Skip to main content
Log in

Does an Appeal to the Common Good Justify Individual Sacrifices for Genomic Research?

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In genomic research the ideal standard of free, informed, prior, and explicit consent is believed to restrict important research studies. For certain types of genomic research other forms of consent are therefore proposed which are ethically justified by an appeal to the common good. This notion is often used in a general sense and this forms a weak basis for the use of weaker forms of consent. Here we examine how the notion of the common good can be related to individual health, health care, and genomic research and we use this analysis to propose more precise criteria to justify forms of consent which diverge from the ideal standard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, B. and E. Arnason (1999). Iceland’s Database is Ethically Questionable. British Medical Journal 318:1565

    Google Scholar 

  • Beskow, L., W. Burke, and J. Merz et al. (2001) Informed Consent for Population-Based Research Involving Genetics. Journal of the American Medical Association 286:2315–2321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows B. “Second Thoughts about U.S. Patent #4,438,032,” Bulletin of Medical Ethics, Jan 1997: 11–14.

  • CIOMS. International Guidelines for Ethical Review of Epidemiological Studies. Geneva 1991, http://www.cioms.ch/frame_1991_texts_of_guidelines.htm

  • CIOMS. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, Geneva 2002, http://www.cioms.ch/guidelines_nov2002_blurb.htm.

  • Collins, F. Testimony before the Appropriate Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education. U.S. Senate, July 11, 2001, http://www.genome.gov/10003483

  • Collins, F. , E. Green, A. Guttmacher, and M. Guyer (2003). A Vision for the Future of Genomics Research. Nature 422:835–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Article 2, 1997, http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/treaties/html/164.htm

  • Dworkin R. (1992). “Liberal Community”. In: Avineri S., De-Shalit A. (eds), Communitarianism and Individualism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 205–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Furness P., and R. Sullivan (2004). The Human Tissue Bill. British Medical Journal 328:533–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health Utilities Group (update 2006) “Health Utilities Index.” http://www.fhs.mcmaster.ca/hug.

  • Hoedemaekers, R., and W. Oortwijn (2003) Problematic Notions in Dutch Health Care Package Decisions. Health Care Analysis 11:287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, K. (2004). “Lack of Data Privacy Could Hamper Pharmacogenomics Studies.” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 3:725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings B., D. Callahan, and S. Wolf (1987) The Professions: Public Interest and Common Good. Hastings Center Report 17:S6

    Google Scholar 

  • London A. (2003) Threats to the Common Good. Hastings Center Report 33(5):17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannvernd, Association of Icelanders for Ethics in Science and Medicine. “The Icelandic Health Sector Database Act Stricken Down as Unconstitutional. A Landmark Decision by the Icelandic Supreme Court.” Iceland 2004, http://www.mannvernd.is/english/home.html.

  • Pasini, N. and M. Reichlin. “Solidarity, Citizenship and Selective Distributive Justice in Health Care”. In Solidarity in Health Care and Social Care in Europe. Edited by Meulen Ruud Ter, Arts Wil, Muffels Ruud 309–32. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001

  • Pörn I. (1993). Health and Adaptedness. Theoretical Medicine 40:295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouthard M., M-L. Essing-Bot, and G. Bonsel (2000). Disability Weights for Diseases A Modified Protocol and Results for a Western European Region. European Journal of Public Health 10:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streiner, D. and G. Norman. Health Measurement Scales. A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 35. In Elly Stolk, Elles Goes, Esther Kok and Jan van Busschbach. Uitwerking Criteria Noodzakelijkheid, Eigen Rekening en Verantwoording en Lifestyle. Report added as appendix 2 to College voor Zorgverzekeringen, Breedte Geneesmiddelenpakket. Amstelveen: College voor Zorgverzekeringen, 2001.

  • Taylor C. (1995) The Liberal-Communitarian Debate. In: T. Charles (eds) Philosophical Arguments. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, pp. 181–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouet C. (2004) New European Guidelines for the Use of Human Biological Materials in Biomedical Research. Journal of Medical Ethics 30:99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitbeck, C. “A Theory of Health.” In Concepts of Health and Disease: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Edited by A.L. Caplan, H.T. Engelhardt, Jr., and J.J. McCartney. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1981, 611–26

  • World Health Organization, WHO Definition of Health. Geneva 1948, http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/

  • World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. (General Assembly). Tokyo 2004. Article 3. http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rogeer Hoedemaekers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoedemaekers, R., Gordijn, B. & Pijnenburg, M. Does an Appeal to the Common Good Justify Individual Sacrifices for Genomic Research?. Theor Med Bioeth 27, 415–431 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-006-9015-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-006-9015-8

Keywords

Navigation