin FM (2010) Understanding the antecedents of emergency response: a proposed framework. Disaster Prev Manag 19(5):571–581
Suzuki I, Kaneko Y (2013) Japan’s Disaster Governance: how was the 311 crisis managed?. Springer, Berlin
Tucker BE (2013) Reducing earthquake risk. Science 341:1070–1072
Van Wassenhove LN (2005) Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear. J Oper Res Soc 57(5):475–489
Wang ZF (2008) A preliminary report on the Great Wenchuan Earthquake. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 7(2):225–234
Waugh WL, Streib G (2006) Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Adm Rev 66(s1):131–140
Xu JP, Lu Y (2012) Meta-synthesis pattern of post-disaster recovery and reconstruction: based on actual investigation on 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Nat Hazards 60(2):199–222
Xu JP, Lu Y (2013) A comparative study on the national counterpart aid model for post-disaster recovery and reconstruction: 2008 Wenchuan earthquake as a case. Disaster Prev Manag 22(1):75–93
Xu XW, Wen XZ, Han ZJ et al (2013) Lushan M S7. 0 earthquake: a blind reserve-fault event. Chin Sci Bull 58(28–29):3437–3443
Yang Y (2010) The 9/21 earthquake in Taiwan: a local government disaster rescue system. Disasters 34(1):112–136
Yang J, Chen J, Liu H, Zhang K, Ren W, Zheng J (2013) The Chinese national emergency medical rescue team response to the Sichuan Lushan earthquake. Nat Hazards 69(3):2263–2268
Zhang L, Liu X, Li Y et al (2012) Emergency medical rescue efforts after a major earthquake: lessons from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Lancet 379:853–861
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Major Bidding Program of the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12 & ZD217), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2014M550470), the Major Program of the Social Science Foundation of Sichuan (Grant No. SC13ZD06), and the Research Funding of Sichuan University (Grant No. SKG2013001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, Y., Xu, J. The progress of emergency response and rescue in China: a comparative analysis of Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes. Nat Hazards 74, 421–444 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1191-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1191-7