Skip to main content
Log in

Plant identification via multipath sparse coding

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel plant identification method based on multipath sparse coding using SIFT features, which avoids the need of feature engineering and the reliance on botanical taxonomy. In particular, the proposed method uses five paths to model the shape and texture features of plant images, and at each path it learns the dictionaries with different sizes using hierarchical sparse coding. Finally, we apply the learned representation for plant identification using linear SVM for classification. We evaluate the proposed method on several plant datasets and find that multi-organ is more informative than single organ for botanist. Experimental results also validate that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. can be downloaded from http://www.vlfeat.org

References

  1. Belhumeur P, Chen D, Feiner S, Jacobs D, Kress W, Ling H, Lopez I, Ramamoorthi R, Sheorey S, White S, Zhang L (2008) Searching the world’s herbaria: a system for visual identification of plant species. In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), p 116–129

  2. Bo L, Ren X, Fox D (2013) Multipath sparse coding using hierarchical matching pursuit. In: CVPR

  3. Boureau Y, Bach F, LeCun Y, Ponce J (2010) Learning mid-level features for recognition. In: CVPR

  4. Caballero C, Aranda MC (2010) Plant species identification using leaf image retrieval. In: ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval (CIVR), p 327–334

  5. Du JX, Wang XF, Hang GJ (2007) Leaf shape based plant species recognition. Appl Math Comput 185(2):883–893

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fiel S, Sablatnig R (2011) Automated identification of tree species from images of the bark, leaves and needles. 16th Computer Vision Winter Workshop, Austria

  7. Goëau H, Bonnet P, Barbe J, Bakic V, Joly A, Molino J-F (2012) Multi-organ plant identification. In: the Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Multimedia analysis for ecological data. p 41–44

  8. Goëau H, Bonnet P, Joly A (2015) LifeCLEF plant identification task

  9. Guru DS, Sharath YH, Manjunath S (2010) Texture features and KNN in classification of flower images. IJCA Special Issue on Recent Trends in Image Processing and Pattern Recognition

  10. Han J, Sun L, Hu X, Han J, Shao L (2014) Spatial and temporal visual attention prediction in videos using eye movement data. Neurocomputing 145:140–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Han J, Wang D, Shao L, Qian X, Cheng G, Han J (2014) Image visual attention computation and application via the learning of object attributes. Mach Vis Appl 25(7):1671–1683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsiao JK, Kang LW, Chang CL, Lin CY (2014) Learning sparse representation for leaf image recognition. In: ICCE

  13. Hsiao JK, Kang LW, Chang CL, Lin CY (2014) Comparative study of leaf image recognition with a novel learning-based approach. Science and Information Conference. London, p 389–393

  14. Kim S-J, Kim B-W, Kim D-P (2011) Tree recognition for landscape using by combination of features of its leaf, flower and bark. SICE Annual Conference. Tokyo, p 1147–1151

  15. Kulkarni T, Uke NJ (2014) Implementation of image based flower classification system. Int J Comput Sci Bus Inform (IJCSBI) 13(1):35–44

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar N, Belhumeur PN, Biswas A, Jacobs DW, Kress WJ, Lopez IC, Soares JVB (2012) Leafsnap: a computer vision system for automatic plant species identification. ECCV, p 502–516

  17. Lazebnik S, Schmid C, Ponce J (2006) Beyond bags of features: spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In: CVPR

  18. Lee K-B, Hong K-S (2013) An implementation of leaf recognition system using leaf vein and shape. Int J Bio-Sci Bio-Technol 5:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis (IJCV) 60(2):91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mabrouk AB, Najjar A, Zagrouba E (2014) Image flower recognition based on a new method for color feature extraction. International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Application (VISAPP), p 201-206

  21. Metre V, Ghorpade J (2013) An overview of the research on texture based plant leaf classification. IJCSN Int J Comput Sci Netw 2(3)

  22. Mouine S, Yahiaoui I, Erroust-Blondet A, Joyeux L, Selmi S, Goëau H (2013) An android application for leaf-based plant identification. Proc. ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia Retrieval

  23. Mouine S, Yahiaoui I, Verroust-Blondet A (2013) Advanced shape context for plant species identification using leaf image retrieval. In: Proceedings of the second ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. ACM, p 49

  24. Nilsback M-E, Zisserman A. Automated flower classification over a large number of classes. In: Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, p 722–729

  25. Pallavi P, Veena Devi VS (2014) Leaf recognition based on feature extraction and zernike moments. International Conference On Advances in Computer & Communication Engineering (ACCE), p 67–73

  26. Patel HN, Dr. Jain RK, Dr. Joshi MV (2011) Fruit detection using improved multiple features based algorithm. Int J Comput Appl 13(2)

  27. Peng P, Shao L, Han J, Han J (2015) Saliency-aware image-to-class distances for image classification. Neurocomputing 166:337–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Song Y, Glasbey CA, Horgan GW, Polder G, Dieleman JA, Van der Heijden GWAM (2014) Automatic fruit recognition and counting from multiple images. Biosyst Eng 118:203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Spams toolbox. http://spams-devel.gforge.inria.fr/

  30. Tang J, Shao L, Li X (2014) Efficient dictionary learning for visual categorization. Comput Vis Image Underst 124:91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang Z, Chi Z, Feng D (2003) Shape based leaf image retrieval. IEE Proc Vis Image Signal Process 150(1):34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang X, Huang D, Dua J, Xu H, Heutte L (2008) Classification of plant leaf images with complicated background. Appl Math Comput 205:916–926

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Z, Lu B, Chi Z, Feng D (2011) Leaf image classification with shape context and SIFT descriptors. In: Digital image computing: techniques and applications (DICTA), p 650–654

  34. Wang J, Yang J, Yu K, Lv F, Huang T, Guo Y (2010) Locality-constrained linear coding for image classification. In: CVPR

  35. Wilf P, Zhang S, Chikkerur S, Little S, Wing S, Serre T (2016) Computer vision cracks the leaf code. PNAS, 113(12): 3305-3310

  36. Xiao XY, Hu R, Zhang SW, Wang XF (2010) HOG based approach for leaf classification, vol. 6216 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, book section 19. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, p 149–155

  37. Yang J, Yu K, Gong Y, Huang T (2009) Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification. In: CVPR

  38. Yu K, Lin Y, Lafferty J (2011) Learning image representations from the pixel level via hierarchical sparse coding. In: CVPR

  39. Zhang B, Ji S, Li L, Zhang S, Yang W. Sparsity analysis versus sparse representation classifier. Neuro Comput, accepted. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.06.052

  40. Zhang B, Perina A, Murino V, Del Bue A (2015) Sparse representation classification with manifold constraints transfer. CVPR, p 4557–4565

  41. Zhang S, Yao H, Sun X, Lu X (2013) Sparse coding based visual tracking: Review and experimental comparison. Pattern Recogn 46(7):1772–1788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang S, Zhou H, Jiang F, Li X (2015) Robust visual tracking using structurally random projection and weighted least squares. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 25(11):1749–1760

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported in part by the national key R&D program of China (2015BAH52F03), the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61300111), Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation (NO.2014CFB659) and selfdetermined research funds of CCNU from the colleges’ basic research and operation of MOE (No.CCNU15A05023).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinyuan Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, H., Huang, X., Zhang, S. et al. Plant identification via multipath sparse coding. Multimed Tools Appl 76, 4599–4615 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3538-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3538-4

Keywords

Navigation