Skip to main content
Log in

Blockchain for record-keeping and data verifying: proof of concept

  • 1219: Multimedia Security Based on Quantum Cryptography and Blockchain
  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper aims to show how blockchain, particularly Ethereum private blockchain, performs as a record keeper for Malaysian Muslim marriage records as a case study. The study also aims to demonstrate how blockchain technology conserves marriage data and improves data sharing efficiency involves accessing data from the blockchain and multiple users through proof of concept (POC). This POC also intended to seek evidence of immutability, transparency, and authenticity claims by the technology to ensure the record's security is a high priority. The study implements a smart contract on the Ethereum platform in the Government of Malaysia network environment and, the results provide significant evidence of private Ethereum blockchain principles of high availability, efficiency, immutability, transparency, and truthfulness particularly in record keeping. Future research can investigate other blockchain technology for other blockchain initiatives, such as blockchain disruptors. This paper is useful for management researchers and guides management practice for decision-making when determining whether the technology can use as a record-keeper. This paper proposes POC to design and develop record-keeping of Malaysian Muslim marriage records using Ethereum blockchain technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. (Federal Territories) Act 1984, Act 303 of 1984 in Malaysia; Enakmen Undang-Undang Keluarga (Negeri Selangor) 2003 [Islamic Family Law (State of Selangor) Enactment 2003], Enactment 2 of 2003.

References

  1. Abeyratne S, Monfared R (2016) Blockchain ready manufacturing supply chain using distributed ledger. Int J Res Eng Technol 5:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alghamdi TA et al (2020) Secure service provisioning scheme for lightweight IoT devices with a fair payment system and an incentive mechanism based on blockchain. IEEE Access 8:1048–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Androulaki E et al (2018) Hyperledger fabric: a distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. In Proc Thirteenth EuroSys Conf Porto Portugal ACM

  4. Aziz AA (2020) Ethereum private network and application development lab notes. Thuleen i.o

  5. Dorri A et al (2017) BlockChain: a distributed solution to automotive security and privacy. IEEE Commun Mag 55(12):119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Golosova J, Romanovs A (2018) The advantages and disadvantages of the blockchain technology. In 2018 IEEE 6th Workshop Adv Inf Electron Electr Eng (AIEEE). Lithuania:IEEE

  7. Guegan D (2017) Public blockchain versus private blockchain. Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne

  8. Ismail WAFW (2015) Forms of document falsification in Malaysia' s Syariah courts. Geografia Malays J Soc Space 11(9):32–39

  9. Islamic Family Law (Federal Territory) Act 1984 IFLA (1984) In Act 303, Government of Malaysia

  10. Kamaruzaman N et al (2018) Blockchain technology for islamic marriage certificate. Int J Eng Technol (UAE). 7(4):193–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kandaswamy R, Furlonger D (2018) Pay attention to these 4 types of blockchain business initiatives. Gartner

  12. Leising M (2020) MetaMask's blockchain mobile app opens doors for next-level web. Bloomberg

  13. Makhdoom I et al (2020) PrivySharing: a blockchain-based framework for privacy-preserving and secure data sharing in smart cities. Comput Secur 88:101653

  14. Metamask. https://metamask.io/. Accessed 15 May 2020

  15. Mohamad M (2017) Contesting syariah laws in malaysia: religion, human rights and the state’s response. J Polit Law 10(5):140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Review B (2018) Ethereum white paper made simple. pp 1-29. Report https://www.slideshare.net/antoniomanno3/ethereum-white-papermade-simple

  17. Salleh AZ et al (2016) Codification of islamic family law in Malaysia: the contending legal intricacies. Sci Int (Lahore) 28(2):1753–1762

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sicilia M, Visvizi A (2018) Blockchain and OECD data repositories: opportunities and policy making implications. Library Hi Tech 37. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-12-2017-0276/full/html

  19. Shuaib F (2012) The islamic legal system in Malaysia. Pac Rim L Policy J 21:90–91

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sun M, Zhang J (2020) Research on the application of block chain big data platform in the construction of new smart city for low carbon emission and green environment. Comput Commun 149:332–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tith D et al (2020) Application of blockchain to maintaining patient records in electronic health record for enhanced privacy, scalability, and availability. Healthcare Inf Res 26(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2020.26.1.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vazirani A et al (2020) Blockchain vehicles for efficient medical record management. NPJ Digit Med 3(1):1

  23. Viriyasitavat W, Hoonsopon D (2019) Blockchain characteristics and consensus in modern business processes. J Ind Inf Integr 13:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2018.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang S et al (2019) Blockchain-enabled smart contracts: architecture, applications, and future trends. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet Syst 49(11):2266–2277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang Y, Han JH, Beynon-Davies P (2018) Understanding blockchain technology for future supply chains: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Supply Chain Manag Int J 24(1):62–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2018-0148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wei J et al (2019) The adoption of blockchain technologies in data sharing: a state of the art survey. In WHICEB 2019 Proc Wuhan China AIS Electron Libr (AISeL)

  27. Zhao X et al (2017) The DAO attack paradoxes in propositional logic. In 2017 4th Int Conf Syst Inf (ICSAI). Hangzhou, China:IEEE

  28. Zhu Y et al (2019) A new instant confirmation mechanism based on interactive incontestable signature in consortium blockchain. Front Comput Sci 13:1182–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by the Malaysian Administrative Modernisation and Management Planning Unit (MAMPU), ICT Consulting Division, Prime Minister Department of Malaysia, and Industrial Research Grant, Integrasi Erat Sdn. Bhd, Vot. No: ZG-2021-001. High appreciation goes to the above sponsors. The authors gratefully acknowledge ICT Consulting Division blockchain team members for their sheer dedication to this POC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Nazir Ahmad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Abbreviation

Definition

POC

Proof Of Concept

JAKIM

Jabatan Kemajuan Islam

PAID

District Islamic Religious Office

JAIN

State Islamic Religious Department

SPPIM

Sistem Pengurusan Perkahwinan Islam Malaysia

IFLA

Islamic Family Law

RDMS

Relational Database Management System

SEMA

Simulated Existing Marriage Application

UAT

User Acceptance Test

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghazali, R., Ali, F.H.M., Bakar, H.A. et al. Blockchain for record-keeping and data verifying: proof of concept. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 36587–36605 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11336-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11336-7

Keywords

Navigation