Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Combining cellular automata and local binary patterns for copy-move forgery detection

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detection of duplicated regions in digital images has been a highly investigated field in recent years since the editing of digital images has been notably simplified by the development of advanced image processing tools. In this paper, we present a new method that combines Cellular Automata (CA) and Local Binary Patterns (LBP) to extract feature vectors for the purpose of detection of duplicated regions. The combination of CA and LBP allows a simple and reduced description of texture in the form of CA rules that represents local changes in pixel luminance values. The importance of CA lies in the fact that a very simple set of rules can be used to describe complex textures, while LBP, applied locally, allows efficient binary representation. CA rules are formed on a circular neighborhood, resulting in insensitivity to rotation of duplicated regions. Additionally, a new search method is applied to select the nearest neighbors and determine duplicated blocks. In comparison with similar methods, the proposed method showed good performance in the case of plain/multiple copy-move forgeries and rotation/scaling of duplicated regions, as well as robustness to post-processing methods such as blurring, addition of noise and JPEG compression. An important advantage of the proposed method is its low computational complexity and simplicity of its feature vector representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amerini I, Ballan L, Caldelli R, Del Bimbo A, Giuseppe S (2011) A SIFT-based forensic method for copy-move attack detection and transformation recovery. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 6(3):1099–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bashar M, Noda K, Ohnishi N, Mori K (2010) Exploring duplicated regions in natural images. IEEE Trans Image Process. Accepted for publication

  3. Bayram S, Sencar H, Memon N (2009) An efficient and robust method for detecting copy-move forgery. IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signals Process: 1053–1056

  4. Bhatnagar G, Wu QMJ, Raman B (2011) A new aspect in robust digital watermarking. Multimedia Tools Appl 66(2):179–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bo X, Junwen W, Guangjie L, Yuewei D (2010) Image copy-move forgery detection based on SURF. Multimedia Inf Netw Secur: 889–892

  6. Bravo-Solorio S, Nandi AK (2011) Exposing duplicated regions affected by reflection, rotation and scaling. Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process: 1880–1883

  7. Christlein V, Riess C, Jordan J, Riess C, Angelopoulou E (2012) An evaluation of popular copy-move forgery detection approaches. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 7(6):1841–1854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Farid H (2009) Image forgery detection: a survey. IEEE Signal Process Mag 26(2):16–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fridrich J, Soukal D, Lukas J (2003) Detection of copy move forgery in digital images. Proc. Digital Forensic Research Workshop

  10. Hou X, Zhang T, Xiong G, Zhang Y, Ping X (2014) Image resampling detection based on texture classification. Multimedia Tools Appl 72(2):1681–1708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li L, Li S, Zhu H, Chu S, Roddick J, Pan J (2013) An efficient scheme for detecting copy-move forged images by local binary patterns. J Inf Hiding Multimedia Signal Process 4(1):46–56

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lin H, Wang C, Kao Y (2009) Fast copy-move forgery detection. WSEAS Trans Signal Process 5(5):188–197

    Google Scholar 

  13. Luo W, Huang J, Qiu G (2006) Robust detection of region-duplication forgery in digital images. IEEE Inf Forensics Secur 4:746–749

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muja, M, Lowe, DG (2012) Fast matching of binary features. Comput Robot Vision (CRV), pp 404–410

  15. Ojala T, Pietikainen M, Maeenpaa T (2002) Multiresolution gray- scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 24(7):971–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Popescu A, Farid H (2004) Exposing digital forgeries by detecting duplicated image regions, tech. rep. tr2004-515. Dartmouth College

  17. Redi JA, Taktak W, Dugelay J-L (2011) Digital image forensics: a booklet for beginners. Multimedia Tools Appl 51(1):133–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosin PL (2007) Training cellular automata for image processing. IEEE Trans Image Process 15(7):2076–2087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ryu S, Lee M, Lee H (2010) Detection of copy-rotate-move forgery using Zernike moments. Inf Hiding Conf: 51–65

  20. Shivakumar BL, Baboo S (2011) Detection of region duplication forgery in digital images using SURF. Int J Comput Sci Issues 8(4):199–205

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sun X, Rosin PL, Martin RR (2011) Fast rule identification and neighborhood selection for cellular automata. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 41(3):749–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Swaminathan A, Min W, Liu K (2013) Copy-move forgery detection using multiresolution local binary patterns. Forensic Sci Int 231(1–3):61–72

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tralic D, Rosin PL, Sun X, Grgic S (2014) Detection of duplicated image regions using cellular automata. Proceed Int Conf Syst Signals Image Process: 167–170

  24. Tralic D, Rosin PL, Sun X, Grgic S (2014) Copy-move forgery detection using cellular automata. In: Rosin P L, Adamatzky A, Sun X (eds) Cellular Automata in Image Processing and Geometry. Springer, pp 105 – 125

  25. Tralic D, Zupancic I, Grgic S, Grgic M (2013) CoMoFoD - new database for copy-move forgery detection. In: Proc. 55th International Symposium ELMAR-2013. pp 49–54

  26. Wang J, Liu G, Zhang Z, Dai Y, Wang Z (2009) Fast and robust forensics for image region-duplication forgery. Acta Autom Sin 35(12):1488–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Unska 3/XII, HR-10000, Zagreb, Croatia

    Dijana Tralic & Sonja Grgic

  2. School of Computer Science and Informatics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK

    Xianfang Sun & Paul L. Rosin

Authors
  1. Dijana Tralic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sonja Grgic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xianfang Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paul L. Rosin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dijana Tralic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tralic, D., Grgic, S., Sun, X. et al. Combining cellular automata and local binary patterns for copy-move forgery detection. Multimed Tools Appl 75, 16881–16903 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2961-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2961-2

Keywords