Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian Cell Force Estimation Considering Force Directions

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traction force microscopy is a useful technique for measuring mechanical forces generated by cells. In this method, fluorescent nano beads are embedded in the elastic substrate of cell culture, on which cells are cultured. Then, cellular forces are estimated from bead displacements, which represent the force-induced deformation of the substrate under the cell. Estimating the forces from the bead displacements is not easy when the bead density is low or the locations of cellular attachments are unknown. In this study, we propose a Bayesian algorithm by introducing a prior force direction that is based on cellular morphology. We apply the Bayesian framework to synthetic datasets in conditions under which the bead density is low and cellular attachment points are unknown. We demonstrate that the Bayesian algorithm improves accuracy in force estimation compared with the previous algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kleeberger W, Bova GS, Nielsen ME, Herawi M, Chuang AY, Epstein JI, Berman DM (2007) Roles for the stem cell-associated intermediate filament nestin in prostate cancer migration and metastasis. Cancer Res 67(19):9199–9206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Hayre M, Salanga CL, Handel TM, Allen SJ (2008) Chemokines and cancer: migration, intracellular signalling and intercellular communication in the microenvironment. Biochem J 409:635–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Calandra T, Bucala R (1997) Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF): a glucocorticoid counter-regulator within the immune system. Crit Rev Immunol 17:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Luster AD, Alon R, von Andrian UH (2005) Immune cell migration in inflammation: present and future therapeutic targets. Nat Immunol 6:1182–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Edmondson JC, Hatten ME (1987) Glial-guided granule neuron migration in vitro: a high-resolution time-lapse video microscopic study. J Neurosci 7(6):1928–1934

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tessier-Lavigne M, Goodman CS (1996) The molecular biology of axon guidance. Science 274:1123–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ma Q, Jones D, Borghesani PR, Segal RA, Nagasawa T, Kishimoto T, Bronson RT, Springer TA (1998) Impaired B-lymphopoiesis, myelopoiesis, and derailed cerebellar neuron migration in CXCR4- and SDF-1-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(16):9448–9453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dickson BJ (2002) Molecular mechanisms of axon guidance. Science 298:1959–1964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Charron F, Tessier-Lavigne M (2005) Novel brain wiring functions for classical morphogens: a role as graded positional cues in axon guidance. Development 132:2251–2262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Beningo KA, Wang Y-L (2002) Flexible substrata for the detection of cellular traction forces. Trends Cell Biol 12:79–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Roy P, Rajfur Z, Pomorski P, Jacobson K (2002) Microscope based-techniques to study cell adhesion and migration. Nat Cell Biol 4:E91–E96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rieu JP, Barentin C, Maeda Y, Sawada Y (2005) Direct mechanical force measurements during the migration of dictyostelium slugs using flexible substrata. Biophys J 89:3563–3576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gardel ML, Sabass B, Ji L, Danuser G, Schwarz US, Waterman CM (2008) Traction stress in focal adhesions correlates biphasically with actin retrograde flow speed. J Cell Biol 183(6):999–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stricker J, Sabass B, Schwarz US, Gardel ML (2010) Optimization of traction force microscopy for micron-sized focal adhesions. J Phys 22:194104

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bridgman PC, Dave S, Asnes CF, Tullio AN, Adelstein RS (2001) Myosin IIB is required for growth cone motility. J Neurosci 21(16):6159–6169

    Google Scholar 

  16. Suter DM, Forscher P (2001) Transmission of growth cone traction force through apCAM-cytoskeletal linkages is regulated by Src family tyrosine kinase activity. J Cell Biol 155(3):427–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chan CE, Odde DJ (2008) Traction dynamics of filopodia on compliant substrates. Science 322(5908):1687–1691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Toriyama M, Kozawa S, Sakumura Y, Inagaki N (2013) Conversion of a signal into forces for axon outgrowth through Pak1-mediated shootin1 phosphorylation. Curr Biol 23(6):529–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang JHC, Lin JS (2007) Cell traction force and measurement methods. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 6:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1970) Theory of elasticity. Course of theoretical physics, 2nd edn. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dembo M, Oliver T, Ishihara A, Jacobson K (1996) Imaging the traction stresses exerted by locomoting cells with the elastic substratum method. Biophys J 70:2008–2022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dembo M, Wang YL (1999) Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. Biophys J 76:2307–2316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Butler JP, Tolic-Norrelykkex IM, Fabry B, Fredberg JJ (2002) Traction fields, moments, and strain energy that cells exert on their surroundings. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282:C595–C605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang Z, Lin JS, Chen J, Wang JH (2006) Determining substrate displacement and cell traction fields-a new approach. J Theor Biol 242:607–616

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwarz US, Balaban NQ, Riveline D, Bershadsky A, Geiger B, Safran SA (2002) Calculation of forces at focal adhesions from elastic substrate data: the effect of localized force and the need for regularization. Biophys J 83:1380–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sabass B, Gardel ML, Waterman CM, Schwarz US (2008) High resolution traction force microscopy based on experimental and computational advances. Biophys J 94:207–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Forscher P, Smith SJ (1988) Actions of cytochalasins on the organization of actin filaments and microtubules in a neuronal growth cone. J Cell Biol 107:1505–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin CH, Espreafico EM, Mooseker MS, Forscher P (1996) Myosin drives retrograde F-actin flow in neuronal growth cones. Neuron 16:769–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pollard TD, Borisy GG (2003) Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell 112:453–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pantaloni D, Clainche CL, Carlier MF (2001) Mechanism of actin-based motility. Science 292:1502–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (25330341) and Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (25102010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazushi Ikeda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kozawa, S., Sakumura, Y., Toriyama, M. et al. Bayesian Cell Force Estimation Considering Force Directions. Neural Process Lett 41, 191–200 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-013-9320-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-013-9320-y

Keywords

Navigation