Skip to main content
Log in

Consumers’ minimum time investments in meaningful consumption

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consumer well-being involves not only the pursuit of pleasure, but also the pursuit of meaning. However, little is known about how people perceive the costs and benefits of meaning- versus pleasure-oriented experiences. We find that compared to pleasure-oriented experiences, people expect meaning-oriented experiences to be more satisfying after meeting a minimum time investment (i.e., the perceived minimum amount of time needed to derive benefits from consumption; study 1). As a consequence, people choose to prolong their exposure to meaningful (vs. pleasurable) experiences following interruptions (study 2). We discuss the implications of minimum time investments for firms’ relationships with consumers and marketing communication design (web appendix).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All materials and data are available at the following OSF repository: https://osf.io/bgckx/?.

Notes

  1. https://aspredicted.org/VLN_J79

  2. https://aspredicted.org/D9Z_BGY

References

  • Alba, J. W., & Williams, E. F. (2013). Pleasure principles: A review of research on hedonic consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(1), 2–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Aaker, J. L., & Garbinsky, E. N. (2013). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 505–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. B., Pham, M. T., & Andrade, E. B. (2008). The nature and role of affect in consumer behavior. In Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 297–348). Routledge

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, R. J., Dunn, E. W., & Hershfield, H. E. (2017). Cousins or conjoined twins: How different are meaning and happiness in everyday life? Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(2–3), 199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 302–329). Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Kang, P., & Choi, I. (2014). Pleasure now, meaning later: Temporal dynamics between pleasure and meaning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 262–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, L. A., & Hicks, J. A. (2021). The science of meaning in life. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 561–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, L. A., Hicks, J. A., Krull, J. L., & Del Gaiso, A. K. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving: The time-ask effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 543–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, N. L., & Williams, L. E. (2022). Can’t buy me meaning? Lay theories impede people from deriving meaning and well-being from consumption. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, 101332.

  • Mead, N. L., & Williams, L. E. (2023). The pursuit of meaning and the preference for less expensive options. Journal of Consumer Research, 49(5), 741–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogilner, C., & Aaker, J. (2009). “The time vs. money effect”: Shifting product attitudes and decisions through personal connection. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L. D., & Meyvis, T. (2008). Interrupted consumption: Disrupting adaptation to hedonic experiences. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 654–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. B., & Raney, A. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 984–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36, 717–731.

  • Rudd, M., Catapano, R., & Aaker, J. (2019). Making time matter: A review of research on time and meaning. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(4), 680–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.

  • Soman, D. (2003). Prospective and retrospective evaluations of experiences: How you evaluate an experience depends on when you evaluate it. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16(1), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Sun, Y., & Kramer, T. (2021). Ritualistic consumption decreases loneliness by increasing meaning. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(2), 282–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zauberman, G. (2003). The intertemporal dynamics of consumer lock-in. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 405–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Philip Fernbach, Bart de Langhe, John Lynch, A. Peter McGraw, Nick Reinholtz, Margaret Campbell, Kathleen Vohs, and the CU Boulder LEAD Lab for their valuable feedback on this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Light.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 173 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carter, E.P., Williams, L.E. & Light, N. Consumers’ minimum time investments in meaningful consumption. Mark Lett (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-023-09709-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-023-09709-z

Keywords

Navigation