Skip to main content
Log in

A device for uranium series leaching from glass fiber in HEPA filter

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the disposal of a high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) glass filter into the environment, the glass fiber should be leached to lower its radioactive concentration to the clearance level. To derive an optimum method for the removal of uranium series from a HEPA glass fiber, five methods were applied in this study. That is, chemical leaching by a 4.0 M HNO3–0.1 M Ce(IV) solution, chemical leaching by a 5 wt% NaOH solution, chemical leaching by a 0.5 M H2O2–1.0 M Na2CO3 solution, chemical consecutive chemical leaching by a 4.0 M HNO3 solution, and repeated chemical leaching by a 4.0 M HNO3 solution were used to remove the uranium series. The residual radioactivity concentrations of 238U, 235U, 226Ra, and 234Th in glass after leaching for 5 h by the 4.0 M HNO3–0.1 M Ce(IV) solution were 2.1, 0.3, 1.1, and 1.2 Bq/g. The residual radioactivity concentrations of 238U, 235U, 226Ra, and 234Th in glass after leaching for 36 h by 4.0 M HNO3–0.1 M Ce(IV) solution were 76.9, 3.4, 63.7, and 71.9 Bq/g. The residual radioactivity concentrations of 238U, 235U, 226Ra, and 234Th in glass after leaching for 8 h by a 0.5 M H2O2–1.0 M Na2CO3 solution were 8.9, 0.0, 1.91, and 6.4 Bq/g. The residual radioactivity concentrations of 238U, 235U, 226Ra, and 234Th in glass after consecutive leaching for 8 h by the 4.0 M HNO3 solution were 2.08, 0.12, 1.55, and 2.0 Bq/g. The residual radioactivity concentrations of 238U, 235U, 226Ra, and 234Th in glass after three repetitions of leaching for 3 h by the 4.0 M HNO3 solution were 0.02, 0.02, 0.29, and 0.26 Bq/g. Meanwhile, the removal efficiencies of 238U, 235U, 226Ra, and 234Th from the waste solution after its precipitation–filtration treatment with NaOH and alum for reuse of the 4.0 M HNO3 waste solution were 100, 100, 93.3, and 100%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chun YB (2007) Operation of nuclear fuel cycle examination facilities. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Dajeon. http://www.kornis21.kaeri.re.kr. Accessed 1 Jan 2007

  2. Leuze RE, Bond WD, Scheitlin FM (1980) Recovery of plutonium from HEPA filters by Ce(IV)-promoted dissolution of PuO2 and recycle of the cerium promoter. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. http://www.osti.gov. Accessed 22 July 1980

  3. Qureshi ZH, Strege DK (1994) Pilot-scale tests of HEME and HEPA dissolution process. Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Savannah River Technology Center, Aiken. http://www.osti.gov. Accessed June 1994

  4. Meikrantz DH, Bourne GL, McFee JN, Mex AN, Burdge BG, McConnell JW (1990) Method of recovering hazardous waste from phenolic resin filters. United States Patent 4995916, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC

  5. Argyle MD, Demmer RL, Archibald KE, Brewer KN, Pierson KA, Shackelford KR, Kline KS (1999) INEEL HEPA filter leach system: a mixed waste solution. Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Idaho falls. http://www.wmsym.org. Accessed 28 Feb 1999

  6. Donovan RI, O’Brien BH (1984) NWCF HEPA filter leaching demonstration results. Westinghouse Idaho Nuclear Company, Idaho Falls

    Google Scholar 

  7. McCray CW, Brewer KN (1992) HEPA filter leach system technical basis report, WINCO-1096. Westinghouse Idaho Nuclear Company, Idaho Falls

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chakavartty AC (1995) HEPA filter leaching concept validation trials at the Idaho chemical processing plant. Idaho national engineering laboratory, Idaho Falls. http://www.osti.gov. Accessed April 1995

  9. Kim G, Shon D, Park H, Choi W, Lee K (2011) The development of precipitation-filtering technology for uranium electrokinetic leachate. Sep Purif Technol 79:144–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gu B, Brooks SC, Roh Y, Jardine PM (2003) Geochemical reactions and dynamics during titration of a contaminated groundwater with high uranium, aluminum, and calcium. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67:2749–2761

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Luo W, Kelly SD, Kemner KM, Watson D, Zhou J, Jardine PM, Gu B (2009) Sequestering uranium and technetium through co-precipitation with aluminum in a contaminated acidic environment. Environ Sci Technol 43:7516–7522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Istok JD, Senko JM, Krumholz LR, Watson D, Bogle MA, Peacock A, Chang YJ, White DC (2004) In situ bioreduction of technetium and uranium in a nitrate contaminated aquifer. Environ Sci Technol 38:468–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Couston L, Pouyat D, Mpulin C, Decambox P (1995) Speciation of uranyl species in nitric acid medium by time-resolved laser-induced fluorescence. Appl Spectrosc 49:349–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou P, Gu B (2005) Extraction of oxidized and reduced forms of uranium from contaminated soils: the effects of carbonate concentration and pH. Environ Sci Technol 39:4435–4440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhattacharya PK, Saini RD, Ruikar PB (1982) Reaction between uranium(VI) and hydrogen peroxide in hydrochloric acid medium. Int J Chem Kinet 14:1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McFarlane L, Rollwagen D (1982) Hydrogen peroxide precipitation of uranium at Madawaha Mines. In: Proceedings Canadian Mineral Processors, Ottawa, Jan, Paper No. 8, pp 19–21

  17. Chung D, Seo H, Lee J, Yang H, Lee E, Kim K (2010) Oxidative leaching of uranium from SIMFUEL using Na2CO3–H2O2 solution. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 284:123–129

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dewberry RA, Casella VR, Sigg RA, Salaymeh SR, Moore FS, Pak DJ (2008) Holdup measurements for three visual examination and TRU remediation glovebox facilities at the Savannah River Site. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 275:541–554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sas D, Sladek P, Janda J (2010) Measuring alpha and beta activity of filter and swab samples with LSC. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 286:513–517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yasuoka Y, Ishikawa T, Tokonami S, Takahashi H, Sorimachi A, Shingi M (2009) Radon mitigation using an air cleaner. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 279: 885–891

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kim G, Lee S, Shon D, Park H, Choi W, Moon J (2011) Development of a method for nuclide leaching from glass fiber in HEPA filter. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 289:121–128

    Google Scholar 

  22. IAEA, Application of the conceptions of exclusion, exemption and clearance, Safety Guide, No. RS-G-1.7

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Nuclear Research & Development Program of the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) funded by the South Korean government (MEST).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gye-Nam Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, GN., Park, HM., Choi, WK. et al. A device for uranium series leaching from glass fiber in HEPA filter. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 293, 157–166 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-1628-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-1628-y

Keywords

Navigation