Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Supporting computer-mediated learning: A case study in online staff development and classroom learning environment assessment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid growth of online learning has led to the development of staff inservice evaluation models that are geared towards improving degree programs. Based on best practices in student online assessment, the Online Faculty Development and Classroom Learning Environment Assessment course was designed to serve the dual purpose of staff development and classroom learning environment assessment. Results of analyses showed that the course maximised the potential of online staff development for encouraging staff to reflect on Curriculum and Teaching Capacities (CTC). Implications are discussed in terms of emphasising the process of online CTC learning and incorporating perspectives to capture a comprehensive view of staff teaching attitudes and their association with student perceptions of the classroom learning environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). A cross-cultural study of classroom learning environments in Australia and Taiwan. Learning Environments Research, 3, 101–134. doi:10.1023/A:1026599727439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badley, G. (2000). Developing globally-competent university teachers. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37, 244–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne, C. (2003). Online evaluations of teaching: An examination of current practice and considerations for the future. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 96, 103–112. doi:10.1002/tl.127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barfield, R. L. (2003). Students’ perceptions of and satisfaction with group grades and the group experience in the college classroom. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(4), 49–64. doi:10.1080/0260293032000066191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, C. D. (2003). Online collection of midterm student feedback. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 96, 95–101. doi:10.1002/tl.126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caffarella, R. S., & Zinn, L. F. (1999). Professional development for faculty: A conceptual framework of barriers and supports. Innovative Higher Education, 23, 241–254. doi:10.1023/A:1022978806131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2004). Classroom participation and discussion effectiveness: Student-generated strategies. Communication Education, 53, 103–115. doi:10.1080/0363452032000135805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorman, J. P. (2000). Validation and use of an instrument to assess university-level psychosocial environment in Australian universities. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 24, 25–38. doi:10.1080/030987700112291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellett, C. D., Loup, K. S., Culross, R. R., Mcmullen, J. H., & Rugutt, J. K. (1997). Assessing enhancement of learning, personal learning environment, and student efficacy: Alternatives to traditional faculty evaluation in higher education. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 167–192. doi:10.1023/A:1007989320210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgibbon, K. M., & Jones, N. (2004). Jumping the hurdles: Challenges of staff development delivered in a blended learning environment. Journal of Educational Media, 29, 25–35. doi:10.1080/1358165042000186253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–33. doi:10.1023/A:1009932514731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., & Kwan, K. P. (2002). Does the use of student feedback questionnaires improve the overall quality of teaching? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 411–425. doi:10.1080/0260293022000009294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Pihlajamäki, H., & Kotkas, T. (2003). What makes a student group successful? Student-student and student-teacher interaction in a problem-based learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 6, 59–76. doi:10.1023/A:1022963826128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, J. W., Saudargas, R. A., Gibson, L. W., & Leong, F. T. (2005). An investigation of broad and narrow personality traits in relation to general and specific life satisfaction of college students. Research in Higher Education, 46, 707–729. doi:10.1007/s11162-004-4140-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijhuis, G. G., & Collis, B. (2003). Using a web-based course-management system. An evaluation of management tasks and time implications for the instructor. Evaluation and Program Planning, 26, 193–201. doi:10.1016/S0149-7189(03)00005-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (2003). Exploring technology-mediated learning from a pedagogical perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 11, 111–126. doi:10.1076/ilee.11.2.111.14136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D. D. (1997). Reconceptualizing the evaluation of teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 34, 23–44. doi:10.1023/A:1003046127941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G. (2005). Flying not flapping: A strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions. ALT-J Research in Learning Technology, 13, 201–218. doi:10.1080/09687760500376439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelfhout, W., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2004). The use of self, peer and teacher assessment as a feedback system in a learning environment aimed at fostering skills of cooperation in an entrepreneurial context. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 177–201. doi:10.1080/0260293042000188465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tigelaar, D. E. H., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & Van Der Vleuten, B. C. P. M. (2004). The development and validation of a framework for teaching competencies in higher education. Higher Education, 48, 253–268. doi:10.1023/B:HIGH.0000034318.74275.e4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, E. H., & Galambos, N. (2004). What satisfies students? Mining student-opinion data with regression and decision tree analysis. Research in Higher Education, 45, 251–269. doi:10.1023/B:RIHE.0000019589.79439.6e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, B., Jones, S., Straker, L., & Cole, J. (2003). Course evaluation on the web: Facilitating student and teacher reflection to improve learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 96, 81–93. doi:10.1002/tl.125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlenbeck, A. M., Verloop, N., & Beijaard, D. (2002). Requirements for an assessment procedure for beginning teachers: Implications from recent theories on teaching and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104, 242–272. doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villar, L. M. (Dir.). (2001). Metaevaluación: un Inquietante Modelo [Metaevaluation: A disturbing model]. Revista de Enseñanza Universitaria [University Teaching Journal], 17, 43–76.

  • Villar, L. M. (2004). Programa para la Mejora de la Docencia Universitaria [Program for improving university teaching]. Madrid, Spain: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villar, L. M., & Alegre, O. M. (2004). Manual para la Excelencia en la Enseñanza Superior [Handbook for excellence in higher education]. Madrid, Spain: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierstra, R. F. A. (1999). Learning environment perceptions of European university students. Learning Environments Research, 2, 79–98. doi:10.1023/A:1009962024666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, T. M., Hable, M. P., Preston, M. M., & Magliaro, S. G. (2000). Faculty study groups: Solving “good problems” through study, reflection, and collaboration. Innovative Higher Education, 24, 247–263. doi:10.1023/B:IHIE.0000047413.00693.8c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, A. C. (2002). The impact of student perceptions and characteristics on teaching evaluations: A case study in finance education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 49–64. doi:10.1080/02602930120105054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Didactics and School Organisation, School of Education, University of Seville, Camilo José Cela Street, 41018, Seville, Spain

    Luis Miguel Villar Angulo

  2. School of Education, University of La Laguna, Módulo B. Edificio Central, 38204, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain

    Olga María Alegre de la Rosa

Authors
  1. Luis Miguel Villar Angulo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Olga María Alegre de la Rosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Miguel Villar Angulo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Villar Angulo, L.M., Alegre de la Rosa, O.M. Supporting computer-mediated learning: A case study in online staff development and classroom learning environment assessment. Learning Environ Res 11, 211–226 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-008-9045-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-008-9045-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation