Abstract
Landscape ecology is in a position to become the scientific basis for sustainable landscape development. When spatial planning policy is decentralised, local actors need to collaborate to decide on the changes that have to be made in the landscape to better accommodate their perceptions of value. This paper addresses two prerequisites that landscape ecological science has to meet for it to be effective in producing appropriate knowledge for such bottom-up landscape-development processes—it must include a valuation component, and it must be suitable for use in collaborative decision-making on a local scale. We argue that landscape ecological research needs to focus more on these issues and propose the concept of landscape services as a unifying common ground where scientists from various disciplines are encouraged to cooperate in producing a common knowledge base that can be integrated into multifunctional, actor-led landscape development. We elaborate this concept into a knowledge framework, the structure–function–value chain, and expand the current pattern–process paradigm in landscape ecology with value in this way. Subsequently, we analyse how the framework could be applied and facilitate interdisciplinary research that is applicable in transdisciplinary landscape-development processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson BJ (2008) Research in the Journal Landscape Ecology, 1987–2005. Landscape Ecol 23:129–134. doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9187-2
Antrop M (2001) The language of landscape ecologists and planners—a comparative content analysis of concepts used in landscape ecology. Landsc Urban Plan 55:163–173. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00151-7
Antrop M (2007) Reflecting upon 25 years of landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol 22:1441–1443. doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9170-y
Azerrad JM, Nilon CH (2006) An evaluation of agency conservation guidelines to better address planning efforts by local government. Landsc Urban Plan 77:255–262. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.03.001
Bailey N, Lee JT, Thompson S (2006) Maximising the natural capital benefits of habitat creation: spatially targeting native woodland using GIS. Landsc Urban Plan 75:227–243. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.03.004
Bastian O (2001) Landscape ecology-towards a unified discipline? Landscape Ecol 16:757–766. doi:10.1023/A:1014412915534
Bastian O, Krönert R, Lipský Z (2006) Landscape diagnosis on different spatial and time scales—a challenge for landscape planning. Landscape Ecol 21:359–374. doi:10.1007/s10980-005-5224-1
Bennett AF, Radford JQ (2004) Landscape-level requirements for the conservation of woodland birds: are there critical thresholds in habitat cover? In: Smithers R (ed) Landscape and ecology of trees and forests. Proceedings of the woodland trust and international association of landscape ecology—UK region conference, Gloucestershire
Berkes F (2004) Rethinking community-based conservation. Conserv Biol 18:621–630. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x
Bianchi FJJA, Booij CJH, Tscharntke T (2006) Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 273:1715–1727. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3530
Bianchi FJJA, Goedhart PW, Baveco JM (2008) Enhanced pest control in cabbage crops near forest in The Netherlands. Landscape Ecol 23:595–602. doi:10.1007/s10980-008-9219-6
Blaschke T (2006) The role of the spatial dimension within the framework of sustainable landscapes and natural capital. Landsc Urban Plan 75:198–226. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.013
Brody SD, Highfield W, Carrasco V (2004) Measuring the collective planning capabilities of local jurisdictions to manage ecological systems in southern Florida. Landsc Urban Plan 69:33–50. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.09.002
Brunckhorst D, Coop P, Reve I (2006) “Eco-civic”optimisation: a nested framework for planning and managing landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 75:265–281. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.04.001
Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson MN, Eckly N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchel RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8086–8091. doi:10.1073/pnas.1231332100
Chee YE (2004) An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services. Biol Conserv 120:549–565. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.028
Chiesura A, de Groot R (2003) Critical natural capital: a socio-cultural perspective. Ecol Econ 44:219–231. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00275-6
Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8059–8061. doi:10.1073/pnas.1231333100
Council of Europe (2000) The European landscape convention, URL: www.coe.int/EuropeanLandscapeConvention
Cowling RM, Egoh B, Knight AT, O’Farrell PJ, Reyers B, Rouget M, Roux DJ, Welz A, Wilhelm-Rechman A (2008) An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9483–9488. doi:10.1073/pnas.0706559105
Daily GC (ed) (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington
De Groot RS (2006) Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 75:175–186. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.016
De Groot RS, Wilson M, Boumans R (2002) A typology for the description, classification and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
DeFries RS, Foley JA, Asner GP (2004) Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Front Ecol Environ 2:249–257
Dramstad WE, Fjellstad WJ, Sundlii Tveit M, Fry GLA (2006) Relationship between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landsc Urban Plan 78:465–474. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.006
Duff G, Garnett D, Jacklyn P, Landsberg J, Ludwig J, Morrison J, Novelly P, Walker D, Whitehead P (2008) A collaborative design to adaptively manage for landscape sustainability in north Australia: lessons from a decade of cooperative research. Landscape Ecol (in press). doi:10.1007/s10980-008-9236-5
Eiswerth ME, Haney JC (2001) Maximizing conserved biodiversity: why ecosystem indicators and thresholds matter. Ecol Econ 38:259–274. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00166-5
Elbakidze M, Angelstam P, Axelsson R (2007) Sustainable forest management as an approach to regional development in the Russian Federation: state and trends in Kovdozersky Model Forest in the Barents region. Scand J For Res 22(6):568–581. doi:10.1080/02827580701804179
Ezrahi Y (1980) Utopian and pragmatic rationalism: the political context of scientific advice. Minerva: a review of science. Learn Policy 18:111–131
Fahrig L (2002) Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction thresholds: a synthesis. Ecol Appl 12:346–353
Farber SC, Constanza R, Wilson MA (2002) Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 41:375–392. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00088-5
Friedmann J (1993) Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning. J Am Plann Assoc 59:482–485. doi:10.1080/01944369308975902
Fry GLA (2001) Multifunctional landscapes—towards transdisciplinary science. Landsc Urban Plan 57:159–168. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00201-8
Fry G, Tress B, Tress G (2007) Integrative landscape research: facts and challenges. In: Wu J, Hobbs R (eds) Key topics in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 246–268
Gobster PH, Westphal LM (2004) The human dimension of urban greenways: planning for recreation and related experiences. Landsc Urban Plan 68:147–165. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00162-2
Grêt-Regamey A, Walz A, Bebi P (2008) Valuing ecosystem services for sustainable landscape planning in Alpine regions. Mt Res Dev 28:156–165. doi:10.1659/mrd.0951
Haines-Young R (2000) Sustainable development and sustainable landscapes: defining a new paradigm for landscape ecology. Fennia 178:7–14
Hanski I (1994) A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J Anim Ecol 63:151–162
Harms B, Knaapen JP, Rademakers JG (1993) Landscape planning for nature restoration: comparing regional scenarios. In: Vos CC, Opdam P (eds) Landscape ecology of a stressed environment. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 197–218
Haughton G, Counsell D (2004) Regions, spatial strategies and sustainable development. Routledge, New York
Hein L, Van Koppen K, De Groot RS, Van Ierland E (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57:209–228. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005
Helming K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P (eds) (2007) Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, Berlin
Hisschemöller M, Hoppe R (1995) Coping with intractable controversies: the case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis. Knowl Technol Policy 8:40–60. doi:10.1007/BF02832229
Hisschemöller M, Tol RSJ, Vellinga P (2001) The relevance of participatory approaches in integrated environmental assessment. Integr Assess 2:57–72. doi:10.1023/A:1011501219195
Horlick-Jones T, Sime J (2004) Living on the border: knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity. Futures 36:441–456. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.006
Huggett AJ (2005) The concept and utility of ‘ecological thresholds’ in biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 124:301–310. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.037
IUCN (1992) The Rio declaration on the environment. IUCN, UNEP, WWF, Gland
Jack BK, Kousky C, Sims KRE (2008) Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9465–9470. doi:10.1073/pnas.0705503104
Jackson LL (2008) Who “designs” the agricultural landscape? Landsc J 27:23–40. doi:10.3368/lj.27.1.23
Jobin B, Beaulieu J, Grenier M, Bélanger L, Maisonneuve C, Bordage D, Filion B (2003) Landscape changes and ecological studies in agricultural regions, Quebec, Canada. Landscape Ecol 18:575–590. doi:10.1023/A:1026047625427
Leitão AB, Ahern J (2002) Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 59:65–93. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00005-1
Li F, Wang R, Paulussen J, Liu X (2005) Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: a case study in Beijing, China. Landsc Urban Plan 72:325–336. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.04.002
Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J, Cunningham RB (2005) Native vegetation cover thresholds associated with species response. Biol Conserv 124:311–316. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.038
Linehan JR, Gross M (1998) Back to the future, back to basics: the social ecology of landscapes and the future of landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 43:207–223. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00088-7
Lovell ST, Johnston DM (2008) Creating multifunctional landscapes: how can the field of ecology inform the design of landscape? Front Ecol Environ 7. e-View. doi:10.1890/070178
Luz F (2000) Participatory landscape ecology: a basis for acceptance and implementation. Landscape Ecol 50:157–166
Macleod CJA, Scholefield D, Haygarth PM (2007) Integration for sustainable catchment management. Sci Total Environ 373:591–602. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.12.029
Martinez ML, López-Barrera F (2008) Special issue: restoring and designing ecosystems for a crowded planet. Ecoscience 15:1–5. doi:10.2980/1195-6860(2008)15[1:SIRADE]2.0.CO;2
Matsuoka RH, Kaplan R (2008) People needs in the urban landscape: analysis of Landscape and Urban Planning contributions. Landsc Urban Plan 84:7–19. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.009
McNie EC (2007) Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ Sci Policy 10:17–38. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.004
Metzger MJ, Schröder D (2006) Towards a spatially explicit and quantitative vulnerability assessment of environmental change in Europe. Reg Environ Change 6:201–216. doi:10.1007/s10113-006-0020-2
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Island Press, Washington
Morris J, Camilleri M, Moncada S (2007) Key sustainability issues in European sensitive regions—a participatory approach. In: Helming K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P (eds) Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, Berlin, pp 451–470
Muňoz-Erickson TA, Aquilar-Gonzáles B, Sisk TD (2007) Linking ecosystem health indicators and collaborative management: a systematic framework to evaluate ecological and social outcomes. Ecol. Soc. 12:6 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art6/
Musacchio L, Wu J (2004) Collaborative landscape-scale ecological research: emerging trends in urban and regional ecology. Urban Ecosyst 7:175–178. doi:10.1023/B:UECO.0000044034.55695.bd
Nassauer J, Opdam P (2008) Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecol 23:633–644. doi:10.1007/s10980-008-9226-7
Nassauer JI, Allan JD, Johengen T, Kosek SE, Infante D (2004) Exurban residential subdivision development: effects on water quality and public perception. Urban Ecosyst 7:267–281. doi:10.1023/B:UECO.0000044039.65448.48
Nohl W (2001) Sustainable landscape use and aesthetic perception—preliminary reflections on future landscape aesthetics. Landsc Urban Plan 54:223–237. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00138-4
Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2001) Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Blackwell, Malden
O’Neill RV (2001) Is it time to bury the ecosystem concept? (With full military honors of course!). Ecology 82:3275–3284
Ojeda MI, Mayer AS, Solomon BD (2008) Economic valuation of environmental services sustained by water flows in the Yaqui River Delta. Ecol Econ 65:155–166. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.006
Olsson P, Folke C, Hahn T (2004) Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in Southern Sweden. Ecol. Soc. 9, 4 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss4/art2
Opdam P, Foppen R, Vos CC (2002) Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol 16:767–779. doi:10.1023/A:1014475908949
Opdam P, Verboom J, Pouwels R (2003) Landscape cohesion: an index for the conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversity. Landscape Ecol 18:113–126. doi:10.1023/A:1024429715253
Opdam P, Pouwels R, Van Rooij S, Steingröver E, Vos CC (2008) Setting biodiversity targets in participatory landscape planning: introducing the ecoprofile approach. Ecol. Soc. 13(1):20 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art20/
Palmer M, Bernhardt E, Chornesky EA, Collins SL, Dobson AP, Duke CS, Gold BD, Jacobson RB, Kingsland SE, Kranz RH, Mappin MJ, Martinez ML, Micheli F, Morse JL, Pace ML, Pascual M, Palumbi SS, Reichman OJ, Simons A, Townsend AR, Turner MG (2004) Ecology for a crowded planet. Science 304:1251–1252. doi:10.1126/science.1095780
Palmer M, Bernhardt E, Chornesky E, Collins S, Dobson A, Duke C, Gold B, Jacobson R, Kingsland S, Kranz R, Mappin M, Martinez M, Micheli F, Morse J, Pace M, Pascual M, Palumbi S, Reichman O, Townsend A, Turner M (2005) Ecological science and sustainability for the 21st century. Front Ecol Environ 3:4–11
Patil GP, Brooks RP, Myers WL, Rapport DJ, Taillie C (2001) Ecosystem health and its measurement at landscape scale: toward the next generation of quantitative assessments. Ecosyst Health 7:308–316. doi:10.1046/j.1526-0992.2001.01034.x
Potschin M, Haines-Young R (2006) “Rio+10”, sustainability science and landscape ecology. Landsc Urban Plan 75:162–174. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.03.005
Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH (1999) The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves. Conserv Biol 13:484–492. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97428.x
Rogge E, Nevens F, Gulinck H (2007) Perception of rural landscapes in Flanders: looking beyond aesthetics. Landsc Urban Plan 82:159–174. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.006
Rössler M (2006) World heritage cultural landscapes: a UNESCO flagship programme 1992–2006. Landscape Res 31:333–353
Ryan RL, Fábos JG, Allan JJ (2006) Understanding opportunities and challenges for collaborative greenway planning in New England. Landsc Urban Plan 76:172–191
Schultz L, Folke C, Olsson P (2007) Enhancing ecosystem management through social-ecological inventories: lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Sweden. Environ Conserv 34:140–152. doi:10.1017/S0376892907003876
Sepp K, Bastian O (2007) Studying landscape change: indicators, assessment and application. Landsc Urban Plan 79:125–126. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.002
Steiner F (2000) The living landscape: an ecological approach to landscape planning, 2nd edn. McGraw–Hill, New York
Stephenson J (2008) The cultural values model: an integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 84:127–139. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.003
Termorshuizen JW, Opdam P, Van den Brink A (2007) Incorporating ecological sustainability in landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 79:374–384. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.04.005
Theobald DM, Hobbs NT, Bearly T, Zack JA, Shenk T, Riebsame WE (2000) Incorporating biological information in local land use decision-making: designing a system for conservation planning. Landscape Ecol 15:35–45. doi:10.1023/A:1008165311026
Tippett J, Handley JF, Ravetz J (2007) Meeting the challenge of sustainable development—a conceptual appraisal of a new methodology for participatory ecological planning. Prog Plann 67:9–98. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2006.12.004
Tress B, Tress G, Décamps H, d’Hauteserre A-M (2001) Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research. Landsc Urban Plan 57:137–141. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00199-2
Tress G, Tress B, Fry G (2005) Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol 20:479–493. doi:10.1007/s10980-004-3290-4
Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x
Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern and process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:171–197. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001131
Veldkamp A, Lambin EF (2001) Editorial: predicting land-use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 85:1–6. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00199-2
Wallace KJ (2007) Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biol Conserv 139:235–246. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.015
Wiens J, Moss M (eds) (2005) Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Wu J (2006) Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainability science. Landscape Ecol 21:1–4. doi:10.1007/s10980-006-7195-2
Wu J, Hobbs R (2007) Landscape ecology: the state-of-the-science. In: Wu J, Hobbs R (eds) Key topics in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 271–287
Acknowledgments
This study is part of the “Ecosystem and Landscape Services” research programme of Wageningen University and Research Centre and financed by the strategic research programme “Sustainable spatial development of ecosystems, landscapes, seas and regions”, commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Conservation, and Food Quality. We thank Barbara Sterk, Laura Musacchio, and the anonymous reviewers for suggesting valuable improvements to the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Termorshuizen, J.W., Opdam, P. Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecol 24, 1037–1052 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9314-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9314-8