Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Who Are Popular, Liked, and Admired? Longitudinal Associations between Three Social Status and Academic-Social Behavior

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peer social status has been identified as central to youth’s development. Whereas the majority of studies has focused on popularity and likability, recent efforts emphasize the need to consider admiration which captures how much peers respect and want to be like particular youth. The current study examined the overlap between the three types of social status (popularity, likability, and admiration), and investigated concurrent and longitudinal associations between social status and academic-social behavior. At each of 2 waves (five months apart), 736 South Korean youth (Mage = 12.5; 53% girls) made behavioral and social status nominations of their peers in classes. Popularity, likability, and admiration were only weakly associated with each other, and each social status was characterized by distinct behavioral features. Specifically, admiration was most strongly associated with academic engagement and prosocial behavior. Cross-lagged models revealed a bidirectional relationship between academic engagement and admiration. Academic engagement led to gains in admiration and admiration led to increases in academic engagement. The findings emphasize the need to focus on admiration to support youth’s positive adjustment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, B. E., & Luthar, S. S. (2007). Peer-perceived admiration and social likability: contextual correlates of positive peer regard among suburban and urban adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(1), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00514.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, W. M., Sippola, L. K., & Newcomb, A. F. (2000). Variations in patterns of attraction of same- and other-sex peers during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 255–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, W. M., Gauze, C., Hoza, B., & Newcomb, A. F. (1993). Differences and consistency between same-sex and other-sex peer relationships during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 29, 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.2.25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Fu, R., & Leng, L. (2014). Culture and developmental psycho-pathology. In M. Lewis & K. D. Rudolph (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychopathology (pp. 225–241). New York, NY: Springer U.S.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cillessen, A. H., & Borch, C. (2006). Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: a growth curve modelling analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), 935–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.05.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cillessen, A. H. N., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cillessen, A. H. N., & van den Berg, Y. (2012). Popularity and school adjustment. In A. M. Ryan & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 135–164). Charlotte, NC: IAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruyn, E. H., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21(6), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558406293966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, J. K., & Gest, S. D. (2015). Peer norm salience for academic achievement, prosocial behavior, and bullying: implications for adolescent school experiences. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614524303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Taylor, A. Z., & Hudley, C. (1998). Exploring achievement values among ethnic minority early adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 606–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (1999). Children’s interpersonal perceptions as a function of sociometric and peer-perceived popularity. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 160(2), 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: a multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19(1), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. (2003). The core of Confucian learning. The American Psychologist, 58(2), 146–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.2.146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merten, D. E. (1996). Visibility and vulnerability: responses to rejection by nonaggressive junior high school boys. Journal of Early Adolescence, 16(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course- persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.4.674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • North, E. A., Ryan, A., Cortina, K., & Brass, N. R. (2019). Social status and classroom behavior in math and science during early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(3), 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0949-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: two distinct dimensions of peer status. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431698018002001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Acker, R. V. (2006). They’re cool: social status and peer group supports for aggressive boys and girls. Social Development, 15(2), 175–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodkin, P. C., & Ryan, A. M. (2012). Child and adolescent peer relations in educational context. APA: educational psychology handbook: Vol. 2. Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors, K. R. Harris, S. Graham, and T. Urdan. (Editors in Chief), 363–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-015.

  • Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., & Waller, E. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40(3), 378–387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peers interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, R. Lerner (Series Eds.), & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 571–645). New York, NY: Wiley.

  • Ryan, A. M., & Shin, H. (2018). Peers, academics and teachers. In W. B. Bukowski, B. Laursen & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships and groups (pp. 637–646). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H. (2017a). Friendship dynamics of adolescent aggression, pro-social behavior, and social status: the moderating role of gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(11), 2305–2320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2014a). Early adolescent friendships and academic adjustment: examining selection and influence processes with longitudinal social network analysis. Developmental Psychology, 50(11), 2462–2472. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. Z., & Graham, S. (2007). An examination of the relationship between achievement values and perceptions of barriers among low-SES African American and Latino students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 52–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, W. L., Banny, A. M., Kawabata, Y., Crick, N. R., & Gau, S. S. F. (2013). A cross-lagged structural equation model of relational aggression, physical aggression, and peer status in a Chinese culture. Aggressive Behavior, 39(4), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Véronneau, M. H., Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Dishion, T. J., & Tremblay, R. E. (2010). Transactional analysis of the reciprocal links between peer experiences and academic achievement from middle childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 773–790. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019816.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (2005). Peer relationships, motivation, and academic performance at school. In A. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 279–296). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Pomerantz, E. M., Qin, L., Logis, H., Ryan, A. M., & Wang, M. (2018). Characteristics of likability, perceived popularity, and admiration in the early adolescent peer system in the United States and China. Developmental Psychology, 54(8), 1568–1581. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Jeonbuk National University, 14-3 Social Science Building, Deokjin-gu, Baekje-daero 567, Jeonju, Chonbuk, 54896, South Korea

    Huiyoung Shin

Authors
  1. Huiyoung Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huiyoung Shin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The research was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Oklahoma State University. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of Oklahoma State University and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study. Students signed an assent form indicating that they understood the conditions and wanted to participate prior to starting the survey.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, H. Who Are Popular, Liked, and Admired? Longitudinal Associations between Three Social Status and Academic-Social Behavior. J Youth Adolescence 49, 1783–1792 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01222-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01222-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation