Skip to main content
Log in

Retinal image quality assessment for diabetic retinopathy screening: A survey

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Retinal image quality assessment (RIQA) is one of the key components in screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR). As one of the most serious complications of diabetes, DR has become a leading cause of blindness in adults globally. DR screening is essential to achieve early diagnosis so that effective treatment could be provided timely. However, the collected images of medically unsatisfactory quality always lead to failure of diagnosis and waste of ophthalmologists’ precious time. Hence, the first step in a good DR screening program is verifying retinal images of good quality. In this paper, we provide a systematic review on automated assessment of retinal image quality for DR screening. Scheme and parameters for RIQA are firstly presented. Next, we provide detailed understanding of the existing RIQA techniques, algorithms and methodologies, including brief description and analysis of each existing state-of-art approaches and comparison between such methods. Datasets and evaluation metrics are also illustrated. Finally, several challenges and future research directions are summarized and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdel-Hamid L, El-Rafei A, El-Ramly S, Michelson G, Hornegger J (2016) Retinal image quality assessment based on image clarity and content. J Biomed Opt 21(9):096007

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abdel-Hamid L, El-Rafei A, Michelson G (2017) No-reference quality index for color retinal images. Comput Biol Med 90:68–75

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bartling H, Wanger P, Martin L (2009) Automated quality evaluation of digital fundus photographs. Acta Ophthalmol 87(6):643–647

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen F, Zeng X, Wang M (2015) Image denoising via local and nonlocal circulant similarity. J Vis Commun Image Rep 30:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cho N, Shaw J, Karuranga S, Huang Y, da Rocha Fernandes J, Ohlrogge A, Malanda B (2018) IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 138:271–281

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen A, Daubechies I, Vial P (1993) Wavelets on the interval and fast wavelet transforms. Appl Comput Harm Anal 1(1):54–81

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cummings E, Facey K, Macpherson K, Morris A, Reay L, Slattery J (2002) Health technology assessement report. Glasgow, Scotland

  8. Das T, Raman R, Ramasamy K (2015) Telemedicine in diabetic retinopathy: current status and future directions. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 22(2):174–178

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davis H, Russell S, Barriga E, Abramoff M, Soliz P (2009) Vision based, real-time retinal image quality assessment. IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, 1–6

  10. Decenciere E, Zhang X, Cazuguel G, Lay B, Cochener B, Trone C, Gain P, Ordonez R et al (2014) Feedback on a publicly distributed image database: the Messidor database. Image Anal Stereol 33(3):231–234

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Dias J, Oliveira CM, da Silva Cruz L (2014) Retinal image quality assessment using generic image quality indicators. Inform Fusion 19:73–90

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. P. R. C. Dept. of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences of the University of Wisconsin-Madison (1995) ARIC grading protocol. http://eyephoto.ophth.wisc.edu/ResearchAreas.html. Accessed: 30th June 2016

  13. Fleming AD, Philip S, Goatman KA, Olson JA, Sharp PF (2006) Automated assessment of diabetic retinal image quality based on clarity and field definition. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(3):1120–1125

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fleming AD, Philip S, Goatman KA, Sharp PF, Olson JA (2012) Automated clarity assessment of retinal images using regionally based structural and statistical measures. Med Eng Phys 34(7):849–859

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fundus disease Group in Ophthalmology Branch of Chinese Medical Association (2017) Guidelines of retinal image acquisition and reading for diabetic retinopathy screening in China. Chin J Ophthalmol 53(12):890–896

    Google Scholar 

  16. Giancardo L, Abramoff MD, Chaum E, Karnowski T, Meriaudeau F, Tobin K (2008) Elliptical local vessel density: a fast and robust quality metric for retinal images. IEEE 30th Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS): 3534–3537

  17. Giancardo L, Meriaudeau F, Karnowski TP, Li Y, Garg S, Tobin KW Jr, Chaum E (2012) Exudate-based diabetic macular edema detection in fundus images using publicly available datasets. Med Image Anal 16(1):216–226

    Google Scholar 

  18. Haralick RM, Shanmugan K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 6:610–621

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hoover A, Kouznetsova V, Goldbaum M (2000) Locating blood vessels in retinal images by piecewise threshold probing of a matched filter response. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 19(3):203–210

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hunter A, Lowell JA, Habib M, Ryder B, Basu A, Steel D (2011) An automated retinal image quality grading algorithm. IEEE Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS): 5955–5958

  21. Hwang SK, Kim WY (2006) A novel approach to the fast computation of zernike moments. Pattern Recogn 39(11):2065–2076

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Katuwal GJ, Kerekes J, Ramchandran R, Sisson C, Rao N (2013) Automatic fundus image field detection and quality assessment. IEEE Western New York Image Processing Workshop (WNYIPW), 9–13.

  23. Kawaguchi A, Sharafeldin N, Sundaram A, Campbell S, Tennant M, Rudnisky C (2018) Tele-Ophthalmology for Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Telemedicine and e-Health 24(4):301–308

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lalonde M, Gagnon L, Boucher MC et al (2001) Automatic visual quality assessment in optical fundus images. Proceedings of vision interface, Ottawa 32:259–264

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lee SC, Wang Y (1999) Automatic retinal image quality assessment and enhancement. Proc Int Soc Opt Photo 3661:1581–1590

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li B, Li HK (2013) Automated analysis of diabetic retinopathy images: principles, recent developments, and emerging trends. Curr Diab Rep 13(4):453–459

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li JJ, Zhang L, Peng XY (2014) Some issues of diagnosis based on ocular fundus image reading in teleophthalmology. Ophthalmol Chin 23(4):217–220

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li Y, Ren W, Zhu T, Ren Y, Qin Y, Jie W (2018) RIMS: A Real-time and Intelligent Monitoring System for live-broadcasting platforms. Futur Gener Comput Syst 87:259–266

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lin KY, Wang G (2018) Hallucinated-IQA: No-reference image quality assessment via adversarial learning. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 732-741

  30. MESSIDOR (2004) Methods for Evaluating Segmentation and Indexing technique Dedicated to Retinal Ophthalmology. http://www.adcis.net/en/download-Third-Party/Messidor.html. Accessed: 25 Nov. 2018

  31. Mora AD, Soares J, Fonseca JM (2014) A template matching technique for artifacts detection in retinal images. International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis (ISPA), 717-722

  32. Morse SS (2013) Public health disease surveillance networks. Microbiol Spectrum 2(1):OH-0002-2012

    Google Scholar 

  33. Narvekar ND, Karam LJ (2011) A no-reference image blur metric based on the cumulative probability of blur detection (CPBD). IEEE Trans Image Process 20(9):2678–2683

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Nayak J, Acharya R, Bhat PS, Shetty N, Lim TC (2009) Automated diagnosis of glaucoma using digital fundus images. J Med Syst 33(5):337

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nayar SK, Nakagawa Y (1989) Shape from focus. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 16(8):824–831

    Google Scholar 

  36. Niemeijer M, Staal J, Ginneken B, Loog M, Abramoff M (2004) Drive: digital retinal images for vessel extraction. Methods for Evaluating Segmentation and Indexing Techniques Dedicated to Retinal Ophthalmology. http://www.isi.uu.nl/Research/Databases/DRIVE/. Accessed: 13 Oct. 2017

  37. Niemeijer M, Abramoff MD, Ginneken B (2006) Image structure clustering for image quality verification of color retina images in diabetic retinopathy screening. Med Image Anal 10(6):888–898

    Google Scholar 

  38. Niemeijer M, Van Ginneken B, Cree MJ, Mizutani A, Quellec G, Zhang B, Hornero R et al (2010) Retinopathy online challenge: automatic detection of microaneurysms in digital color fundus photographs. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29(1):185–195

    Google Scholar 

  39. Niu Y, Lin W, Ke X, Ke L (2017) Fitting-based optimization for image visual salient object detection. IET Comput Vis 11(2):161–172

    Google Scholar 

  40. Niu Y, Lin L, Chen Y, Ke L (2017) Machine learning-based framework for saliency detection in distorted images. Multimed Tools Appl 76(24):26329–26353

    Google Scholar 

  41. Paulus J, Meier J, Bock R, Hornegger J, Michelson G (2010) Automated quality assessment of retinal fundus photos. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5(6):557–564

    Google Scholar 

  42. Perez J, Espinosa J, Vazquez C, Mas D (2013) Retinal image quality assessment through a visual similarity index. J Mod Opt 60(7):544–550

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pires R, Jelinek HF, Wainer J, Rocha A (2012) Retinal image quality analysis for automatic diabetic retinopathy detection. IEEE 25th Conf Graph Patterns Images (SIBGRAPI): 229–236

  44. Pratt H, Coenen F, Broadbent DM, Harding SP, Zheng Y (2016) Convolutional neural networks for diabetic retinopathy. Proc Comput Sci 90:200–205

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sevik U, Kose C, Berber T, Erdol H (2014) Identification of suitable fundus images using automated quality assessment methods. J Biomed Opt 19(4):046006

    Google Scholar 

  46. Shao F, Yang Y, Jiang Q, Jiang G, Ho YS (2018) Automated quality assessment of fundus images via analysis of illumination, naturalness and structure. IEEE Access 6:806–817

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sim DA, Keane PA, Tufail A, Egan CA, Aiello LP, Silva PS (2015) Automated retinal image analysis for diabetic retinopathy in telemedicine. Curr Diab Rep 15(3):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sopharak A, Uyyanonvara B, Barman S (2011) Automatic microaneurysm detection from non-dilated diabetic retinopathy retinal images using mathematical morphology methods. IAENG Int J Comput Sci 38(3):295–301

    Google Scholar 

  49. Soto-Pedre E, Navea A, Millan S, Hernaez-Ortega MC, Morales J, Desco MC, P’erez P (2015) Evaluation of automated image analysis software for the detection of diabetic retinopathy to reduce the ophthalmologists’ workload. Acta Ophthalmol 93(1):e52–e56

    Google Scholar 

  50. Usher D, Himaga M, Dumskyj M, Boyce J (2003) Automated assessment of digital fundus image quality using detected vessel area. Proceedings of Medical Image Understanding and Analysis: 81–84

  51. Wang S, Guo W (2017) Sparse multi-graph embedding for multimodal feature representation. IEEE Trans Multimedia 19(7):1454–1466

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):600–612

    Google Scholar 

  53. Welikala R, Fraz M, Foster P, Whincup P, Rudnicka AR, Owen GG, Strachan D et al (2016) Automated retinal image quality assessment on the uk biobank dataset for epidemiological studies. Comput Biol Med 71:67–76

    Google Scholar 

  54. Xia Y, Leung H, Kamel MS (2016) A discrete-time learning algorithm for image restoration using a novel l2-norm noise constrained estimation. Neurocomputing 198:155–170

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yao Z, Zhang Z, Xu LQ, Fan Q, Xu L (2016) Generic features for fundus image quality evaluation. IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom), 1–6

  56. Yin F, Wong DWK, Yow AP, Lee BH, Quan Y, Zhang Z, Gopalakrishnan K, Li R, Liu J (2014) Automatic retinal interest evaluation system (ARIES). IEEE 36th Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 162–165.

  57. Yu H, Agurto C, Barriga S, Nemeth SC, Soliz P, Zamora G (2012) Automated image quality evaluation of retinal fundus photographs in diabetic retinopathy screening. IEEE southwest symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation (SSIAI), 125-128

  58. Yu F, Sun J, Li A, Cheng J, Wan C, Liu J (2017) Image quality classification for dr screening using deep learning. IEEE 39th Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 664–667

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41801324), by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (No.2016 J0129), by the Educational Commission of Fujian Province of China (No.JAT160070).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiawen Lin.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, J., Yu, L., Weng, Q. et al. Retinal image quality assessment for diabetic retinopathy screening: A survey. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 16173–16199 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-07751-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-07751-6

Keywords

Navigation