Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating students’ perceptions and attitudes toward computer-mediated project-based learning environment: A case study

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research investigated 68 secondary school students’ perceptions of their computer-mediated project-based learning environment and their attitudes towards Project Work (PW) using two instruments—Project Work Classroom Learning Environment Questionnaire (PWCLEQ) and Project Work Related Attitudes Instrument (PWRAI). In this project-based learning environment, students experienced a face-to-face classroom setting and e-learning by using a synchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) tool called ‘iCollaborate’ for online communication and project collaboration with peers from other countries. The PWCLEQ and PWRAI instruments were used to evaluate the computer-mediated project-based learning environment using students’ perceptions of the learning environment and to further investigate how their perceptions might affect their attitudes towards PW lessons. Students perceived the computer-mediated project-based learning environment favourably but they preferred to experience more Material Environment and more Open-Endedness and Social Presence. Simple correlation analysis revealed that all environment dimensions were significantly and positively related to the students’ attitudes towards PW, while multiple regression analysis indicated that two scales, Instructor Support and Social Presence, were the strongest predictors of attitudes towards PW lessons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asghar, M., & Fraser, B. (1995). Classroom environment and attitudes to science in Brunei Darussalam. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 18(2), 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, V., & Fisher, D. (2003). The validation and application of a new learning environment instrument to evaluate online learning in higher education. In M. S. Khine & D. Fisher (Eds.), Technology-rich learning environments: A future perspective (pp. 1–18). Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chionh, Y. H., & Fraser, B. J. (2009). Classroom environment, achievement, attitudes and self esteem in geography and mathematics in Singapore. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 18, 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deemer, S. A. (2004). Classroom goal orientation in high school classrooms: Revealing links between teacher beliefs and classroom environments. Educational Research, 46(1), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derntl, M., & Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2005). The role of structure, patterns and people in blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(2), 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorman, J. P. (2001). Associations between classroom environment and academic efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 4, 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorman, J. P., Adams, J. E., & Ferguson, J. M. (2003). A cross-national investigation of students’ perceptions of mathematics classroom environment and academic efficacy in secondary schools. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Retrieved November 1, 2009, from http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/dormanj.pdf.

  • Dziuban, C. D., Hartman, J. L., & Moskal, P. D. (2004). Blended Learning. EDUCAUSE Research Bulletin, 2004(7). Retrieved October 18, 2009, from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0407.pdf.

  • Dziuban, C. D., Moskal, P. D., & Hartman, J. (2005). Higher education, blended learning, and the generations: Knowledge is power: No more. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Engaging communities (pp. 85–100). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1981). Test of Science-Related Attitudes. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J., & Lee, S. S. U. (2009). Science laboratory classroom environments in Korean high schools. Learning Environments Research, 12, 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. In S. P. Robertson, G. M. Olson, & J. S. Olson (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology (pp. 79–84). New Orleans, LA: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, S. C., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Teacher interpersonal behaviour, classroom environment and student outcomes in primary mathematics in Singapore. Learning Environments Research, 1, 199–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopson, M. H., Simms, R. L., & Knezek, G. A. (2001). Using a technology-enriched environment to improve higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamaludin, A., & Quek, C. L. (2006). Using asynchronous online discussions in primary school project work. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22, 64–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khine, M. S., & Goh, S. C. (2001, December). Investigation of tertiary classroom learning environment in Singapore. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle, Australia.

  • Kim, H., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1999). Assessment and investigation of constructivist science learning environments in Korea. Research in Science and Technological Education, 17, 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J. W., Kreijns, K., & Beers, P. J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., & Mayer, R. (1972). Development as the aim of education. Harvard Educational Review, 42, 449–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koistinen, K. (2002, April). Towards virtual academy—Teacher’s changing role. Paper presented at the FIG Congress 2002, Washington, DC.

  • Kwok, L. Y., & Tan, Y. G. (2004, May–June). Scaffolding supports in project-based learning through Knowledge Community: Collaborative learning strategies and pedagogical facilitation. Paper presented at the 8th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education (GCCCE2004), Hong Kong.

  • Lee, S. S. U., & Fraser, B. J. (2000, June–July). The constructivist learning environment of science classrooms in Korea. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Fremantle, Australia.

  • Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. P., & Tay, L. Y. (2004). Engagement in higher order thinking mediated by ICT tools. In C. P. Lim (Ed.), Integrating ICT in education (pp. 102–126). Singapore: McGraw Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majeed, A., Fraser, B. J., & Aldridge, J. M. (2002). Learning environment and its associations with student satisfaction among mathematics students in Brunei Darussalam. Learning Environments Research, 5, 203–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J., Brandt, R. S., Hughes, C. S., Jones, B. F., Presseisen, B. Z., Rankin, S. C., et al. (1988). Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & McTighe, J. (1993). Assessing student outcomes: Performance assessment using the dimensions of learning model. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, D. (1991). Constructivism and instructional design. Educational Technology, 31(5), 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1974). The social climate scales: An overview. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picciano, A. G. (2006). Blended Learning: Implications for growth and access. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(3), 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postholm, M. B., Pettersson, T., Flem, A., & Gudmundsdottir, S. (2002, June). The teacher’s role when pupils use ICT during project work. Paper presented at the ISCAR Conference, Amsterdam.

  • Quek, C. L. (2009). Designing a computer-supported project-based learning environment for high school students: A case study. Journal for Computing Teachers, Spring 2009. Retrieved October 7, 2009, from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Membership/SIGs/SIGCS_Computer_Science_/JCTJournalforComputingTeachers/PastIssues/2009/Spring/lang_designing.pdf.

  • Quek, C. L., Divaharan, S., Liu, W. C., Peer, J., Williams, M. D., Wong, A. F. L., et al. (Eds.). (2005a). Engaging in project work. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education (Asia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quek, C. L., Peer, J., Divaharan, S., Williams, M. D., Wong, A. F. L., & Jamaludin, A. (2005b). Computer mediated communication as a collaborative tool for facilitating student-centered learning in project-based classrooms. Educational Technology, 45(4), 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quek, C. L., & Wong, A. F. L. (2002). Is my project work classroom environment conducive for student collaboration? Teaching and Learning, 23(2), 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quek, C.-L., Wong, A. F. L., Divaharan, S., Liu, W.-C., Peer, J., & Williams, M. D. (2007). Secondary school students’ perceptions of teacher–student interaction and students’ attitudes towards project work. Learning Environments Research, 10(3), 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quek, R., Hui, T., & Masuath, M. (2005c, November–December). Use of scaffolds in an ICT project work. Paper presented at the Educational Research Association Conference, Singapore.

  • So, H.-J. (2009). When groups decide to use asynchronous online discussions: Collaborative learning and social presence under a voluntary participation structure. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., & Maher, G. (2000). Building knowledge building communities: Consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 359–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam, M. (2009). Constructivism, instructional design and technology. In J. Willis (Ed.), Constructivist instructional design: Foundations, models and examples (pp. 61–80). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C., & Kwok, P. (2005, November–December). Knowledge building in inter-school learning communities: Reflections from a case on project learning in Hong Kong. Paper presented at the International Conference in Computers in Education 2005, Singapore.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1930, 1933 and 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H. J., & Anderson, G. J. (1968). Classroom climate and individual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 414–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q. (2009). Designing a web-based constructivist learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. In B. Rogoff & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), Children’s learning in the “zone of proximal development” (pp. 7–18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, A. F. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1996). Environment-attitude associations in the chemistry laboratory classroom. Research in Science and Technological Education, 14, 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, T. M., & Quek, C. L. (2008). Investigating design and technology students’ participation and learning in a technology mediated learning environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 540–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T. (1998). Student Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Science (STATS). Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(2), 96–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 637616, Singapore

    Ling Ying Britta Seet & Choon Lang Quek

Authors
  1. Ling Ying Britta Seet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Choon Lang Quek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Choon Lang Quek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seet, L.Y.B., Quek, C.L. Evaluating students’ perceptions and attitudes toward computer-mediated project-based learning environment: A case study. Learning Environ Res 13, 173–185 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-010-9073-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-010-9073-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation