We have previously observed that in common snails trained to an associative skill consisting of refusing a defined foodstuff, impairment of memory reconsolidation by the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 evokes amnesia in which the skill can be recovered by retraining at the early stage (<10 days) while retraining at the late stage does not lead to formation of the skill. In the experiments reported here, amnesia was induced with MK-801 and a reminder 24 h after training of snails to conditioned taste aversion, and the antiamnestic effects of D-cycloserine, a partial agonist of the glycine site of the NMDA receptor, were studied in the early (day 3) and late (day 12) stages. Three days after induction of amnesia, injections of D-cycloserine and a reminder of the conditioned food stimulus led to recovery of the memory; administration of D-cycloserine without a subsequent reminder was ineffective. Injection of D-cycloserine and a reminder 12 days after induction of amnesia had no effect on its development and retraining did not lead to recovery of the memory. Thus, this study is the first to show that the NMDA receptor agonist D-cycloserine influences memory recovery processes only at the early stage of development of amnesia induced by lesioning of reconsolidation processes, while the late stage of amnesia was not sensitive to this agonist.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
N. I. Dubrovina, D. R. Zinoviev, and D. V. Zinovieva, “N-methyl-Daspartate receptors and amnesia in mice with a depression-like state,” Byull. Eksperim. Biol. Med., 144, No. 11, 484–486 (2007).
S. A. Kozyrev and V. P. Nikitin, “Neuronal mechanisms of the reactivation of an associative aversive skill to food in the common snail,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 95, No. 6, 652–662 (2009).
S. V. Solntseva and V. P. Nikitin, “Serotonin and NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists selectively impair the reactivation of associative memory in the common snail,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 93, No. 10, 1101–1111 (2007).
S. V. Solntseva and V. P. Nikitin, “The reversible and irreversible stages of the development of amnesia after impairment of the reactivation of an associative memory in snails,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 59, No. 2, 232–241 (2009).
S. V. Solntseva and V. P. Nikitin, “Effects of NMDA glutamate and serotonin receptor agonists at different stages of amnesia induced by impairment to the reconsolidation of long-term memory,” Neirokhimiya, 27, No. 3 (2010).
A. Adeleye, F. Shohami, D. Nachman, A. Alexandrovich, V. Trembovler, R. Yaka, Y. Shoshan, J. Dhawan, and A. Biegon, “D-cycloserine improves functional outcome after traumatic brain injury with wide therapeutic window,” Eur. J. Pharmacol., 629, No. 1–3, 25–30 (2010).
K. V. Anokhin, A. A. Tiunova, and S. P. R. Rose, “Reminder effects – reconsolidation or retrieval deficit? Pharmacological dissection with protein synthesis inhibitors following reminder for a passiveavoidance task in young chicks,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 15, No. 11, 1759–1765 (2002).
P. M. Balaban, “Declarative and procedural memory in animals with simple nervous systems,” in: Psychology at the Turn of the Millennium, S. Hofsten (ed.), Akad. Press, Stockholm (2002), No. 1, pp. 1–28.
A. Biegon, M. Alvarado, T. F. Budinger, R. Grossman, K. Hensley, M. S. West, Y. Kotake, M. Ono, and R. A. Floyd, “Region-selective effects of neuroinflammation and antioxidant treatment on peripheral benzodiazepine receptors and NMDA receptors in the rat brain,” J. Neurochem., 82, No. 4, 924–934 (2002).
A. Biegon, P. A. Fry, C. M. Paden, A. Alexandrovich, J. Tsenter, and E. Shohami, “Dynamic changes in N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors after closed head injury in mice: Implications for treatment of neurological and cognitive deficits,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, No. 14, 5117–5122 (2004).
R. A. Davenport and T. A. Houpt, “D-cycloserine enhances shortdelay, but not long-delay, conditioned taste aversion learning in rats,” Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 91, No. 4, 596–603 (2009).
J. Dhawan, H. Benveniste, M. Hawrocky, S. D. Smith, and A. Biegon, “Transient focal ischemia results in persistent and widespread neuroinflammation and loss of glutamate NMDA receptors,” Neuroimage, 51, No. 2, 599–605 (2010).
L. K. Friedman, M. D. Ginsberg, L. Belayev, R. Busto, O. F. Alonso, B. Lin, and M. Y. Globus, “Intraischemic but not postischemic hypothermia prevents non-selective hippocampal downregulation of AMPA and NMDA receptor gene expression after global ischemia,” Mol. Brain Res., 86, No. 1–2, 34–47 (2001).
T. H. Gainutdinova, R. R. Tagirova, A. I. Ismailova, L. N. Muranova, E. I. Samarova, K. L. Gainutdinov, and P. M. Balaban, “Reconsolidation of a context long-term memory in the terrestrial snail requires protein synthesis,” Learn. Mem., 12, No. 6, 620–625 (2005).
G. J. Golden and T. A. Haupt, “NMDA receptor in conditioned flavor-taste preference learning: blockade by MK-801 and enhancement by D-cycloserine,” Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 86, No. 3, 587–596 (2007).
T. J. Ha, A. B. Kohnl, Y. V. Bobkoval, and L. L. Moroz, “Molecular characterization of NMDA-like receptors in Aplysia and Lymnaea: Relevance to memory and mechanisms,” Biol. Bull., 210, No. 3, 255–270 (2006).
J. L. Lee and B. J. Everitt, “Appetitive memory reconsolidation depends on NMDA receptor-mediated neurotransmission,” Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., 90, No. 1, 147–154 (2008).
J. L. C. Lee, A. L. Milton, and B. J. Everitt, “Reconsolidation and extinction of conditioned fear: inhibition and potentiation,” J. Neurosci., 26, No. 39, 10051–10056 (2006).
Y.-S. Lee and A. J. Silva, “The molecular and cellular biology of enhancer recognition,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 10, No. 2, 126–140 (2009).
T. Maurice, B. P. Lockhart, T. P. Su, and A. Privat, “Reversion of beta 25-35-amyloid peptide-induced amnesia by NMDA receptor-associated glycine site agonists,” Brain Res., 731, No. 1–2, 249–253 (1996).
K. A. Nader, “A single standard for memory; the case for reconsolidation,” Debates Neuroscience, 1, No. 1, 2–16 (2007).
R. Richardson, L. Ledgerwood, and J. Cranney, “Facilitation of fear extinction by D-cycloserine: Theoretic and clinical implications,” Learn. Mem., 11, No. 5, 510–516 (2004).
S. J. Sara and B. Hars, “In memory of consolidation,” Learn. Mem., 13, No. 5, 515–521 (2006).
S. Sihver, N. Marklund, L. Hillered, B. Långström, T. Watanabe, and M. Bergström, “Changes in mACh, NMDA and GABA(A) receptor binding after lateral fluid-percussion injury: in vitro autoradiography of rat brain frozen sections,” J. Neurochem., 78, No. 3, 417–423 (2001).
F. A. Stephenson, S. L. Cousins, and A. V. Kenny, “Assembly and forward trafficking of NMDA receptors,” Mol. Membr. Biol., 25, No. 4, 311–320 (2008).
N. C. Tronson and J. R. Taylor, “Molecular mechanisms of memory reconsolidation,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 8, No. 4, 262–275 (2007).
D. L. Walker, K. J. Ressler, K. T. Lu, and M. Davis, “Facilitation of conditioned fear extinction by systemic administration of intraamygdalar infusions of D-cycloserine as assessed with fear-potentiated startle in rats,” J. Neurosci., 22, No. 6, 2343–2351 (2002).
H. Wolosker, “NMDA receptor regulation by D-serine: new findings and perspectives,” Mol. Neurobiol., 36, No. 2, 152–164 (2007).
R. Yaka, A. Biegon, N. Grigoriadis, C. Simeonidou, S. Grigoriadis, A. G. Alexandrovich, H. Matzner, J. Scheumann, V. Trembovler, J. Tsenter, and E. Shohami, “D-cycloserine improves functional recovery and reinstates long-term potentiation (LTP) in a mouse model of closed head injury,” FASEB J., 21, No. 9, 2033–2041 (2007).
W. Zajaczkowski and W. Danysz, “Effects of D-cycloserine and aniracetam on spatial learning in rats with entorhinal cortex lesions,” Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 56, No. 1, 21–29 (1997).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 96, No. 12, pp. 1212–1222, December, 2010.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Solntseva, S.V., Nikitin, V.P. Recovery of Memory by the Glutamate NMDA Receptor Agonist D-Cycloserine Depends on the Stage of Development of Amnesia. Neurosci Behav Physi 42, 408–415 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-012-9580-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-012-9580-4