Abstract
One of the most crucial steps for preventing viral pandemics is the early detection of the causative virus on site. Various molecular and immunological approaches have been developed for virus detection. In this study, we investigated the utility of the recently introduced convection polymerase chain reaction (cPCR) platform for the rapid and sensitive detection of various animal viruses in the field, including the foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) and avian influenza viruses (AIVs). Primer sets were designed to simultaneously detect two highly conserved regions of the FMDV, including the 5′ untranslated region (5′-UTR) and 3D gene, and to specifically amplify the NP and hemagglutinin (HA) genes of H5 and H9 subtypes of AIVs. The portable cPCR system was able to amplify from as low as 1 to 10 copies of viral cDNAs in the singleplex mode and 10 to 100 copies of viral cDNAs in the duplex mode within 21 min. Thus, our data suggest that the cPCR protocols developed in this study are highly sensitive and enable quick detection of animal viruses in biological samples.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Callahan JD, Brown F, Osorio FA, Sur JH, Kramer E, Long GW, Lubroth J, Ellis SJ, Shoulars KS, Gaffney KL, Rock DL, Nelson WM (2002) Use of a portable real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus. J Am Vet Med Assoc 220:1636–1642
Rasmussen TB, Uttenthal A, de Stricker K, Belak S, Storgaard T (2003) Development of a novel quantitative real-time RT-PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of all serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Arch Virol 148:2005–2021
Rouse BT, Lukacher AE (2010) Some unmet challenges in the immunology of viral infections. Discov Med 10:363–370
Rodriguez A, Nunez JI, Nolasco G, Ponz F, Sobrino F, De Blas C (1994) Direct PCR detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus. J Virol Methods 47(3):345–349
Marquardt O, Straub OC, Ahl R, Hass B (1995) Detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus in nasal swabs of asymptomatic cattle by RT-PCR within 24 hours. J Virol Methods 53:255–261
Callens M, De Clercq K (1997) Differentiation of the seven serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. J Virol Methods 67:35–44
Sakurai A, Shibasaki F (2012) Updated values for molecular diagnosis for highly pathogenic avian influenza virus. Viruses 4:1235–1257
Shojaei TR, Tabatabaei M, Shawky S, Salleh MA, Bald D (2015) A review on emerging diagnostic assay for viral detection: the case of avian influenza virus. Mol Biol Rep 42:187–199
Cane PA, Pringle CR (1995) Molecular epidemiology of respiratory syncytial virus: a review of the use of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in the analysis of genetic variability. Electrophoresis 16:329–333
Hwang HJ, Kim JH, Jeong K (2009) Method and apparatus for amplification of. nucleic acid sequences by using thermal convection. US Patent 7,628,961 B2, 2009
Hwang HJ (2011) Three-stage thermal convection apparatus and uses thereof, International Patent Application Publication No. WO 2011/086497 A2, 2011
Song KY, Hwang HJ, Kim JH (2017) Ultra-fast DNA-based multiplex convection PCR method for meat species identification with possible on-site applications. Food Chem 229:341–346
Alexandersen S, Zhang Z, Donaldson AI, Garland AJ (2003) The pathogenesis and diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease. J Comp Pathol 129:1–36
Park JH, Lee KN, Ko YJ, Kim SM, Lee HS, Park JY, Yeh JY, Kim MJ, Lee YH, Sohn HJ, Cho IS, Kim B (2013) Diagnosis and control measures of the 2010 outbreak of foot-and mouth disease A type in the Republic of Korea. Transbound Emerg Dis 60:188–192
Le VP, Lee KN, Nguyen T, Kim SM, Cho IS, Quyen DV, Khang DD, Park JH (2011) Development of one-step multiplex RT-PCR method for simultaneous detection and differentiation of foot-and mouth disease virus serotypes O, A, and Asia 1 circulating in Vietnam. J Virol Methods 175:101–108
Stallknecht DE, Shane SM (1988) Host range of avian influenza virus in free-living birds. Vet Res Commun 12:125–141
Mo IP, Bae YJ, Lee SB, Mo JS, Oh KH, Shin JH, Kang HM, Lee YJ (2016) Review of avian influenza outbreaks in South Korea from 1996 to 2014. Avian Dis 60:172–177
Chatziprodromidou IP, Arvanitidou M, Guitian J, Apostolou T, Vantarakis G, Vantarakis A (2018) Global avian influenza outbreaks 2010-2016: a systematic review of their distribution, avian species and virus subtype. Syst Rev 7:17
Pasick J (2008) Advances in the molecular based techniques for the diagnosis and characterization of avian influenza virus infections. Transbound Emerg Dis 55:329–338
Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettgan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948
King DP, Ferris NP, Shaw AE, Reid SM, Hutchings GH, Giuffre AC, Robida JM, Callahan JD, Nelson WM, Beckham TR (2006) Detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus: comparative diagnostic sensitivity of two independent real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assays. J Vet Diagn Invest 18:93–97
Wang R, Taubenberger JK (2010) Methods for molecular surveillance of influenza. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 8:517–527
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Research and Business Development Program of the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (Grant N0001697) and Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (Grant 10080151) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy, Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, M.H., Song, KY., Hwang, H.J. et al. Development of fast and sensitive protocols for the detection of viral pathogens using a small portable convection PCR platform. Mol Biol Rep 46, 5073–5077 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-019-04961-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-019-04961-x