Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Discrete element analysis of stone cantilever stairs

  • New Trends in Mechanics of Masonry
  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stone cantilever staircases are present in case of both new constructions and reconstructions. The aim of the present paper is to understand the mechanical behaviour of these staircases with the help of discrete element simulations, and to compare the calculated behaviour to the estimations given by the existing manual calculation methods. First a literature review is presented on the statical calculation of cantilevered staircases: manual calculation methods suggested in the 1990s for straight and spiral staircases are introduced, focusing on Heyman’s theory and its improved counterparts. Then the discrete element method is used as a tool to perform virtual experiments, in order to evaluate the mechanical behaviour of the straight and spiral staircases for selfweight, live loads and support movement. The results obtained (internal forces, stresses, deflections) are then compared with the manual calculation results. The most important conclusions are: (1) the term “cantilever stair” is misleading: significant torsion moments occur in the treads, while the bending moments are much smaller than in a free cantilever; (2) the type of the connection between wall and treads (i.e. the end of the tread is simply supported by the wall against translation and torsion, or it is also partly clamped) has a fundamental influence on the internal forces and stress distributions; (3) for simply supported treads the existing manual methods are conservative for straight stairs, but for spiral stairs they dangerously underestimate the torsional moments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angelillo M (2015) Static analysis of a Gustavino helical stair as a layered masonry shell. Comput Struct 119:298–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Angelillo M (2016) The equilibrium of helical stairs made of monolithic steps. Int J Archit Herit 10(6):675–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bagi K (2014) When Heyman’s Safe Theorem of rigid block systems fails: non-Heymanian collapse modes of masonry structures. Int J Solids Struct 51:2696–2705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brik JE (1896) Zur Verwerthung der Ergebnisse aus dem Berichte des Stiegenstufen – Ausschusses. Zeitschrift der oesterr. Ingenieur- und Architekte-Vereines, XLVIII. Jg., Nr. 22. (in German)

  5. Brik JE (1898) II. Bericht der Stiegenstufen – Ausschusses. Zeitschrift der oesterr. Ingenieur- und Architekte-Vereines, L. Jg., Nr. 31–32. (in German)

  6. Cundall PA (1971) A computer model for simulating progressive large scale movements in blocky rock systems. In: Proceedings of the symposium of the international society of rock mechanics, Vol 1, paper no II-8. Academic Press, Nancy, France

  7. Cundall PA, Hart DH (1992) Numerical modelling of discontinua. J Eng Comput 9:101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Godio M, Stefanou I, Sab K (2017) Effects of the dilatancy of joints and of the size of the building blocks on the mechanical behaviour of masonry structures. Meccanica (submitted)

  9. Heyman J (1966) The stone skeleton. Int J Solids Struct 2:249–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heyman J (1995) The mechanics of masonry stairs. In: Brebbia CA and Leftheris B (eds.): Structural studies of historical buildings. vol 2. Dynamics, repairs and restoration, southampton: computational mechanics Publ., pp. 259–265

  11. Kooharian A (1952) Limit Analysis of Voussoir (Segmental) and Concrete Arches. J Am Concr Inst 24(4):317–328

    Google Scholar 

  12. Little P, Hough M, Mullarkey E (2009) Stone cantilever stairs—inspection and analysis of cantilever stairs. Struct Eng 87(8):26–33

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huerta S (2008) The analysis of masonry architecture: a historical approach. Archit Sci Rev 51(4):297–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lemos JV (2007) Discrete element modelling of masonry structures. Int J Archit Herit 1:190–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maunder EAW (2005) Staircases as cantilevers or arches?—a question for limit analysis. In: Modena C, Lourenco PB, Roca C (eds) Structural analysis of historical constructions, 1st edn. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 569–576

    Google Scholar 

  16. O’Sullivan C (2011) Particulate discrete element modelling: a geomechanics perspective. Spon Press, Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Price S, Rogers H (2005) Stone cantilevered staircases. Struct Eng 83:29–36

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sarhosis V, Bagi K, Lemos JV, Milani G (2016) Computational modeling of masonry structures using the discrete element method. IGI Global, Hershey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Simon J, Bagi K (2016) Discrete element analysis of the minimum thickness of oval masonry domes. Int J Archit Herit 10(4):457–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was inspired by the discussions with Professor Santiago Huerta, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid; his generous help in exploring the literature of the subject is gratefully acknowledged. The authors express their gratitude to Itasca Consulting Group for providing the 3DEC code under the frame of the IEP program. The presented investigations were supported by the Hungarian National Research Fund under Grant No. 100770.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary

    Balázs Rigó

  2. Department of Structural Mechanics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary

    Katalin Bagi

Authors
  1. Balázs Rigó
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katalin Bagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katalin Bagi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rigó, B., Bagi, K. Discrete element analysis of stone cantilever stairs. Meccanica 53, 1571–1589 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-017-0739-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-017-0739-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation