Abstract
In Chlamydomonas growing under 24 h light–dark cycles, chloroplast transcription is under circadian clock control, and peaks early in the morning. The peak (but not trough) requires ongoing cytoplasmic translation, as it is sensitive to cycloheximide (CH). The chloroplast transcriptional apparatus in Chlamydomonas is simpler than in land plants, with only one type of RNA polymerase (RNAP, bacterial) and apparently only one sigma factor (RPOD). Core RNAP can be assayed in vitro with a non-sigma factor dependent template, and is sensitive to rifampicin. We developed a membrane-based assay for RNAP activity, and used it to determine that core activity is only weakly affected by pre-treating cells with CH. Moreover, core chloroplast RNAP activity was steady during a 24 h light–dark cycle. Levels of the sigma factor (RPOD) were examined using western blots, and found to fluctuate less than 25 % during light–dark cycles. These data indicate that circadian regulation of chloroplast transcription is distinct from regulation by sulfur availability, which involves significant changes in RPOD levels. The implications of this data for hypotheses that purport to explain the circadian control mechanism are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hwang S, Kawazoe R, Herrin DL (1996) Transcription of tufA and other chloroplast-encoded genes is controlled by a circadian clock in Chlamydomonas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:996–1000
Salvador ML, Klein U, Bogorad L (2003) Light-regulated and endogenous fluctuations of chloroplast transcript levels in Chlamydomonas: regulation by transcription and RNA degradation. Plant J 3:213–219
Kawazoe R, Hwang S, Herrin DL (2000) Requirement for cytoplasmic protein synthesis during circadian peaks of transcription of chloroplast-encoded genes in Chlamydomonas. Plant Mol Biol 44:699–709
Matsuo T, Onai K, Okamoto K, Minagawa J, Ishiura M (2006) Real-time monitoring of chloroplast gene expression by a luciferase reporter: evidence for nuclear regulation of chloroplast circadian period. Mol Cell Biol 26:863–870
Matsuo T, Ishiura M (2011) Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as a new model system for studying the molecular basis of the circadian clock. FEBS Lett 585:1495–1502
Allison LA, Simon LD, Maliga P (1996) Deletion of rpoB reveals a second distinct transcription system in plastids of higher plants. EMBO J 15:2802–2809
Hedtke B, Börner T, Weihe A (1997) Mitochondrial and chloroplast phage-type RNA polymerases in Arabidopsis. Science 277:809–811
Hess WR, Borner T (1999) Organellar RNA polymerase of higher plants. Int Rev Cytol 190:1–59
Smith AC, Purton S (2002) The transcriptional apparatus of algal plastids. Eur J Phycol 37:301–311
Surzycki SJ (1969) Genetic functions of the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardii: effect of rifampin on chloroplast DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 63:1327–1334
Guertin M, Bellemare G (1979) Synthesis of chloroplast ribonucleic acid in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii toluene-treated cells. Eur J Biochem 96:125–129
Fong SE, Surzycki S (1992) Chloroplast RNA polymerase genes of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii exhibit an unusual structure and arrangement. Curr Genet 21:485–497
Doi RH, Wang LF (1986) Multiple procaryotic ribonucleic acid polymerase sigma factors. Microbiol Rev 50:227–243
Schweer J (2010) Plant sigma factors come of age: flexible transcription factor network for regulated plastid gene expression. Endocytobiosis Cell Res 20:1–12
Helmann JD, Chamberlin MJ (1988) Structure and function of bacterial sigma factors. Annu Rev Biochem 57:839–872
Liu B, Troxler RF (1996) Molecular characterization of a positively photoregulated nuclear gene for a chloroplast RNA polymerase sigma factor in Cyanidium caldarium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:3313–3318
Carter ML, Smith AC, Kobayashi H, Purton S, Herrin DL (2004) Structure, circadian regulation, and bioinformatic analysis of the unique sigma factor gene in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Photosynth Res 82:339–349
Bohne A-V, Irihimovitch V, Weihe A, Stern DB (2006) Chlamydomonas reinhardtii encodes a single sigma70-like factor which likely functions in chloroplast transcription. Curr Genet 49:333–340
Irihimovitch V, Stern DB (2006) The sulfur acclimation SAC3 kinase is required for chloroplast transcriptional repression under sulfur limitation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:7911–7916
Maul JE, Lilly JW, Cui L, dePamphilis CW, Miller W, Harris EH, Stern DB (2002) The Chlamydomonas reinhardtii plastid chromosome: islands of genes in a sea of repeats. Plant Cell 14:2659–2679
Troxler RF, Zhang F, Hu J, Bogorad L (1994) Evidence that sigma factors are components of chloroplast RNA polymerase. Plant Physiol 104:753–759
Vogt V (1969) Breaks in DNA stimulate transcription by core RNA polymerase. Nature 223:854–855
Herrin DL, Battey JF, Greer K, Schmidt GW (1992) Regulation of chlorophyll apoprotein expression and accumulation: requirements for carotenoids and chlorophyll. J Biol Chem 267:8260–8269
Harris E (1989) The Chlamydomonas sourcebook. Academic Press, San Diego
Hwang S, Herrin DL (1994) Control of lhc gene transcription by the circadian clock in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Mol Biol 26:557–569
Hallick RB, Lipper C, Richards OC, Rutter WJ (1976) Isolation of a transcriptionally active chromosome from chloroplasts of Euglena gracilis. Biochemistry 15:3039–3045
Lizardi PM, Binder R, Short SA (1984) Preparative isolation of DNA and biologically active mRNA from diethylaminoethyl membrane. Gene Anal Tech 1:33–39
Baginsky S, Tiller K, Link G (1997) Transcription factor phosphorylation by a protein kinase associated with chloroplast RNA polymerase from mustard (Sinapis alba). Plant Mol Biol 34:181–189
Arigoni F, Duncan L, Alper S, Losick R, Stragier P (1996) SpoIIE governs the phosphorylation state of a protein regulating transcription factor sigma F during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:3238–3242
Pratt LA, Silhavy TJ (1996) The response regulator SprE controls the stability of RpoS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:2488–2492
Helmann JD (1999) Anti-sigma factors. Curr Opin Microbiol 2:135–141
Salvador ML, Klein U, Bogorad L (1998) Endogenous fluctuations of DNA topology in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Mol Cell Biol 18:7235–7242
Peter BJ, Arsuaga J, Breier AM, Khodursky AB, Brown PO, Cozzarelli N (2004) Genomic transcriptional response to loss of chromosomal supercoiling in Escherichia coli. Genome Biol 5:R87
Thompson RJ, Mosig G (1985) An ATP-dependent supercoiling topoisomerase of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii affects accumulation of specific chloroplast transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res 13:873–891
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by grants from the Texas Advanced Research Program (003658-0144-2007) and the Robert A. Welch Foundation (F-1164) to DLH, and by an Undergraduate Research Fellowship to BV.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Fig. S1
Determining the response and capacity of the DEAE-membrane for the core RNAP reaction. a The core RNAP assay used 32P-UTP (to estimate RNA synthesis) and a highly active RNAP extract (PEG-prec) under standard conditions, except for increasing the reaction vol by 500 l. The terminated reactions were aliquoted (as indicated) into separate tubes, adjusted to 400 l with 1× stop solution (0.5 M NaH2PO4 pH 7.2, 50 mM EDTA) and applied to the DEAE-membrane. Each horizontal row of dots is from the same reaction mixture, and a set of unincubated (U) reactions (100 μl) were included to estimate background. b Plot of the membrane-bound signal versus the reaction mixture vol (per well). The data points are averages of the three separate reactions, which did not vary more than 7%. They were normalized relative to the 200-μl reaction, which was considered to be 100%. (DOC 25 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kawazoe, R., Mahan, K.M., Venghaus, B.E. et al. Circadian regulation of chloroplast transcription in Chlamydomonas is accompanied by little or no fluctuation in RPOD levels or core RNAP activity. Mol Biol Rep 39, 10565–10571 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-012-1942-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-012-1942-z