Skip to main content
Log in

Systematic analysis of gene expression level with tissue-specificity, function and protein subcellular localization in human transcriptome

  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that, in mammals, the highly expressed genes have shorter gene length and their protein products have relatively lower evolutionary rates. However, the global relationship between genes’ expression level and their features such as tissue-specificity, function and protein subcellular localization has not been investigated extensively, especially in mammalian. In order to solve it, we analysed 8,570 genes across 46 human tissues. Our results suggest that widely expressed genes have higher mean expression levels than tissue-specific ones and genes encoding zinc-finger proteins have low expression levels similar to that of DNA-binding proteins. In the analysis of protein subcellular localization, it is shown that nuclear and Golgi apparatus proteins have lower mean expression levels than those of mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum and membrane proteins, while genes encoding cytoplasm and extracellular components display the highest expression levels. When comparing the gene expression levels and the number of expressed genes in different tissues, we found that some tissues have less active genes while single gene encodes relatively more transcripts. Taken together, gene expression levels are clearly correlated with their tissue-specificity, function and protein subcellular localization, and are highly conserved during evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nie H, Crooijmans RP, Lammers A, van Schothorst EM, Keijer J, Neerincx PB, Leunissen JA, Megens HJ, Groenen MA (2010) Gene expression in chicken reveals correlation with structural genomic features and conserved patterns of transcription in the terrestrial vertebrates. PLoS One 5(8):e11990

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Ferrari L, Aitken S (2006) Mining housekeeping genes with a Naive Bayes classifier. BMC Genomic 7:277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eisenberg E, Levanon EY (2003) Human housekeeping genes are compact. Trends Genet 19(7):362–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Urrutia AO, Hurst LD (2003) The signature of selection mediated by expression on human genes. Genome Res 13(10):2260–2264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Duret L, Mouchiroud D (2000) Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. Mol Biol Evol 17(1):68–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Drawid A, Jansen R, Gerstein M (2000) Genome-wide analysis relating expression level with protein subcellular localization. Trends Genet 16(10):426–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tartaglia GG, Vendruscolo M (2009) Correlation between mRNA expression levels and protein aggregation propensities in subcellular localisations. Mol Biosyst 5(12):1873–1876

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Su AI, Cooke MP, Ching KA, Hakak Y, Walker JR, Wiltshire T, Orth AP, Vega RG, Sapinoso LM, Moqrich A et al (2002) Large-scale analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(7):4465–4470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Huminiecki L, Lloyd AT, Wolfe KH (2003) Congruence of tissue expression profiles from gene expression atlas, SAGEmap and TissueInfo databases. BMC Genomics 4(1):31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. The Gene Ontology Consortium (2001) Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation. Genome Res 11(8):1425–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vander AJ, Sherman JH, Luciano DS (1998) Human physiology: the mechanisms of body function. WCB McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Niehrs C, Pollet N (1999) Synexpression groups in eukaryotes. Nature 402(6761):483–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, Li PW, Mural RJ, Sutton GG, Smith HO, Yandell M, Evans CA, Holt RA et al (2001) The sequence of the human genome. Science 291(5507):1304–1351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody MC, Baldwin J, Devon K, Dewar K, Doyle M, FitzHugh W et al (2001) Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409(6822):860–921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liao BY, Zhang J (2006) Low rates of expression profile divergence in highly expressed genes and tissue-specific genes during mammalian evolution. Mol Biol Evol 23(6):1119–1128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Akashi H (2001) Gene expression and molecular evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev 11(6):660–666

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schena M (2003) Microarray analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lehner B, Fraser AG (2004) Protein domains enriched in mammalian tissue-specific or widely expressed genes. Trends Genet 20(10):468–472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hartwig A (2001) Zinc finger proteins as potential targets for toxic metal ions: differential effects on structure and function. Antioxid Redox Signal 3(4):625–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gout JF, Kahn D, Duret L (2010) Paramecium Post-Genomics Consortium: the relationship among gene expression, the evolution of gene dosage, and the rate of protein evolution 6(5):e1000944 (Erratum in: PLoS Genet 6(6): doi:10.1371/annotation/c55d5089-ba2f-449d-8696-2bc8395978db)

  21. Pal C, Papp B, Hurst LD (2001) Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics 158(2):927–931

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Krylov DM, Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Koonin EV (2003) Gene loss, protein sequence divergence, gene dispensability, expression level, and interactivity are correlated in eukaryotic evolution. Genome Res 13(10):2229–2235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National 973 program of China (2004CB518605), the National 863 project of China (2006AA020501), the National Key Sci-Tech Special Project of China (2008ZX10002-020), the Project of the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission (03dz14086) and the National Natural Science foundation of China (30024001, 30771188).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qiang Li or Long Yu.

Electronic supplementary material

The following additional data include three tables. (1) Key statistics of the box-plot representation of the distribution of expression level of ranked genes which have been visualized in Fig. 1a. (2) Detailed information of highly expressed tissue-specific genes (ranks 1–4); (3) Gene number and total AD in tissues which have been illustrated in Fig. 3a.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 107 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 169 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (DOC 36 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Q., Liu, X., He, Q. et al. Systematic analysis of gene expression level with tissue-specificity, function and protein subcellular localization in human transcriptome. Mol Biol Rep 38, 2597–2602 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-010-0400-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-010-0400-z

Keywords

Navigation