Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Building patterns and landscape fragmentation in northern Wisconsin, USA

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Housing growth is prevalent in rural areas in the United States and landscape fragmentation is one of its many effects. Since the 1930s, rural sprawl has been increasing in areas rich in recreational amenities. The question is how housing growth has affected landscape fragmentation. We thus tested three hypotheses relating land cover and land ownership to density and spatial pattern of buildings, and examined whether building density or spatial pattern of buildings was a better predictor for landscape fragmentation. Housing locations were mapped from 117 1:24,000-scale USGS topographic maps across northern Wisconsin. Patch-level landscape metrics were calculated on the terrestrial area remaining after applying 50, 100 and 250 m disturbance zones around each building. Our results showed that building density and the spatial pattern of buildings were affected mostly by lake area, public land ownership, and the abundance of coniferous forest, agricultural land, and grassland. A full 40% of the houses were within 100 m of lakeshores. The clustering of buildings within 100 m of lakeshores limited fragmentation farther away. In contrast, agricultural and grassland areas were correlated with higher building density, higher fragmentation, and more dispersed building pattern possible legacies of agricultural settlement patterns. Understanding which factors influence building density and fragmentation is useful for landscape level planning and ecosystem management in northern Wisconsin and areas that share similar social and environmental constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer RE (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. US Department of the Interior Geological Survey, Washington, DC

  • Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt R (1997) Basing cluster techniques on development densities appropriate to the area. J Am Plann Assoc 63:137–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden DL (1977) Four papers on farm family response to a negative income tax. Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

  • Black JD, Gray LC (1925) Land settlement and colonization in the Great Lakes states (Department Bulletin No. 1295). Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture in cooperation with the Agricultural Experiment Station of the University of Minnesota

  • Brittingham MC, Temple SA (1983) Have cowbirds caused forest songbirds to decline? BioScience 33:31–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DG (2003) Land use and forest cover on private parcels in the Upper Midwest USA, 1970 to 1990. Landsc Ecol 18:777–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen VR (1958) Farms or forest; evolution of a state land policy for northern Wisconsin, 1850–1932. University of Wisconsin Press, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S, Hadi AS, Price B (2000) Regression analysis by example, 3rd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen DL, Herwig BR, Schindler DE, Carpenter SR (1996) Impacts of lakeshore residential development on coarse woody debris in north temperate lakes. Ecol Appl 6:1143–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JS, Temple SA (1993) Rural residents’ free-ranging domestic cats – a survey. Wildl Soc Bull 21:381–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer JF, Childs GM (2004) Movement of people across the landscape: a blurring of distinctions between areas, interests, and issues affecting natural resource management. Landsc Urban Plann 69:153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (1997) Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J Wildl Manage 61:603–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flader SL (1983) The Great Lakes forest. University of Minnesota Press and Forest Historic Society, Santa Cruz, USA

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries RF (1951) Empire in pine: the story of lumbering in Wisconsin 1830–1900. Wisconsin State Historical Society, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen LE, Eagles PFJ, Mackay RJ (1995) Effects of residential development on forest-dwelling neotropical migrant songbirds. Conserv Biol 9:1408–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuguitt GV (1985) The nonmetropolitan population turnaround. Ann Rev Sociol 11:259–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuguitt GV, Brown DL (1990) Residential preferences and population redistribution – 1972–1988. Demography 27:589–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garber DS, Burger J (1995) A 20-year study documenting the relationship between turtle decline and human recreation. Ecol Appl 5:1151–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobster PH, Haight RG, Shriner D (2000) Landscape change in the Midwest: an integrated research and development program J For 98:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobster PH, Rickenbach MG (2004) Private forestland parcelization and development in Wisconsin’s Northwoods: perceptions of resource-oriented stakeholders. Landsc Urban Plann 69:165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman RB (1932) Forest land use in Wisconsin. Report of the Committee on Land Use and Forestry. Madison, Wisconsin, USA

  • Hansen AJ, Rasker R, Maxwell B, Rotella JJ, Johnson JD, Partmenter AW, Langner U, Cohen WB, Lawrence RL, Kraska MPV (2002) Ecological cause and consequence of demographic change in the New West. BioScience 52:151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer RB, Stewart SI, Winkler RL, Radeloff VC, Voss PR (2004) Characterizing dynamic spatial and temporal residential density patterns from 1940–1990 across the North Central United States. Landsc Urban Plann 69:183–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawbaker TJ, Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Clayton MK (2005) Road density and landscape pattern in relation to housing density, land ownership, land cover, and soils. Landsc Ecol 20:609–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimlich RE, Anderson WD (2001) Development at the urban fringe and beyond: impacts on agriculture and rural land. ERS Agricultural Economic Report No. 803, US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC

  • Hockin D, Ounsted M, Gorman M, Hill D, Keller V, Barker MA (1992) Examination of the effects of disturbance on birds with reference to its importance in ecological assessments. Environ Manage 36:253–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler M (1999) Scale, birds, and human decisions: a potential for integrative research in urban ecosystems. Landsc Urban Plann 45:15–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva P (1990) Population-dynamics in spatially complex environments – theory and data. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 330:175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluza DA, Griffin CR, DeGraaf RM (2000) Housing developments in rural New England: effects on forest birds. Anim Conserv 3:15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay AR, Gillum SS, Meyer MW (2002) Influence of lakeshore development on breeding bird communities in a mixed northern forest. Biol Conserv 107:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long L, Nucci A (1997) The ‘clean break’ revisited: is US population again deconcentrating? Environ Plann 29:1355–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan DA (1999) Natural amenities drive rural population change. Agricultural Economics Report No. 781. Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

  • Miller JR, Hobbs NT (2000) Effects of recreational trails on nest predation rates and predator assemblages. Landsc Urban Plann 50:227–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mladenoff DJ, White MA, Pastor J, Crow TR (1993) Comparing spatial pattern in unaltered old-growth and disturbed forest landscapes. Ecol Appl 3:294–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy RE (1931) The geography of the northwestern pine barrens of Wisconsin. Trans Wis Acad Sci, Arts Lett 26:96–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ (1996) Water, society and landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 11:193–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI (1995) Culture and changing landscape structure. Landsc Ecol 10:229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odell EA, Theobald DM, Knight RL (2003) Incorporating ecology into land use planning: the songbirds’ case for clustered development. J Am Plann Assoc 69:72–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostergren RC, Vale TR (1997) Wisconsin land and life. University of Wisconsin Press, Wisconsin, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-plus, statistics and computer. Springer, USA

  • Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI, Fried JS, Holcomb SS, McKeefry JF (2005a) The wildland urban interface in the United States. Ecol Appl 15:799–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI (2005b) Sprawl and forest fragmentation in the US Midwest from 1940 to 2000. Conserv Biol 19:793–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Voss PR, Hagen AE, Field DR, Mladenoff DJ (2001) Human demographic trends and landscape level forest management in the northwestern Wisconsin Pine Barrens. For Sci 47:229–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff VC, Mladenoff DJ, He HS, Boyce MS (1999) Forest landscape change in the northwestern Wisconsin Pine Barrens from pre-European settlement to the present. Can J For Res 29:1649–1659

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese HM, Lillesand TM, Nagel DE, Stewart JS, Goldmann RA, Simmons TE, Chipman JW, Tessar PA (2002) Statewide land cover derived from multiseasonal Landsat TM data – A retrospective of the WISCLAND project. Remote Sens Environ 82:224–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers JA, Smith HT (1995) Set-back distances to protect nesting bird colonies from human disturbance in Florida. Conserv Biol 9:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg J, Riera J, Turner MG, Voss PR (2002) Explaining human settlement patterns in a recreational lake district: Vilas County, Wisconsin, USA. Environ Manage 30:24–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte LA, Mladenoff DJ, Nordheim EV (2002) Quantitative classification of a historic northern Wisconsin landscape: mapping forests at regional scales. Can J For Res 32:1616–1638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns FW (1997) Physical environment supporting Lake States forests. St. Paul, USA. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-189, pp 1–7

  • Theobald MD, Miller JR, Hobbs NT, Miller RJ, Thompson HN (1997) Estimating the cumulative effects of development on wildlife habitat. Landsc Urban Plann 39:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 20:171–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton G, Fingelton B (1985) Spatial data analysis by example: point pattern and quantitative data. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • USFS (2001) Chequamegon – Nicolet National Forest. http://www.fs.usda.gov/r9/cnnf/general/history/index. html.Last accessed 6/4/2005

  • USGS National Mapping Program Standards (1996) 2/03/2003

  • Vos CC, Verboom J, Opdam PFM, Ter Braak CJF (2000) Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. Am Nat 183:24–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WI DNR) (1998) WISCLAND Land Cover (WLCGW930). Madison, Wisconsin, USA

  • Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WI DNR) (2002a) 1:100,000 Scale DNR-Managed Lands, Geodisc 2.1. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WI, USA

  • Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WI DNR) (2002b) 1:24,000 Scale Hydrography, Geodisc 2.1. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WI, USA

  • Woodford J, Meyer M (2003) Impact of lakeshore development on green frog abundance. Biol Conserv 110:277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are most grateful for support for the research by the North Central Research Station of the US Forest Service. D.J. Mladenoff, and two anonymous reviewers made valuable comments on earlier versions of this manuscript, and we greatly appreciate their helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volker C. Radeloff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gonzalez-Abraham, C.E., Radeloff, V.C., Hammer, R.B. et al. Building patterns and landscape fragmentation in northern Wisconsin, USA. Landscape Ecol 22, 217–230 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9016-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9016-z

Keywords

Navigation