Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a form of brain disorder that causes functions’ loss in a person’s daily activity. Due to the tremendous progress of Alzheimer’s patients and the lack of accurate diagnostic tools, early detection and classification of Alzheimer’s disease are open research areas. Accurate detection of Alzheimer’s disease in an effective way is one of the many researchers’ goals to limit or overcome the disease progression. The main objective of the current survey is to introduce a comprehensive evaluation and analysis of the most recent studies for AD early detection and classification under the state-of-the-art deep learning approach. The article provides a simplified explanation of the system stages such as imaging, preprocessing, learning, and classification. It addresses broad categories of structural, functional, and molecular imaging in AD. The included modalities are magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; both structural and functional) and positron emission tomography (PET; for assessment of both cerebral metabolism and amyloid). It reviews the process of pre-processing techniques to enhance the quality. Additionally, the most common deep learning techniques used in the classification process will be discussed. Although deep learning with preprocessing images has achieved high performance as compared to other techniques, there are some challenges. Moreover, it will also review some challenges in the classification and preprocessing image process over some articles what they introduce, and techniques used, and how they solved these problems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurological disease that affects the disorder in brain function and destroys brain cells slowly that leads to a loss in memory and instability in human life [122]. AD pathogenesis is thought to be caused by the overproduction of amyloid-β (Aβ) and hyperphosphorylation of tau protein. This results in the accumulation of Aβ plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles, which disrupt the nucleocytoplasmic transport between neurons leading to cell death, which causes loss in memory and learning [112]. Physicians diagnose patients concerning many requirements where imaging scanning is an essential part. The common symptoms are (1) loss of motion function, (2) speaking difficulties, and (3) memory problems [12].
In our time with economic development and the advent of computer technology and medical information processing technologies, doctors require fast and accurate ways to diagnose and detect the disease aiming to help patients and save their lives. Compared with the traditional ways for diagnosing the disease. Patients pass through several stages to be diagnosed with the disease, but this can be late due to the diagnosis stages, and patients become in a late stage [109]. So, early diagnosis of AD is very important for patients, that help him in taking precaution and help clinicians to detect the risk of the progress of AD, it provides AD patients with knowledge of the seriousness and encourages them to take preventive steps, such as lifestyle changes and drugs [87].
Researchers want to find a simple and accurate approach to identify Alzheimer’s disease before symptoms appear. So, Early detection of AD has discovered the symptoms before reaching to risk stage. AD has several stages, one of these stages that appear disease in the prodromal stage is MCI. MCI is a stage of memory loss or other cognitive abilities loss (such as language or visual/spatial perception) in people who can still do most of their daily tasks independently [39].
Recently, most researchers’ interest in a search in this field to care about it to improve the quality of a patient’s life and discover drugs by tracking the pathological processes related to several stages of AD [112]. Due to AD is develop progressive disease so it has several stages, cognitive normal (CN), Mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Late Mild cognitive impairment (LMCI), and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). There are various technologies for neuroimaging that help researchers in classification, the common one that uses to imaging brain tissue in magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) [6]. Deep learning is the most common and best technique used for the diagnosis and classification of disease with a large number of input data [6].
Many surveys have been published recently reviewing histopathological imag#e analysis comprising its history, and detailed information of general artificial intelligence techniques [29, 52, 54, 55, 136, 139]; the main limitation is the lack of surveys of histopathological image analysis that focused on Alzheimer’s disease [29, 52, 54, 63, 152]. Accordingly, we present more image analysis from an Alzheimer’s disease point of view in this survey.
The main objective of the current survey is to provide a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art image analysis and artificial intelligence techniques, specifically for histopathology images in AD, and their challenges. This survey focuses on 159 state-of-the-art related studies, where 110 papers concentrate mainly on Alzheimer’s disease. Figure 1 depicts the corresponding statistical distribution of the studies used in the current survey.
1.1 Paper contributions
In summary, the current survey is to introduce a comprehensive evaluation and analysis of the most recent studies for AD early detection and classification under the state-of-the-art deep learning approach. Also, we present some preprocessing techniques that can enhance the quality of images and achieve the best performance of the classification process. Moreover, it will highlight different challenges throughout related studies and how they overcome them. In evaluating and analyzing the existing studies, several common trends and gaps have been identified.
The contributions of the current survey are summarized as follows:
-
Introducing a process and stage of diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease from acquiring the data to how to classify disease.
-
Presenting type and modalities of brain imaging such as MRI, PET, and CT and comparative advantage and disadvantage.
-
Summarizing the most important basics and background related to the presented survey with a focus on deep learning as one of the most important recent trends to improve these systems.
-
Categorizing the most important Research Challenges for each the most recent and significant.
-
Presenting a comparison between various articles and present the contribution of each article, the most significant feature, and the advantage (and the disadvantage) of the solution that they used in solving a specific problem.
-
Concluding the most open research points in this area.
1.2 Paper organization
The current survey is organized as follows: Section 2 presents different related works in the diagnosis of AD, Section 3 introduces an overview of ML and deep learning (DL), definitions, and challenges. Section 4 focuses on the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease as an overview and highlights the various used methods. Section 5 explores the most important problems and challenges associated with the early detection of AD and concludes remarks. We introduce some future possibilities in Section 6. We present our limitation in Section 7. Finally, the survey is concluded in Section 8.
2 Related work
Due to the importance of early diagnosis of AD, many researchers interest search in this field to solve the problem of AD. So, this section will present the most important research in this field. Table 1 introduces a comparison between different studies that diagnosis AD with different DL techniques. Jain et al. [66] proposed a transfer learning approach for classifying MRI images. They used PE SE CTL mathematical model to differentiate between 3 classes (AD, MCI, CN). Firstly, they collected data from ADNI datasets and make preprocessing data by using FreeSurfer (PE) to eliminate unnecessary information of MRI images. Preprocessing techniques that they used are 5 process motion correction, non-uniform intensity normalization, Talairach transform computation, intensity normalization, skull stripping. Then after preprocessing data, select the most important slices (SE) that have more information based on entropy. Lastly, they used the VGG16 pre-trained model and transfer learning to build a classification model (CTL). Their proposed technique achieves high accuracy of 95.3%, 99.14%, 99.3%, 99.22% for 3-way classification (AD vs MCI vs CN), AD vs CN, AD vs MCI, and CN vs MCI, respectively.
Ding et al. [35] introduced a CNN architecture by using an Inception v3 network trained on 90% of ADNI data and testing 10%. Fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET images are processed by using the grid method, these images are acquired from the ADNI dataset. Otsu threshold was applied to detect brain voxel. Adam optimizer was used with a learning rate of 0.0001 and with batch size 8 for the training model. The model was trained by using 90% of the dataset (1921 images studies), this dataset includes 3 classes (AD, MCI, and no disease). The proposed architecture achieves 82% of specificity and 100% sensitivity.
In Chitradevi et al. [28], several optimization algorithms (Genetic Algorithm, particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm, Grey Wolf Optimization, and Cuckoo Search) were used to segment the brain into sub-region such as the hippocampus, white matter, and gray matter. They acquired images from Chettinad Health City which contain 200 images for AD and normal patients, images were processed with various methods such as skull stripping, enhance quality, and contrast enhancement. After segmentation, to get the performance of segmentation they validate the segmented region with a ground truth image. The validation measures Feature Similarity Index Metrics, Structure Similarity Index Metrics, dice similarity, Jaccard Index, Tanimoto, and volume similarity. To perform feature extraction and classification model CNN was used especially AlexNet. Grey Wolf Optimization shows the highest performance compared with other optimization techniques by achieving high accuracy with 95%.
Nawaz et al. [94] proposed three models and compared them to get which of them achieve high accuracy. In the first model, images are preprocessed and extracted the handcrafted features and make classification by using support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, and Random Forest. Second model, training model on the preprocessed dataset from scratch by using CNN deep learning model. The third model, AlexNet is used to extract deep features, to determine the best classifier support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, and Random Forest was fed with features. By comparing the three models, the deep features-based model achieved the best accuracy with a support vector machine classifier. By comparing result analysis support vector machine achieve the highest accuracy of 99.21% and the accuracy of k-nearest neighbor 57.32% and random forest achieve 93.97%.
Kundaram et al. [79] acquired data from the ADNI dataset and preprocessed images by rescaling it to 255. CNN models are used to trained and classify disease. Images were classified into 3 classes (AD, MCI, and NC), 9540 images are used for the training model. CNN model is consists of three convolutional layers, three max-pooling, four ReLU activation layers. They used different optimizers such as Adam, SGD, Adagrad, Nadam, Adadelta, Rmsprop. By comparing different optimizers with the proposed framework, Adagrad achieves the best accuracy with less loss. The proposed model achieved 98.57% accuracy on the ADNI dataset.
In Table 2 we compare the recent survey of AD with DL and our proposed survey. Description and limitation for each survey are presented to show the difference and similarities between other survey and our proposed survey.
3 Machine Learning and Deep Learning overview
Machine learning is a branch of artificial intelligence that has become precisely widespread, and valuable, in the last two decades. One definition of ML is that it is the semi-automated extraction of knowledge from data [15]. ML uses data to feed an algorithm that can understand the relationship between the input and the output. When the machine finishes learning, it can predict the value or the class of a new data point [64].
Deep learning is a subset of ML, as shown in Fig. 2. ML is an algorithm with the ability to learn without being explicitly programmed. Artificial intelligence is a technique of getting the machine to work and behave like humans. In DL, the learning phase is done through the artificial neural network [14]. An artificial neural network is an architecture where the layers are stacked on top of each other. There are different DL types such as convolutional neural networks (CNN), recurrent neural networks (RNN), and autoencoders [58].
Although the performance of ML models has progressively better in many functions, they still need guidance (e.g., human experts) to solve some problems. Developers should enhance the architecture or algorithm if incorrect predictions are returned. On the other hand, a DL model algorithm, whether the prediction is correct or not, is adaptive and learns from the features automatically on its own [89].
The major differences between ML and DL are summarized in Table 1. DL is a specific category (i.e., branch) of ML. ML extracts a relevant feature manually from input data. Then the extracted feature is used to update the model parameters that will help in the correct prediction (i.e., classification) process [146]. This does not apply with DL as relevant features are extracted automatically from data. In addition to that, DL implements end-to-end learning where data and the task required to be implemented are passed to the network [26]. As mentioned, the learning process is done automatically from the features and hence no more manual modifications (i.e., enhancements) are required.
From Table 3. It compares ML and DL according to some factor data size, time of training data, and interpretability. ML provides several approaches and models that you can choose depending on your application, the size of the data you are processing, and the type of problem you want to solve [69]. To train the model, a high-performance DL application requires a very large amount of data (i.e., thousands of records) [51]. Over the last few years, DL has provided extensive applications in image recognition [101, 148], speech recognition [33, 97], medicine and pharmacy [84, 144], natural language processing [100, 155]. An extensive number of DL methods have been proposed recently [10], and these methods can be broadly classified into many algorithms that will be discussed in Section 3.
4 An overview on diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease
Diagnosis (i.e., classification) is an important area in computer science concerning the number of published articles recently [43, 151]. The AD diagnosis process passes through many stages to detect the disease and classify it as shown in Fig. 3.
From Fig. 3, the first stage is the data acquisition process for gathering the dataset required for diagnosis. The second stage is preprocessing the dataset to enhance the dataset quality and improve the performance of the classification task. The third stage is the splitting stage. The dataset can be split into training, testing, and validation subsets. The last stage is a learning system with proper and specific techniques to extract the features, learn from the data, update the parameters, and classify the disease to a specific class. The following subsections discuss these stages in detail.
4.1 Data acquisition stage
The first stage is the acquisition of raw data. Information in images describes inner aspects of the body that can be taken with different modalities or techniques. In this process, we can collect neuroimaging images that may utilize different physical principles. There are different modalities of neuroimaging such as (1) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), (2) Positron Emission Tomography (PET), (3) functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), and (4) Computed Tomography (CT) [138]. Selecting one of these modalities depends on the researcher’s choice, task, and the used model. Datasets can be acquired from different organizations such as hospitals, clinical centers, radiology centers, and online websites [149].
4.1.1 Biomarkers and neuroimaging for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis
Conventionally, the clinical diagnosis of dementia has concentrated on (1) clinical assessment, (2) neuropsychological testing, and (3) the exclusion of other possible causes [102]. Normally, the diagnosing of AD can be accomplished with three altered methods, as depicted in Fig. 4.
From Fig. 4, these three methodologies are (1) Memory test through history and discussion, mental status test, and neuropsychological tests. (2) numerical laboratory, and (3) brain imaging scan [21]. There has been a revolution in the part played by neuroimaging in AD study and practice in the last years. Diagnostically, imaging has motivated from a slight exclusionary role to a crucial position [72]. In research, imaging is aiding address numerous scientific interrogations. Concurrently the probability of brain imaging has extended rapidly with new modalities and innovative ways of acquiring images and of analyzing them [141]. The definite modalities included are magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; both structural and functional) and positron emission tomography (PET; for assessment of both cerebral metabolism and amyloid).
Imaging Module and Types
These modalities have different strengths and limitations and as a result, have different and often balancing roles and scope [108]. Although additional data are required, imaging is preliminary to offer prognostic information at this premature preclinical phase. The necessity for an earlier and more definite diagnosis will only grow as disease-modifying therapies are identified [40]. This will be particularly true if, as expected, these therapies work best (or only) when introduced at the preclinical stage. Table 4 summarizes the different brain imaging in AD [73].
In Table 4, it compares advantage and disadvantage between neuroimaging modalities and shows open research area for three modalities. Brain imaging has different scans depend on the type of disease, there are CT, MRI, and PET imaging. Structural imaging provides information about the shape, and volume of the brain like CT and MRI, functional imaging showing activity of the brain and how cells work.
4.2 Preprocessing techniques
Datasets, especially images, may contain noise and distortions. Radiography noise is generally caused by changes in the sensitivity of the detector, diminished illumination of the object (i.e., low contrast), photographic limitations, and spontaneous variations in the radiation signal [111]. So, it is essential to preprocess the data to enhance its quality or to optimize its geometric and intensity patterns [107]. Preprocessing lets researchers concentrate on a specific part of the brain and highlights the most vital information that is required in the classification process. Preprocessing techniques are many and the most common ones are depicted in Fig. 5.
Figure 5, divide AD diagnosis into two mainly step. Firstly, preprocessing techniques on images. Secondly, techniques which used in learning and classify diseases. Choosing one of these techniques according to the problem that the researcher wants to solve and the type of input data.
4.2.1 Intensity normalization
It is an essential preprocessing technique that is used for mapping the intensity of all image pixels to a reference scale [133]. In general, data collected from different sources, or the same source but at different points of time, may not have identical intensity ranges [120]. For example, normalization can calibrate different pixels to the normal distribution as depicted in Fig. 6 [115].
Before and After Normalization Appliance [115]
4.2.2 Contrast enhancement
Contrast enhancement is the difference between the highest and smallest pixel intensities as shown in Eq. 1. It improves the quality of images and increases the contrast of borders in the image that helps us to differentiate between organs. It improves the brightness of the image by expanding the range of pixel values as well [80].
where fmin is the minimum value, fmax is the maximum value, f(x, y) is the value of each pixel in the image, and g(x, y) is the enhanced pixel after that image contrast is applied [117]. Figure 7 shows a sample MRI axial brain image with high contrast.
4.2.3 Denoising process
Median filter
The median filter is a technique that is used to minimize noise without blurring the edges [110]. It is especially appropriate for the enhancement of the required MRI images. The median filter identifies pixels as noise by matching each pixel in the image to its neighboring pixels [117]. It contains a filter (i.e., kernel) with a specific size that passes through each pixel value in the image and replaces it with the corresponding median value. The median value is determined by sorting the surrounding pixels’ values and then replaces the pixel with the corresponding middle pixel value [127]. Figure 8 shows the effect of applying the median filter on a sample image where the filter had s size of (3 * 3).
Gaussian filter
Gaussian filtering is a technique that helps to denoising the image and is performed by detecting the size of the mask as shown in Eq. 2 [159].
where σ is the standard deviation and defines how the Gaussian looks like, μ is the mean value, and x is the input value. Figure 9 shows the effect of applying the Gaussian filter on a sample image by using a mask size of (3 * 3).
4.2.4 Brain extraction and skull stripping
It is one of the preprocessing techniques that remove any non-brain tissues such as eyes, necks, and skulls. It segments these by using the dark space between the skull and brain occupied by the Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). There are many tools presented in [75], that are used in brain extraction, such as the brain extraction tool ROBEX algorithm that uses machine learning. It may use DL also, but it will be a more extensive computational process and will need specific hardware to be able to run the algorithm. Khademi et al. [75] used the Random Forest classifier for brain extraction. They targeted to find a binary segmentation mask for the brain. After getting that mask, they multiplied it with the original image as shown in Fig. 10 [126].
Brain Extraction with a Binary Segmentation Mask [75]
4.2.5 Data augmentation
Data augmentation techniques help our model to avoid the overfitting problem [126]. The meaning of the overfitting is increasing in validation error with decreasing training error value so to build the best model, validation error must still decrease with training error [5]. After collecting your data, we can apply data augmentation to increase the images’ diversity in each class. There are different techniques such as cropping, shifting, shearing, scaling, and zooming [95].
From Table 5, A literature review about preprocessing techniques and what is the methodology used to diagnosis AD. Also, we present the advantage and effectiveness of preprocessing on the images and show the performance of the training model.
4.3 Classification
DL, as mentioned earlier, is a sub-field of ML [24]. DL is more effective than the traditional ways of ML because it extracts the features automatically [37]. Also, DL performs “end-to-end learning” where raw data and tasks are provided to the network [17]. Most researchers depended on Convolutional Neural Network approaches for detecting Alzheimer’s disease from MRI images compared to other techniques of DL such as Recurrent Neural Networks (as shown in Fig. 11(b)), Deep Neural Networks (as shown in Fig. 11(a)), Autoencoder (as shown in Fig. 11(c)), and Deep Belief Networks (as shown in Fig. 11(d)) [8, 62].
4.3.1 Deep neural network (DNN)
DNN, as shown in Fig. 11(a), has an input layer, output layer, and one (or more) hidden layers [50]. It is distinguished by dealing with complicated problems and understanding the relationship between input and output data, also able to model complex non-linear relationships [42]. It considers supervised learning techniques and is used in various areas of research to explore patterns between inputs that were unknown before [68]. It requires a large number of training data to extract the features of the labeled images [98].
4.3.2 Convolution neural network (CNN)
A CNN is one of the most successful techniques to perform image classification and recognition in neural networks. From Fig. 12, CNN is composed of several convolution layers, pooling layers, activation layers, fully connected layers, and a classifier layer.
The convolution layer is an essential layer that extracts the feature maps bypassing the learned filter (or kernel) with a specific size of the input image [42]. Then, it follows up the activation function that decides whether the neuron should be activated or not. It makes the nonlinear transformation to the input making it capable to learn and perform more complex tasks [2]. Activation functions have numerous types such as sigmoid, Tanh, and ReLU to create feature maps [123]. Pooling layers reduce the dimensionality but keep the most important features. They can be considered as down-scalers [41]. A fully connected layer connects every neuron from the previous layer to all neurons in the current layer. Finally, the classifier layer selects a class (i.e., label) with the highest probabilities [7].
One important thing in CNN is that it can handle large datasets to get high performance in the classification task [53]. From the transfer learning point of view [140], CNN has several architectures that were trained on the ImageNet dataset including VGGNet, LeNet, GoogLeNet, ResNet, AlexNet [118]. With a pre-trained CNN model, the developer can benefit from the parameters (i.e., weights) of that model and transfer them to the new task [128, 150].
4.3.3 Recurrent neural network (RNN)
RNN is used in sequence- or time-series problems [91]. The most important advantage in that approach is the used memory and hidden state. Figure 11(b) shows a sample RNN architecture with an input, a hidden, and an output layer. The hidden state is effective in remembering the confident information about the problem sequence [106]. Another distinguishing characteristic of RNN is that they share the same parameters within each layer in the network unlike the feedforward networks [65]. The later networks, the feedforward networks, have different parameters for each node in the networks thus causing a large number of parameters [114].
RNN does not have a large number of layers and is not too deep compared to CNN’s or DNNs [88]. However, the model is difficult to train and suffers from vanishing or exploding gradients limiting its application for modeling long-time activity sequence and temporal dependencies in sensor data [81]. The common applications of RNNs are natural language processing [154], speech recognition [57], and language translation [27].
Long short-term memory (LSTM) and Gated recurrent units (GRUs) are common architectures of RNN [36]. The main purpose of the LSTM is to maintain any error that occurs through the different layers and times [96]. It contains cells in the hidden layer, which have three gates: input, output, and forget gate. These gates are responsible for storing the information and regulating the flow of information to predict the output of the network [114]. This single-cell helps the model to decide which one to stock and when it can read and update the information through the gates [98]. GRUs use a hidden state and have two gates: reset gate and update gate. They control what and how much information will be retained [114]. Its performance, in many tasks, is better than LSTM [36, 42].
4.3.4 Autoencoder (AE)
AE is an unsupervised learning technique and can take an unlabeled dataset and compress it to feature encoded data. It is used for dimensionality reduction and consists of two major parts: an encoder and a decoder, as shown in Fig. 11(c) [98]. The encoder converts the input data to code (i.e., compressed data) and then the decoder rebuilds the code to the output which looks like the input [105]. Layers in the encoder part may be dense layers or convolution layers. The number of layers in the encoding part must be equal to the layers in the decoding part. The encoder reduces the dimensions of data, but it increases the dimensions of data [103]. The middle layer is called the bottleneck layer that compresses the representation of the input data [48].
AE has different types that improve the performance named (1) denoising AE, (2) sparse AE, and (3) contractive AE [1]. AE faces some problems such as a copy of the input layer to the hidden layer causes inefficient extraction of the meaningful features although it can retrieve the input in the output layer [134]. Denoising AE solves that problem by corrupting the inputs that the AE must then reconstruct or denoising [34]. This helps the model to recognize the feature from noisy input and hence can classify. The model does not copy the input to the output without learning features about data.
The sparse AE added many constraints to reduce the number of hidden nodes and limit nodes that were activated [135]. When the average of activation of the hidden nodes is close to zero this means nodes in the hidden layer are active and the other not active [147]. It can learn features by imposing some penalty, it is applying on the hidden layer. There are two ways to put sparsity constraint: (1) L1 regularization that is added to cost function which helps in preventing the overfitting problem [93] and (2) KL-Divergence constraint that is added to all hidden nodes to provide a low average activation value [11]. The main purpose of contractive AE is to support strong representation which will be able to extract useful information and be less sensitive to small variations in data [124].
4.3.5 Deep belief network (DBN)
DBN is a supervised learning technique that can link the unsupervised features, which are extracted from the stacked layer [70]. It is a generative graphical model and is constructed by a stack of Restricted Boltzmann machines (RBM) which can extract features and reconstruct the input. DBN has an undirected connection between the top of two layers as depicted in Fig. 11(d). DBN reduces the weight initialization by using RBM that helps the model overcome the overfitting problem [70].
DBN was created to analyze the apparent distribution between the input and the hidden layers in such a way that the lower layer node is connected directly, and the upper layer nodes are connected indirectly [92]. This model is helpful in a task that needs to extract features, involving biological data, and with classes that are not separated linearly [13].
Finally, the authors summarize the DL branches including the different models graphically in Fig. 13.
5 Research challenges
In this section, we present some of the research challenges that can be divided into two categories (1) the first is related to the data, (2) the second is related to the classification problem. The important challenges for each category are highlighted in the following subsections. The authors summarize the challenges section in Fig. 14 and discussed it in detail in the following subsections.
5.1 Availability of large datasets
To achieve the best result, DL techniques require a large number of datasets for the training process. Unavailability of data is a major challenge as it is difficult to acquire data from hospitals and clinical centers due to the privacy of patients. A set of online medical datasets available for a researcher for example ADNI (Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative), OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set), COBRE (CENTR for biomedical research excellence), and the FBIRN (Function Biomedical Informatics Research Network). To overcome the small diversity of the available datasets, data augmentation is a technique that is used to increase the number of images without adding a new image by flipping, padding, rotation, etc. Table 6 summarizes the different methods used in different studies to solve the issue of limiting datasets.
In Table 6, we compare different studies how they overcome the limitation of availability of data. We compared their advantage, disadvantage, type of image modalities, datasets, and methods they used for overcoming this problem.
5.1.1 Alzheimer disease datasets
To have the ability to train systems and compare performance between architecture by using a different dataset, large datasets are required for training, testing, and validation. Table 7, summarize the dataset of AD with their links. ADNI dataset is a multicenter study that aims to develop imaging, clinical, and genetic for tracking the growth of disease and to detect AD at the early stage (pre-dementia). There are 6 classes: Patient = 28, CN = 834, MCI = 671, EMCI = 340, LMCI = 185, AD = 450, SMC = 115.
OASIS is a collection of neuroimaging data sets that are open access for research and analysis. On XNAT Central, you may see and download 3-OASIS datasets. OASIS-1 is a collection of cross-sectional MRI data from 434 scan sessions including 416 participants. It was first released in 2007. OASIS-2 is a collection of longitudinal MRI data from 373 imaging sessions in 150 people. In 2010, it was made available. OASIS-3 is made up of 1098 subjects’ cross-sectional and longitudinal MRI and PET data. It was released in the year 2018.
Alzheimer’s Dataset (4 classes of images) is from open access Kaggle website that consisting MRI images. The dataset contains two files training and testing each of them containing 5121 and 1279 images respectively. There are 4 classes in training file: Mild Demented = 717, Very Mild Demented = 1792, Moderate Demented = 52, Non Demented = 2560.
MIRIAD is a database of volumetric MRI brain-scan of 46 Alzheimer’s sufferers and 23 healthy elderly people. It includes a total of 708 scans and should be of particular interest for work on longitudinal biomarkers and image analysis. It is also an open-access dataset.
Table 7, presents available datasets with their links, the number of available images, shows the number of classes,s and is open access for the researcher or not?.
5.2 Overcoming data imbalance problem
Data imbalance is one of the problems that face researchers when they solve any problem by using DL. We may describe this as the distribution of examples across classes is not equal. For example, in the AD dataset, the number of images that have a disease is larger than images with no disease in which will cause an imbalance in the dataset [71].
There are different suggestions to solve this problem as shown in Table 8. Under-sampling and oversampling are two common techniques to enhance the data imbalance problem. Under-sampling is done by deleting data randomly which have enough amount of data in class to balance between classes [113]. It helps in obtaining an equal number of samples in classes and fast training time. Although the simplicity of that approach, there is a high probability that the data which we are deleting may have essential information or features for the classification of this class.
Over-sampling means increasing the amount of data by copying the existing sample. So, to achieve balanced classes, increase the size of the minority class. This process is done on the minority class which has a smaller number of data than other classes. Overfitting is the major issue that occurs with over-sampling [113].
In Table 8, we compare different studies on how they overcome the problem of data imbalance. We compared their advantage, disadvantage, type of image modalities, datasets, and methods they used for overcoming how to make different classes have the same number of images.
5.3 Multimodality images in classification
There is different scan type for neuroimaging such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Computed Tomography (CT). Learning the model used in this different modality is another challenge. Learning Heterogeneity data may cause less performance because all input data are different and combine [82]. To solve this problem every single modality is learning separately by multi hidden layers to extract features then the second stage is combining features from the last hidden layer of each modality and then learn a model to classify labels by using combined features from the last stage.
A combination of features from different modalities has high performance than a training model with a single modality. Each neuroimage modality can offer new different details for the disease that make classification more effective [18]. Table 9 shows a summary of the different methods of the papers used in solving a combination of different modalities of the images.
In Table 9, we compare different studies which used different modalities of images in the learning model. We compared their advantage, disadvantage, type of image modalities, datasets, which classifier they used, and methods they used for overcoming this problem.
5.4 Collecting necessary information
MRI images may have some information that is unnecessary for diagnosis of AD that increases the time of processing and training data, computational process, and cause less efficiency in the training of our classification model [90]. The solution for this challenge is using techniques for preprocessing data before training it as shown in Table 10. It summarizes some of the related articles that solve this problem. It is worth mentioning that FreeSurfer is a free tool from the internet used for processing images like skull stripping, segmentation for the essential part of the brain for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease [22].
In Table 10, we compare different studies on how they collecting important information in images and how to discard other information. We compared their advantage, disadvantage, type of image modalities, datasets, and methods they used for overcoming this problem.
5.5 Neuroimages noise manipulation
Adversarial noise may be found in neuroimages and this reduces the performance of the classification process. To minimize noise, as we mentioned before in Fig. 5, we present some preprocessing techniques that help in removing the noise from images as shown in Table 11. It summarizes the different methods that are used in removing noise from neuroimages. Gaussian filter, median filter, and many filters that remove noise from images increase the quality of training of the classification model.
In Table 11, we compare different studies which have datasets or images with noise. We compared their advantage, disadvantage, type of image modalities, datasets, which classifier they used, and methods they used for overcoming neuroimaging noise.
5.6 Overfitting problem
Overfitting happens when the model is trained on data that have noise and more unuseful details. The size of data used for training may not be enough is also one of the reasons that cause overfitting in this case to solve this problem we need to increase the amount of data [59]. To overcome this problem, the dropout can be used to drop the units (i.e., hidden and visible) in a neural network as shown in Table 12 [130]. In it, some articles used that method and others solve that problem in another way. This means removing the units temporarily from the network. Thereby, choosing a random sample of neurons to train rather than train whole neurons in the network. This can make the learning of the hidden layer better.
In Table 12, we compare different studies in which their architecture suffers from an overfitting problem. We compared their advantage, which classifier they used, methods they used for overcoming overfitting problems, and shows the performance of each study.
5.7 Hybrid approach
The hybrid model is defined as combining more than an approach or technique to achieve high performance or enhance the training and classification process [99]. One example of a hybrid method is feature selector and CNN model, feature selector with the pre-trained model or transfer learning, and hyperparameters optimizer with any model of DL. As shown in Table 13, some of the articles combined more than one learning method or classification technique to enhance the overall classification of the disease.
In Table 13, we compare different studies which used a hybrid approach in their studies. We compared methods they used for combining more than one model, shows the performance of each model, type of image, datasets that they used, which classifier they used, and our comments about their methods.
5.8 Black box challenges
One of the trending issues is the black box. Neural networks, which can be thought of as black boxes that convert input into output, are often used in machine learning methods [49]. Although math used to construct a neural network is straightforward how the output arrived is exceedingly complicated, ML algorithms get a bunch of data as input, identify patterns, and build a predictive model but understanding how the model worked is an issue [85].
Although DL has the most success in achieving high performance close to human in classification and predicting process, operate as black boxes [49]. It doesn’t offer a specific reason or explanation for choosing a specific feature in the training process or why this achieves high or low performance or how the training data’s relations are reflected in the feature selection as shown in Table 14 [25].
In Table 14, we compare different studies about black box challenges. We compared their model, shows the performance of each model, the type of image, datasets that they used, which classifier they used, their contribution, and our comments about their methods.
6 Future directions
By revising the most recent literature on early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, it was concluded that. To achieve overall improvement and upgrading the accuracy of diagnosis using a computer application, the following points must be taken into account:
-
One of the challenges is collecting brain-balanced and sufficient data related to Alzheimer’s disease [60, 119, 125, 131].
-
Most of the recently deployed methods and techniques correlated to DL, including deep sparse multi-task learning [131], stacked auto-encoder [137], and sparse regression models [132], each is attempting to overcome the aforementioned challenges. In [119], proposed a deep architecture to remove the features without load redundant information by using sparse multi-task learning in a hierarchy.
-
Deep learning segmentation (e.g., U-Nets) can be injected in the process to specify only the region of interest.
-
Combining two various conceptual methods of sparse regression and DL to diagnose AD can be effective [125]. Also, one of the promising techniques is the manifold-based learning method.
-
Data augmentation and scaling techniques can help to improve the overall state-of-the-art performance.
7 Limitations
All studies have both strengths and weak points so, we have several limitations. First, we mentioned only the most common preprocessing techniques (intensity normalization, contrast enhancement, De-noising process, brain extraction, and data augmentation) that are used with neuroimaging. Second, we discussed only five techniques of DL (DNN, ANN, CNN, AE, and DBN) although there are many approaches we mentioned the most common one with a diagnosis of AD. Third, ML is not discussed in detail as DL. Finally, we mentioned four datasets, not all of them, and the current study works on ten years of study.
8 Conclusions and future work
AD is a cumulative neurological disorder that is the most common form of late dementia. AD causes nerve cell death and tissue loss in the brain, resulting in a substantial decrease in brain volume over time and impairment of most of its functions. In this paper, we started with the big difference between traditional ML and DL, followed by the stage of diagnosis of AD. In the diagnosis of AD, we need to preprocess images to enhance the quality of learning, so we show some preprocessing techniques used with images. And also, we presented different methods of DL that are most common in the classification process such as CNN, RNN, DNN, AE, and DBN. Although the importance of the classification of disease by using DL, there are challenges for dealing with the dataset.so, we presented a review of literature for every challenge and show their suggestion to solve these problems. The novelty of the current survey can be summarized in (1) introduce different preprocessing techniques which processed on neuroimaging, (2) combine preprocessing techniques with the most common DL methods in one survey, (3) compared different state-of-art research with their challenges in dealing with dataset and classification stage. In future studies, to classify AD with the proper dataset, we can use (1) Abstract CNN Models, (2) apply transfer learning only, (3) apply both transfer learning with abstract CNN models, (4) use feature selector to select feature separately and after that using CNN models, (5) use feature selector to select feature separately and after that using transfer learning, (6) compare the performance of two models that mentioned in 4 and 5 points, and (7) using hyperparameters optimizer with one of the models like CNN or transfer learning.
Data availability
We confirm that no datasets were users, generated, or analyzed during the current study.
References
Aamir M, Nawi NM, Mahdin HB, Naseem R, Zulqarnain M (2020) Auto-encoder variants for solving handwritten digits classification problem. Int J Fuzzy Logic Intell Syst 20(1):8–16
Activation function neural network (2020) https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/activation-functions-neural-networks/
Aderghal K, Khvostikov A, Krylov A, Benois-Pineau J, Afdel K, Catheline G (2018) Classification of Alzheimer disease on imaging modalities with Deep CNNs using cross-modal transfer Learning. 2018 IEEE 31st international symposium on computer-Based medical systems (CBMS). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/cbms.2018.00067
Advantages and disadvantages of functional MRI (2019) https://www.ed.ac.uk/clinical-sciences/edinburgh-imaging/research/themes-and-topics/medical-physics/imaging-techniques/functional-mri
Afzal S, Maqsood M, Nazir F, Khan U, Aadil F, Awan KM, … Song O-Y (2019) A data augmentation based framework to handle class imbalance problem for Alzheimer’s stage detection. IEEE access, 1–1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2932786
Akkus Z, Galimzianova A, Hoogi A, Rubin DL, Erickson BJ (2017) Deep Learning for brain MRI segmentation: state of the art and future directions. J Digit Imaging 30(4):449–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-9983-4
Albawi S, Mohammed TA, Al-Zawi S (2017) Understanding of a convolutional neural network. In 2017 international conference on engineering and technology (ICET) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEngTechnol.2017.8308186
Aldweesh A, Derhab A, Emam AZ (2020) Deep learning approaches for anomaly-based intrusion detection systems: a survey, taxonomy, and open issues. Knowl-Based Syst 189:105124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105124
Al-Naami B, Gharaibeh N, Kheshman AA (2013) Automated detection of Alzheimer disease using region growing technique and artificial neural network World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Biomed Biol Eng, 7(5)
Alom MZ, Taha TM, Yakopcic C, Westberg S, Sidike P, Nasrin MS, Hasan M, van Essen BC, Awwal AAS, Asari VK (2019) A state-of-the-art survey on deep learning theory and architectures. Electronics 8(3):292. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8030292
Al-Qatf M, Lasheng Y, Alhabib M, Al-Sabahi K (2018) Deep Learning approach combining sparse Autoen-coder with SVM for network intrusion detection. IEEE Access 6:1–52856. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2869577
Amen DG (2015) Change your brain, Change Your Life (Revised and Expanded): The Breakthrough Program for Conquering Anxiety, Depression, Obsessiveness, Lack of Focus, Anger, and Memory Problems. Harmony
An N, Jin L, Ding H, Yang J, Yuan J (2020) A deep belief network-based method to identify proteomic risk markers for Alzheimer disease. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.05776
Ayodele TO (2010) Types of machine Learning algorithms. New Adv Mach Learn. https://doi.org/10.5772/9385
Bardis MD, Houshyar R, Chang PD, Ushinsky A, Glavis-Bloom J, Chahine C, … Chow DS (2020) Applications of artificial intelligence to prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI): Current and emerging trends. Cancers 12(5):1204. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12051204
Basaia S, Agosta F, Wagner L, Canu E, Magnani G, Santangelo R, Filippi M (2018) Automated classification of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment using a single MRI and deep neural networks. NeuroImage: Clinical, 101645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.101645
Bashar A (2019) Survey on evolving deep learning neural network architectures. J Artificial Intell 1(02):73–82. https://doi.org/10.36548/jaicn.2019.2.003
Baskar D, Jayanthi VS, Jayanthi AN (2019) An efficient classification approach for detection of Alzheimer’s disease from biomedical imaging modalities. Multimed Tools Appl 78(10):12883–12915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6287-8
Bi X, Zhao X, Huang H, Chen D, Ma Y (2020) Functional brain network classification for Alzheimer’s disease detection with deep features and extreme learning machine. Cogn Comput 12(3):513–527 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12559-019-09688-2
Borghesani PR, Johnson LC, Shelton AL, Peskind ER, Aylward EH, Schellenberg GD, Cherrier MM (2008) Altered medial temporal lobe responses during visuospatial encoding in healthy APOE* 4 carriers. Neurobiol Aging 29(7):981–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.01.012
Brown J (2015) The use and misuse of short cognitive tests in the diagnosis of dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 86(6):680–685. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2014-309086
Brown EM, Pierce ME, Clark DC, Fischl BR, Iglesias JE, Milberg WP, McGlinchey RE, Salat DH (2020) Test-retest reliability of FreeSurfer automated hippocampal subfield segmentation within and across scanners. Neuroimage 210:116563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116563
Busche MA, Eichhoff G, Adelsberger H, Abramowski D, Wiederhold KH, Haass C, Staufenbiel M, Konnerth A, Garaschuk O (2008) Clusters of hyperactive neurons near amyloid plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Science 321(5896):1686–1689. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162844
Çayir A, Yenidoğan I, Dağ H (2018) Feature extraction based on deep learning for some traditional machine learning methods. In 2018 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK) (pp. 494-497). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/UBMK.2018.8566383
Chakraborty S, Tomsett R, Raghavendra R, Harborne D, Alzantot M, Cerutti F, … Gurram P (2017) Interpretability of deep learning models: A survey of results. 2017 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/uic-atc.2017.8397411
Chen Z, Zhang T, Ouyang C (2018a) End-to-end airplane detection using transfer learning in remote sensing images. Remote Sens 10(1):139. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10010139
Chen J, Yan S, Wong KC (2018b) Verbal aggression detection on twitter comments: convolutional neural network for short-text sentiment analysis. Neural Comput & Applic:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3442-0
Chitradevi D, Prabha S (2020) Analysis of brain sub regions using optimization techniques and deep learning method in Alzheimer disease. Appl Soft Comput 86:105857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105857
Choi BK, Madusanka N, Choi HK, So JH, Kim CH, Park HG, Bhattacharjee S, Prakash D (2020a) Convolutional neural network-based mr image analysis for Alzheimer’s disease classification. Current Med Imag 16(1):27–35. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573405615666191021123854
Choi BK, Madusanka N, Choi HK, So JH, Kim CH, Park HG, Bhattacharjee S, Prakash D (2020b) Convolutional neural network-based mri image analysis for Alzheimer’s disease classification. Current Med Imaging 16(1):27–35. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573405615666191021123854
Cui R, Liu M (2019) RNN-based longitudinal analysis for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Comput Med Imaging Graph 73:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2019.01.005
de Marvao A, Dawes TJ, O'Regan DP (2020) Artificial intelligence for cardiac imaging-genetics research. Front Cardiovasc Med 6:195. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00195
Deng L, Platt JC (2014) Ensemble deep learning for speech recognition. In Fifteenth annual conference of the international speech communication association
Denoising autoencoder (n.d.). https://paperswithcode.com/method/denoising-autoencoder
Ding Y, Sohn JH, Kawczynski MG, Trivedi H, Harnish R, Jenkins NW, Lituiev D, Copeland TP, Aboian MS, Mari Aparici C, Behr SC, Flavell RR, Huang SY, Zalocusky KA, Nardo L, Seo Y, Hawkins RA, Hernandez Pampaloni M, Hadley D, Franc BL (2018) A Deep Learning model to predict a diagnosis of Alzheimer disease by using 18F-FDG PET of the brain. Radiology 180958:456–464. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018180958
DiPietro R, Hager GD (2020) Deep learning: RNNs and LSTM. In handbook of medical image computing and computer assisted intervention (pp. 503-519). Academic press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816176-0.00026-0
Dong B, Wang X (2016) Comparison deep learning method to traditional methods using for network intrusion detection. In 2016 8th IEEE international conference on communication software and networks (ICCSN) (pp. 581-585). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSN.2016.7586590
Dua M, Makhija D, Manasa PYL, Mishra P (2020) A CNN–RNN–LSTM Based amalgamation for Alzheimer’s disease detection. J Med Biol Eng 40:688–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-020-00556-1
Dubois B, Picard G, Sarazin M (2009a) Early detection of Alzheimer's disease: new diagnostic criteria. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 11(2):135–139. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2009.11.2/bdubois
Dubois B, Picard G, Sarazin M (2009b) Early detection of Alzheimer's disease: new diagnostic criteria. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 11(2):135. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2009.11.2/bdubois
Ebrahim D, Ali-Eldin AM, Moustafa HE, Arafat H (2020) Alzheimer disease early detection using convolutional neural networks. In 2020 15th international conference on computer engineering and systems (ICCES) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCES51560.2020.9334594.
Ebrahimighahnavieh MA, Chiong DR (2019) Deep Learning to detect Alzheimer’s disease from neuroimaging: a systematic literature Review. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 105242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105242
Esmaeilzadeh S, Belivanis DI, Pohl KM, Adeli E (2018) End-to-end Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis and biomarker identification. In: International workshop on machine Learning in medical imaging, vol 11046. Springer, Cham, pp 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00919-9_39
Farooq A, Anwar S, Awais M, Rehman S (2017) A deep CNN based multi-class classification of Alzheimer’s disease using MRI. 2017 IEEE international conference on imaging systems and techniques (IST). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ist.2017.8261460
Feng W, Halm-Lutterodt NV, Tang H, Mecum A, Mesregah MK, Ma Y, Li H, Zhang F, Wu Z, Yao E, Guo X (2020) Automated MRI-Based Deep Learning model for detection of Alzheimer’s disease process. Int J Neural Syst 30(06):2050032. https://doi.org/10.1142/s012906572050032x
Folego G, Weiler M, Casseb RF, Pires R, Rocha A (2020) Alzheimer's disease detection through whole-brain 3D-CNN MRI. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.534592
Fu’adah YN, Wijayanto I, Pratiwi NKC, Taliningsih FF, Rizal S, Pramudito MA (1844) Automated classification of Alzheimer’s disease Based on MRI image Processing using convolutional neural network (CNN) with AlexNet architecture. J Phys Conf Ser 2021(1):012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1844/1/012020
Glossary of Deep Learning: Autoencoder (2017) https://medium.com/deeper-learning/glossary-of-deep-learning-autoencoder-1044ec82c300
Guidotti R, Monreale A, Ruggieri S, Turini F, Giannotti F, Pedreschi D (2018) A survey of methods for explaining black box models. ACM Comput Surveys (CSUR) 51(5):1–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236009
Gulhare KK, Shukla SP, Sharma LK (2017) Deep neural network classification method to Alzheimer’s disease detection. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Softw Eng 7(6):1–4
Guo K, Xu T, Kui X, Zhang R, Chi T (2019) iFusion: towards efficient intelligence fusion for deep learning from real-time and heterogeneous data. Information Fusion 51:215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.02.008
Gupta Y, Lee KH, Choi KY, Lee JJ, Kim BC, Kwon G-R (2019) Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis Based on cortical and subcortical features. J Healthcare Eng 2019:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2492719
Han D, Liu Q, Fan W (2018) A new image classification method using CNN transfer learning and web data augmentation. Expert Syst Appl 95:43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.11.028
Hazarika RA, Kharkongor K, Sanyal S, Maji AK (2020) A comparative study on different skull stripping techniques from brain magnetic resonance imaging. In: In international conference on innovative computing and communications. Springer, Singapore, pp 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1286-5_24
Hazarika RA, Maji AK, Sur SN, Paul BS, Kandar D (2021) A survey on classification algorithms of brain images in Alzheimer’s disease Based on feature extraction techniques. IEEE Access 9:58503–58536. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.307255
Herrera LJ, Rojas I, Pomares H, Guillén A, Valenzuela O, Baños O (2013) Classification of MRI images for Alzheimer's disease detection. In 2013 international conference on social computing (pp. 846-851). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom.2013.127
Hori T, Chen Z, Erdogan H, Hershey JR, Le Roux J, Mitra V, Watanabe S (2017) Multi-microphone speech recognition integrating beamforming, robust feature extraction, and advanced DNN/RNN backend. Comput Speech Lang 46:401–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2017.01.013
Hosseini MP, Lu S, Kamaraj K, Slowikowski A, Venkatesh HC (2020) Deep learning architectures. In: Deep learning: concepts and architectures. Springer, Cham, pp 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31756-0_1
How to Avoid Overfitting in Deep Learning Neural Networks (2019) https://machinelearningmastery.com/introduction-to-regularization-to-reduce-overfitting-and-improve-generalization-error/
Hu C, Ju R, Shen Y, Zhou P, Li Q (2016) Clinical decision support for Alzheimer’s disease based on deep learning and brain network. In: Communications (ICC), 2016 IEEE international conference on, IEEE. pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2016.7510831.
Ibrahim A, Mohammed S, Ali HA, Hussein SE (2020a) Breast cancer segmentation from thermal images based on chaotic Salp swarm algorithm. IEEE Access 8:122121–122134. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007336
Ibrahim A, Mohammed S, Ali HA, Hussein SE (2020b) Breast cancer segmentation from thermal images based on chaotic Salp swarm algorithm. IEEE Access 8:122121–122134. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007336
Irankhah E (2020) Evaluation of early detection methods for Alzheimer’s. Bioprocess Eng 4(1):17–22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.be.20200401.13
Islam T, Manivannan D (2017) Predicting application failure in cloud: a machine Learning approach. 2017 IEEE international conference on cognitive computing (ICCC). https://doi.org/10.1109/ieee.iccc.2017.11
Jain A, Zamir AR, Savarese S, Saxena A (2016) Structural-rnn: Deep learning on spatio-temporal graphs. In proceedings of the ieee conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 5308-5317)
Jain R, Jain N, Aggarwal A, Jude Hemanth D (2019a) Convolutional neural network-based Alzheimer’s disease classification from magnetic resonance brain images. Cogn Syst Res 57:147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.12.015
Jain R, Jain N, Aggarwal A, Jude Hemanth D (2019b) Convolutional neural network based Alzheimer’s disease classification from magnetic resonance brain images. Cogn Syst Res 57:147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.12.015
JayaLakshmi ANM, Kishore KK (2018) Performance evaluation of DNN with other machine learning techniques in a cluster using apache spark and MLlib. J King Saud Univ-Comput Inform Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.09.022
Jemwa GT, Aldrich C (2005) Improving process operations using support vector machines and decision trees. AICHE J 51(2):526–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.10315
Jo T, Nho K, Saykin AJ (2019) Deep Learning in Alzheimer’s disease: diagnostic classification and prognostic prediction using neuroimaging data. Front Aging Neurosci 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2019.00220
Johnson JM, Khoshgoftaar TM (2019) Survey on deep learning with class imbalance. J Big Data 6(1):1–54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0192-5
Johnson KA, Fox NC, Sperling RA, Klunk WE (2012a) Brain imaging in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 2(4):a006213–a006213. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a006213
Johnson KA, Fox NC, Sperling RA, Klunk WE (2012b) Brain imaging in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Med 2(4):a006213. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a006213
Kazemi Y, Houghten S (2018) A deep learning pipeline to classify different stages of Alzheimer’s disease from fMRI data. 2018 IEEE conference on Computational Intelligence in bioinformatics and Computational biology (CIBCB). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/cibcb.2018.8404980
Khademi A, Reiche B, DiGregorio J, Arezza G, Moody AR (2019) Whole volume brain extraction for multi-Centre. Multi-Disease FLAIR MRI Datasets Magnetic Resonance Imaging 66:116–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2019.08.022
Khagi B, Kwon GR (2020) 3D CNN design for the classification of Alzheimer’s disease using brain MRI and PET. IEEE Access 8:217830–217847. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3040486
Khagi B, Kwon GR, Lama R (2019) Comparative analysis of Alzheimer's disease classification by CDR level using CNN, feature selection, and machine-learning techniques. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 29(3):297–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/ima.22316
Khvostikov A, Aderghal K, Benois-Pineau J, Krylov A, Catheline G (2018) 3D CNN-based classification using sMRI and MD-DTI images for Alzheimer disease studies. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.05968
Kundaram SS, Pathak KC (2020) Deep Learning-Based Alzheimer disease detection. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on microelectronics, computing and communication systems, 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5546-6_50
Labeeb YA, Morsy M, Abo-Elsoud MEA (2015) Preprocessing technique for enhancing the DICOM kidney images. Int J Eng Res Technol (Ijert) 04(08):2278–0181
Lechner M, Hasani R (2020) Learning long-term dependencies in irregularly-sampled time series. Advances in neural information Processing systems, 33. arXiv:2006.04418v4
Lee G, Nho K, Kang B, Sohn K-A, Kim D (2019) Predicting Alzheimer’s disease progression using multi-modal deep learning approach. Sci Rep 9(1):1952. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37769-z
Li F, Liu M (2019) A hybrid convolutional and recurrent neural network for Hippocampus analysis in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci Methods 323:108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.05.006
Li H, Yu L, Tian S, Li L, Wang M, Lu X (2017) Deep learning in pharmacy: the prediction of aqueous solubility based on deep belief network. Autom Control Comput Sci 51(2):97–107. https://doi.org/10.3103/s0146411617020043
Lipton ZC (2018) The mythos of model interpretability: in machine learning, the concept of interpretability is both important and slippery. Queue 16(3):31–57
Liu F, Wee C-Y, Chen H, Shen D (2013) Inter-modality relationship constrained multi-task feature selection for AD/MCI classification. Lecture Notes Comput Sci:308–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40811-3_39
Liu S, Liu S, Cai W, Pujol S, Kikinis R, Feng D (2014) Early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease with deep learning," 2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Beijing, pp. 1015–1018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2014.6868045.
Lu H, Li Y, Chen M, Kim H, Serikawa S (2018) Brain intelligence: go beyond artificial intelligence. Mobile Networks Appl 23(2):368–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-017-0932-8
Machine learning and deep learning (2020) https://www.zendesk.com/blog/machine-learning-and-deep-learning/
Mehmood A, Maqsood M, Bashir M, Shuyuan Y (2020) A Deep Siamese convolution neural network for multi-class classification of Alzheimer disease. Brain Sci 10(2):84. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10020084
Ming Y, Cao S, Zhang R, Li Z, Chen Y, Song Y, Qu H (2017) Understanding hidden memories of recurrent neural networks. In 2017 IEEE conference on visual analytics science and technology (VAST) (pp. 13-24). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VAST.2017.8585721
Morabito FC, Campolo M, Ieracitano C, Mammone N (2019) Deep Learning approaches to electrophysiological multivariate time-series analysis. Artificial Intell Age Neural Networks Brain Comput:219–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815480-9.00011-6
Murugan P, Durairaj S (2017) Regularization and optimization strategies in deep convolutional neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.04711
Nawaz H, Maqsood M, Afzal S, Aadil F, Mehmood I, Rho S (2020) A deep feature-based real-time system for Alzheimer disease stage detection. Multimed Tools Appl 80:35789–35807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09087-y
Ng YS, Xue W, Wang W, Qi P (2019) Convolutional neural networks for food image recognition: An experimental study. In proceedings of the 5th international workshop on multimedia assisted dietary management (pp. 33-41). https://doi.org/10.1145/3347448.3357168
Nicholson C (2019) A beginner’s guide to lstms and recurrent neural networks. Skymind. Saatavissa: https://wiki.pathmind.com/lstm. Hakupäivä, 6, 2019
Noda K, Yamaguchi Y, Nakadai K, Okuno HG, Ogata T (2014) Audio-visual speech recognition using deep learning. Appl Intell 42(4):722–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-014-0629-7
Noor MBT, Zeina NZ, Kaiser MS, Al Mamun S, Mahmud M (2020) Application of deep learning in detecting neurological disorders from magnetic resonance images: a survey on the detection of Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and schizophrenia. Brain Informatics 7:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-020-00112-2
O’Mahony N, Campbell S, Carvalho A, Harapanahalli S, Hernandez GV, Krpalkova L, … Walsh J (2019) Deep learning vs. traditional computer vision. In: Science and Information Conference. Springer, Cham, pp 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17795-9_10
Otter DW, Medina JR, Kalita JK (2020) A survey of the usages of Deep Learning for Natural Language Processing. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 32:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnnls.2020.2979670
Pak M, Kim S (2017) A review of deep learning in image recognition. 2017 4th international conference on computer applications and information Processing technology (CAIPT). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/caipt.2017.8320684
Panza F, Frisardi V, Capurso C, D'Introno A, Colacicco AM, Imbimbo BP, Santamato A, Vendemiale G, Seripa D, Pilotto A, Capurso A, Solfrizzi V (2010) Late-life depression, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia: possible continuum? Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 18(2):98–116. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181b0fa13
Pathirage CSN, Li J, Li L, Hao H, Liu W, Ni P (2018) Structural damage identification based on autoencoder neural networks and deep learning. Eng Struct 172:13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.109
Paudel YN, Angelopoulou E, Piperi C, Othman I, Aamir K, Shaikh M (2020) Impact of HMGB1, RAGE, and TLR4 in Alzheimer’s disease (AD): from risk factors to therapeutic targeting. Cells 9(2):383. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9020383
Peng J, Guan J, Shang X (2019) Predicting Parkinson's disease genes based on node2vec and autoencoder. Front Genet 10:226. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00226
Pereira L, Pinto M, Shah K, Khan S (2020) Show and tell: a neural visual story-teller. Available at SSRN 3565282. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3565282
Perumal S, Velmurugan T (2018) Preprocessing by contrast enhancement techniques for medical images. Int J Pure Appl Mathematics 118(18):3681–3688
Pichler BJ, Judenhofer MS, Pfannenberg C (2008) Multimodal imaging approaches: pet/ct and pet/mri. Molecular Imaging I:109–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72718-7_6
Pierce AL, Bullain SS, Kawas CH (2017) Late-onset Alzheimer disease. Neurol Clin 35(2):283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2017.01.006
Qiu F, Berglund J, Jensen JR, Thakkar P, Ren D (2004) Speckle noise reduction in SAR imagery using a local adaptive median filter. GIScience & Remote Sens 41(3):244–266. https://doi.org/10.2747/1548-1603.41.3.244
Rajeshwari S, Sharmila TS (2013) Efficient quality analysis of MRI image using preprocessing techniques. IEEE Conference Inform Commun Technol. https://doi.org/10.1109/cict.2013.6558127
Ramzan F, Khan MUG, Rehmat A, Iqbal S, Saba T, Rehman A, Mehmood Z (2020) A Deep Learning approach for automated diagnosis and multi-class classification of Alzheimer’s disease stages using resting-state fMRI and residual neural networks. J Med Syst 44:37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1475-2
Random Oversampling and Undersampling for Imbalanced Classification. (2021) https://machinelearningmastery.com/random-oversampling-and-undersampling-for-imbalanced-classification/
Recurrent neural networks (2020). https://www.ibm.com/cloud/learn/recurrent-neural-networks
Sajedi H, Pardakhti N (2019) Age prediction Based on brain MRI image: a survey. J Med Syst 43(8):279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1401-7
Salehi AW, Baglat P, Sharma BB, Gupta G, Upadhya A (2020) A CNN model: earlier diagnosis and classification of Alzheimer disease using MRI. 2020 international conference on smart electronics and communication (ICOSEC). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/icosec49089.2020.9215402
Sandoub G, Atta R, Ali HA, Abdel-Kader RF (2021) A low-light image enhancement method based on bright channel prior and maximum colour channel, IET Image Processing. Institution Eng Technol 118(18):3681–3688
Sarraf S, Tofighi G (2016a) Classification of Alzheimer's disease structural MRI data by deep learning convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06583
Sarraf S, Tofighi G (2016b) Classification of Alzheimer’s disease using fmri data and deep learning convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.08631
Shah M, Xiao Y, Subbanna N, Francis S, Arnold DL, Collins DL, Arbel T (2011) Evaluating intensity normalization on MRIs of human brain with multiple sclerosis. Med Image Anal 15(2):267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2010.12.003
Shakarami A, Tarrah H, Mahdavi-Hormat A (2020) A CAD system for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease using 2D slices and an improved AlexNet-SVM method. Optik, 164237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164237
Shankar GM, Walsh DM (2009) Alzheimer’s disease: synaptic dysfunction and Aβ. Mol Neurodegener 4(1):48. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1326-4-48
Sharma S, Sharma S (2017) Activation functions in neural networks. Towards Data Sci 6(12):310–316
Shen C, Qi Y, Wang J, Cai G, Zhu Z (2018) An automatic and robust features learning method for rotating machinery fault diagnosis based on contractive autoencoder. Eng Appl Artif Intell 76:170–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2018.09.010
Shi J, Zheng X, Li Y, Zhang Q, Ying S (2017) Multimodal neuroimaging feature learning with multimodal stacked deep polynomial networks for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 22:173–183. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2017.2655720
Shorten C, Khoshgoftaar TM (2019) A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning. J Big Data 6(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0197-0
Shrestha S (2014) Image denoising using new adaptive based median filters. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.2175
Singh SP, Wang L, Gupta S, Goli H, Padmanabhan P, Gulyás B (2020) 3D deep learning on medical images: a review. Sensors 20(18):5097. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185097
Spasov S, Passamonti L, Duggento A, Liò P, Toschi N (2019) A parameter-efficient deep learning approach to predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage 189:276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.031
Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R (2014) Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Machine Learn Res 15(1):1929–1958
Suk HI, Lee SW, Shen D (2016) A. S. D. N. initiative. Deep sparse multi-task learning for feature selection in Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis. Brain Struct Funct 221(5):2569–2587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-015-1059-y
Suk H-I, Lee S-W, Shen D (2017) A S D N Initiative Deep ensemble learning of sparse regression models for brain disease diagnosis. Med Image Anal 37:101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2017.01.008
Sun X, Shi L, Luo Y, Yang W, Li H, Liang P, Li K, Mok VCT, Chu WCW, Wang D (2015) Histogram-based normalization technique on human brain magnetic resonance images from different acquisitions. Biomed Eng Online 14(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-015-0064-y
Sun W, Shao S, Zhao R, Yan R, Zhang X, Chen X (2016) A sparse auto-encoder-based deep neural network approach for induction motor faults classification. Measurement 89:171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.007
Sun C, Ma M, Zhao Z, Tian S, Yan R, Chen X (2018) Deep transfer Learning Based on sparse auto-encoder for remaining useful life prediction of tool in manufacturing. IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, 1–1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2018.2881543
Tanveer M, Richhariya B, Khan RU, Rashid AH, Khanna P, Prasad M, Lin CT (2020) Machine Learning techniques for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. ACM Trans Multimed Comput Commun Appl 16(1s):1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3344998
Tao S, Zhang T, Yang J, Wang X, Lu W (2015) Bearing fault diagnosis method based on stacked autoencoder and softmax regression. In: Control conference (CCC), 2015 34th Chinese. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ChiCC.2015.7260634
Theodore WH, Dorwart R, Holmes M, Porter RJ, DiChiro G (1986) Neuroimaging in refractory partial seizures: comparison of PET, CT, and MRI. Neurology 36(6):750–759. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.36.6.750
Trambaiolli LR, Lorena AC, Fraga FJ, Kanda PAM, Anghinah R, Nitrini R (2011) Improving Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis with machine Learning techniques. Clin EEG Neurosci 42(3):160–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/155005941104200304
Transfer learning and the art of using Pre-trained Models in Deep Learning. (2017) https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2017/06/transfer-learning-the-art-of-fine-tuning-a-pre-trained-model/
Vemuri P, Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, Shaw LM, Trojanowski JQ, Weiner MW, … Jack CR (2009) MRI and CSF biomarkers in normal, MCI, and AD subjects: predicting future clinical change. Neurology 73(4):294–301. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181af79fb
Venugopalan J, Tong L, Hassanzadeh HR, Wang MD (2021) Multimodal deep learning models for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease stage. Sci Rep 11(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74399-w
Vu TD, Yang HJ, Nguyen VQ et al (2017) Multimodal learning using convolution neural network and sparse autoencoder. BigComp 2017, Jeju, pp 309–312. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIGCOMP.2017.7881683
Wang F, Casalino LP, Khullar D (2018a) Deep Learning in medicine—promise, Progress, and challenges. JAMA Intern Med. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018
Wang Y, Yang Y, Guo X, Ye C, Gao N, Fang Y, Ma HT (2018b) A novel multimodal MRI analysis for Alzheimer’s disease Based on convolutional neural network. 2018 40th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/embc.2018.8512372
Wei J, Chu X, Sun XY, Xu K, Deng HX, Chen J, Wei Z, Lei M (2019) Machine learning in materials science. InfoMat 1(3):338–358. https://doi.org/10.1002/inf2.12028
Wen L, Gao L, Li X (2017) A new Deep transfer Learning Based on sparse auto-encoder for fault diagnosis. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics: systems, 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2017.2754287
Wu M, Chen L (2015) Image recognition based on deep learning. In 2015 Chinese automation congress (CAC) (pp. 542-546). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/cac.2015.7382560
Wu O, Winzeck S, Giese AK, Hancock BL, Etherton MR, Bouts MJ, … MRI-GENIE and GISCOME Investigators (2019) Big data approaches to phenotyping acute ischemic stroke using automated lesion segmentation of multi-center magnetic resonance imaging data. Stroke 50(7):1734–1741. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025373
Yamashita R, Nishio M, Do RKG, Togashi K (2018) Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology. Insights Imaging 9(4):611–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0639-9
Yanase J, Triantaphyllou E (2019) A systematic survey of computer-aided diagnosis in medicine: past and present developments. Expert Syst Appl 138:112821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112821
Yildirim M, Cinar A (2020a) Classification of Alzheimer’s disease MRI images with CNN Based hybrid method. Journal homepage: http://iieta.Org/journals/isi, 25(4), 413-418. https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.250402.
Yildirim M, Cinar A (2020b) Classification of Alzheimer's disease MRI images with CNN Based hybrid method. J homepage: http://iieta.Org/journals/isi, 25(4), 413-418. https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.250402
Yin W, Kann K, Yu M, Schütze H (2017) Comparative study of CNN and RNN for natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.01923
Young T, Hazarika D, Poria S, Cambria E (2018) Recent Trends in Deep Learning Based Natural Language Processing [Review Article]. IEEE Computational Intell Mag 13(3):55–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/mci.2018.2840738
Zhang L, Wang M, Liu M, Zhang D (2020a) A Survey on Deep Learning for Neuroimaging-Based Brain Disorder Analysis. Front Neurosci, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00779
Zhang Y, Zhang H, Adeli E, Chen X, Liu M, Shen D (2020b) Multiview feature Learning with multiatlas-Based functional connectivity networks for MCI diagnosis. IEEE Trans Cybernetics PP:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.3016953
Zhao X, Zhao X-M (2020) Deep learning of brain magnetic resonance images: a brief review. Methods 192:131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.09.007
Zotin A, Simonov K, Kapsargin F, Cherepanova T, Kruglyakov A, Cadena L (2018) Techniques for medical images processing using shearlet transform and color coding. In: Computer vision in control Systems-4. Springer, Cham, pp 223–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67994-5_9
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express appreciation to Hossam Magdy Balaha, who assisted in research work, and to Mansoura University for supporting the authors with the dataset collection.
Authors agreement
We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us.
Corresponding author
We understand that the declared corresponding author is the sole contact for the editorial process (including Editorial Manager and direct communications with the office). He/she is responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions of revisions, and final approval of proofs. We confirm that we have provided a current, correct email address that is accessible by the Corresponding Author.
Intellectual property
We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, concerning intellectual property. In so doing we confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests nor conflict of interests for the current study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Table of Abbreviations
Table of Abbreviations
Table 15 presents the used abbreviations in the current survey with the corresponding definitions. They are sorted in alphabetical order.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Arafa, D.A., Moustafa, H.ED., Ali-Eldin, A.M.T. et al. Early detection of Alzheimer’s disease based on the state-of-the-art deep learning approach: a comprehensive survey. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 23735–23776 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-11925-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-11925-0