Skip to main content
Log in

Adolescent Risk Behavior Subgroups: An Empirical Assessment

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theories and prior research have outlined a constellation of adolescent risk behaviors that tend to co-occur, reflecting a general pattern. Although their generality has largely been supported, there is some question about how to best study and portray the relationship among these behaviors. This study used data from a survey administered to high school youth (n = 2549, 38 schools). The general population sample comprised an even split between boys and girls, averaged roughly 16 years of age, and was 59% White and 10% Hispanic/Latino. Using latent class analysis, four subgroups, comprised of varying types and degrees of risky behavior, were identified. Specifically, there were two groups that “abstained” and “experimented” with risky behaviors and two others that had higher, but somewhat distinct, patterns of such activities. These groups were then examined in relation to youth characteristics (e.g., mental and physical health, school performance) and socio-environmental factors (e.g., social support, parental monitoring) that may be useful for better understanding “problem behavior syndrome” and development of prevention strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We generally use the phrase “risky behaviors” in our study as we have a broad pool of measures that go past some extant definitions of problem behaviors. Nevertheless, there is considerable overlap between the two phrasings in the individual behaviors that are indicated.

  2. Of course, there are other problems in application (e.g., measurement error, use of appropriate levels of measurement) that can impact observed levels of explained variance in factor analysis of general problem behavior.

  3. These measures were dichotomized in an attempt to limit the number of parameters to be estimated in the models presented here. These items were chosen in part because they had limited variation beyond a “yes–no” distinction and, substantively, they were more suitable to such scaling than other measures included in the analysis (e.g., gambling, frequency of substance use). Some have argued against dichotomization in such analyses (MacCallum et al. 2002; cf. Farrington and Loeber 2000), so future replication of these results with less circumscribed measures is warranted.

  4. Cronbach’s alpha should be interpreted with caution in the current study due to the noncontinuous nature of many of the included variables.

  5. The Chi-Square may be problematic as a measure of fit in models with a high prevalence of sparse cells, particularly when coupled with the inclusion of a high volume of items (Nylund et al. 2007). In this case, the volume of items precluded the program’s computation of the Model Chi-Square value.

  6. A preliminary investigation of these model specifications suggests that the four class LCA model discussed here has a better fit than factor analysis specifications (e.g., BIC of 42873.27 compared to 43686.65 for the three component EFA). There is some evidence to suggest that a hybrid Factor Analysis/LCA model might provide a comparatively good fit, however (BIC = 42564.32). Further study of these alternative approaches to assessing risky behavior in adolescence is necessary.

References

  • Aas, H., Klepp, K., Laberg, J. C., & Aaro, L. E. (1995). Predicting adolescents’ intentions to drink alcohol: Outcome expectations and self-efficacy. Journal for the Study of Alcohol, 56, 293–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. P., Leadbeater, B. J., & Aber, J. L. (1990). The relationship of adolescents’ expectations and values to delinquency, hard drug use, and unprotected sexual intercourse. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ary, D. V., Duncan, T. E., Biglan, A., Metzler, C. W., Noell, J. W., & Smolkowski, K. (1999). Development of adolescent problem behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 141–150.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Babor, T. F., Higgins-Biddle, J. C., Saunders, J. B., & Monteiro, M. G. (2001). AUDIT: The alcohol use disorders identification test: Guidelines for use in primary care. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K. D. (1994). Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, G. M., Welte, J. W., Hoffman, J. A., & Dintcheff, B. A. (1999). Gambling and alcohol use among youth: Influences of demographic, socialization, and individual factors. Addictive Behaviors, 24, 749–767.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, R., Holditch-Davis, D., & Belyea, M. (2005). Clusters of problem behaviors. Research in Nursing & Health, 28, 230–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basen-Engquist, K., Edmundson, E. W., & Parcel, G. S. (1996). Structure of health risk behavior among high school students. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 74, 764–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2004). The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychological Methods, 9, 3–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchaine, T. P. (2003). Taxometrics and developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 501–527.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benda, B. B., & Corwyn, R. F. (2000). A test of the validity of delinquency syndrome construct in a homogenous sample. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 497–511.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (1997). A person-oriented approach to research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 291–319.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2007). 2007 Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Available at: www.cdc.gov/yrbss. Accessed on July 2, 2009.

  • Cheong, Y. F., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2000). Measurement and structural models for children’s problem behaviors. Psychological Methods, 5, 477–495.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, H., & Mobley, M. (2009). Gender and grade-level comparisons in the structure of problem behaviors among adolescents. Journal of Adolescence (forthcoming).

  • Clogg, C. C. (1995). Latent class models. In G. Arminger, C. C. Clogg, & M. E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 311–359). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. A., & Piquero, A. R. (2009). New evidence on the monetary value of saving a high risk youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M., & Wugalter, S. E. (1992). Latent class models for stage-sequential dynamic latent variables. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 131–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, F. M., Jessor, R., Donovan, J. E., & Fortenberry, J. D. (1995). Early initiation of sexual intercourse: The influence of psychosocial unconventionality. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 5, 93–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., Casas, J. F., & Mosher, M. (1997). Relational and overt aggression in preschool. Developmental Psychology, 33, 579–588.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., & Werner, N. E. (1998). Response decision processes in relational and overt aggression. Child Development, 69, 1630–1639.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delaware Drug and Alcohol Tracking Alliance. (2009). 2007 Delaware Secondary School Survey. Available at: http://www.udel.edu/delawaredata/reports.htm. Accessed on July 2, 2009.

  • Dembo, R., Williams, L., Wothke, W., Schmeidler, J., Getreu, A., Berry, E., et al. (1992). The generality of deviance: Replication of a structural model among high risk youths. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 200–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J. (2000). Cross-setting consistency in early adolescent psychopathology: Deviant friendships and problem behavior sequalae. Journal of Personality, 68, 1109–1126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., & Bullock, B. M. (2002). Parenting and adolescent problem behavior: An ecological analysis of the nurturance hypothesis. In J. G. Borkowski, S. L. Ramey, & M. Bristol-Power (Eds.), Parenting and the child’s world: Influences on academic, intellectual, and social–emotional development (pp. 231–249). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., Capaldi, D. M., & Yoerger, K. (1999). Late childhood antecedents to progressions in male adolescent substance use: An ecological analysis of risk and protection. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 175–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., Lochman, J. E., Harnish, J. D., Bates, J. E., & Petit, G. S. (1997). Reactive and proactive aggression in school children and psychiatrically impaired chronically assaultive youth. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 37–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, J. E., & Jessor, R. (1985). Structure of problem behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 890–904.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, J. E., Jessor, R., & Costa, F. M. (1988). Brief report: Syndrome of problem behavior in adolescence: A replication. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 56, 762–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. D., Danish, S. J., & Howard, C. W. (1992). Relationship between drug use and other problem behavior sin urban adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 705–712.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. D., Kung, E. M., White, K. S., & Valois, R. F. (2000). The structure of self-reported aggression, drug use, and delinquent behavior during early adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29, 282–293.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., & Loeber, R. (2000). Some benefits of dichotomization in psychiatric and criminological research. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 10, 100–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., & Welsh, B. C. (2006). Saving children from a life of crime: Early risk factors and effective intervention. New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, B., Soothill, K., & Fligelstone, R. (2004). Identifying patterns and pathways of offending behaviour: A new approach to typologies of crime. European Journal of Criminology, 1, 47–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frick, P. J., Lahey, B. B., Loeber, R., Tannenbaum, L. E., VanHorn, Y., Christ, M. A., et al. (1993). Oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: A meta- analytic review of factor analyses and cross-validation in a clinic sample. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 319–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, R. D., & Ellickson, P. L. (1990). How generalizable are adolescents’ beliefs about prodrug pressures and resistance self-efficacy? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 321–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: Longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. D., & O’Malley, P. M. (1985). Issues of validity and population coverage in student surveys of drug use. In B. A. Rouse, N. J. Kozel, & L. G. Richards (Eds.), Self report methods of estimating drug use: Meeting the current challenges to validity (pp. 31–54). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempes, M., Matthys, W., De Vries, H., & Van Engeland, H. (2005). reactive and proactive aggression in children: A review of theory, findings, and the relevance for child and adolescent psychiatry. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 14, 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatri, P., Kupersmidt, J. B., & Patterson, C. (2000). Aggression and peer victimization as predictors of self-reported behavioral and emotional adjustment. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 345–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim-Godwin, Y. S., Clements, C., McCuiston, A. M., & Fox, J. A. (2009). Dating violence among high school students in Southeastern North Carolina. Journal of School Nursing, 25, 141–151.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. F., Hicks, B. M., Patrick, C. J., Carlson, S. R., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. (2002). Etiologic connections among substance dependence, antisocial behavior, and personality: Modeling the externalizing spectrum. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 411–424.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kulig, K., Brener, N. D., & McManus, T. (2003). Sexual activity and substance use among adolescents by category of physical activity plus team sports participation. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 157, 905–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagana, M. T. (2004). Protective factors for inner-city adolescents at risk of school dropout: Family factors and social support. Social Work in Education, 26, 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauritsen, J. L., Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1991). The link between offending and victimization among adolescents. Criminology, 29, 265–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, M. L., & Bouthillier, C. (2003). A developmental test of the general deviance syndrome with adjudicated girls and boys using hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 13, 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, M., & Girard, S. (1997). The generality of deviance: Replication over two decades with a Canadian sample of adjudicated boys. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 39, 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, T., Henrich, C., Jones, S., & Hawley, P. (2003). Disentangling the “whys” from the “whats” of aggressive behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 122–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, M., Weaver, S. R., King, K. M., Lui, F., & Chassin, L. (2008). Historical change in the link between adolescent deviance proneness and marijuana use, 1979–2004. Prevention Science, 9, 4–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. P. (1998). Never too early, never too late: Risk factors and successful interventions for serious and violent juvenile offenders. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 7, 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Van Kammen, W. B. (1998). Antisocial behavior and mental health problems: Explanatory factors in childhood and adolescence. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R., & Lahey, B. B. (1989). Recommendations for research on disruptive behavior disorders of childhood and adolescence. In B. B. Lahey & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 221–251). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R., & Schmaling, K. B. (1985). Empirical evidence for overt and covert patterns of antisocial conduct problems: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 337–352.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, K. B., & Pittman, J. F. (1999). Adolescent prosocial values and self-efficacy in relation to delinquency, risky sexual behavior, and drug use. Youth & Society, 30, 461–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luszczynska, A., Gutierrez-Dona, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). General self efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 40, 80–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maltz, M. D. (1994). Deviating from the mean: The declining significance of significance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 434–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massoglia, M. (2006). Desistance or displacement? The changing patterns of criminal offending from adolescence to adulthood. The Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, K. A. (2002). Friends: The role of peer influence across adolescent risk behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 267–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCreary, M. L., Slavin, L. A., & Berry, E. J. (1996). Predicting problem behavior and self-esteem among African American adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11, 216–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutcheon, A. L. (1987). Latent class analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, L., & Newcomb, M. D. (1992). General deviance syndrome: Expanded hierarchical evaluations at four ages from early adolescent to adulthood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 766–776.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGloin, J. M., Sullivan, C. J., & Piquero, A. R. (2009). Aggregating to versatility? Transitions among offender types in the short-term. British Journal of Criminology, 49, 243–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1992). Factors and taxa, traits and types, differences of degree and differences in kind. Journal of Personality, 60, 117–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzler, C. W., Biglan, A., Ary, D., Noell, J., & Smolkowski, K. (1993). The relationship among high-risk sexual behavior and other adolescent problem behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17, 419–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. O. (1998–2008). MPlus technical appendices. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Muthén, B. O. (2002). Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29, 81–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. O. (2006). Should substance use disorders be considered as categorical or dimensional? Addiction, 101, 6–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (1998–2008). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Nelson, M. C., & Gordon-Larsen, P. (2006). Physical activity and sedentary behavior patterns are association with selected adolescent health risk behaviors. Pediatrics, 117, 1281–1290.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, M. D., & McGee, L. (1991). Influence of sensation seeking on general deviance and specific problem behaviors from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 614–628.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. W., Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (1988). The generality of deviance in late adolescence and early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 53, 1–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, J. A., Hawkins, J. D., & Arthur, M. W. (1999). Risk and protection: Are both necessary to understand diverse behavioral outcomes in adolescence? Social Work Research, 23, 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, C. C., & Jenson, J. M. (2003). Cluster profiles of multiple problem youth. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 230–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulin, F., & Boivin, M. (2000). Reactive and proactive aggression: Results of a two-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 12, 115–122.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Proimos, J., Durant, R. H., Pierce, J. D., & Goodman, F. (1998). Gambling and other risk behaviors among 8th–12th grade students. Pediatrics, 102, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quay, H. C. (1986). Classification. In H. C. Quay & J. S. Werry (Eds.), Psychological disorders of childhood (pp. 1–34). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, C. J., McKeown, R. E., Sargent, R. G., & Valois, R. F. (1996). Patterns of tobacco and alcohol use among sedentary, exercising, nonathletic, and athletic youth. Journal of School Health, 66, 27–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reinke, W. M., Herman, K. C., Petras, H., & Ialongo, N. S. (2008). Empirically derived subtypes of child academic and behavior problems: Co-occurrence and distal outcomes. Journal of Abnormal Clinical Psychology, 36, 759–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reise, S. P., & Gomel, J. N. (1995). Modeling qualitative variation within latent trait dimensions: Application of mixed-measurement to personality assessment. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 341–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, M. H., Miller, B. V., & O’Donnell, P. C. (2004). Parental monitoring mediates the effects of age and sex on problem behaviors among African American urban young adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. A., Thomas, C. B., St. Lawrence, J., & Pack, R. (2005). Predictors of infection with Chlamydia or Gonorrhea in incarcerated adolescents. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 32, 115–122.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schreck, C., Stewart, E., & Osgood, D. W. (2008). A reappraisal of the overlap of violent offenders and victims. Criminology, 46, 871–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). General self efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio (pp. 35–37). Windsor, UK: NFer-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shader, M. (2001). Risk factors for delinquency: An overview. Washington, D.C.: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, J., Farrington, D. P., & Potts, J. (2004). Impact of antisocial lifestyle on health. Journal of Public Health, 26, 347–352.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, J. G., Raj, A., Mucci, L. A., & Hathaway, J. E. (2001). Dating violence against adolescent girls and associated substance use, unhealthy weight control, sexual risk behavior, pregnancy, and suicidality. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286, 572–579.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (1987). Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 438–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C. J. (2006). Early adolescent delinquency: Assessing the role of childhood problems, family environment, and peer pressure. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T. N., Farrell, A. D., & Kliewer, W. (2006). Peer victimization in early adolescence: Association between physical and relational victimization and drug use, aggression, and delinquent behaviors among urban middle school students. Development and Psychopathology, 18, 119–137.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tubman, J. G., Gil, A. G., Wagner, E. E., & Artigues, H. (2003). Patterns of sexual risk behaviors and psychiatric disorders in a community sample of young adults. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 26, 473–500.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2002). Latent class analysis. In M. Lewis-Beck, A. E. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods (pp. 549–553). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Eye, A., & Bergman, L. R. (2003). Research strategies in developmental psychopathology: Dimensional identity and the person-oriented approach. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 553–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, T. J. (2001). Delinquency and health among adolescents: Multiple outcomes of a similar social and structural process. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 24, 447–647.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, J. A., Howard-Barr, E. M., Moore, E. M., & Werch, C. C. (2006). The mediating role of adolescent self-efficacy in the relationship between parental practices and adolescent alcohol use. Journal of Adolescent Health Care, 38, 448–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, M. D., Pentz, M. A., Skara, S. N., Li, C., Chou, C., & Dwyer, J. H. (2003). Relationship of substance use and association predictors of violence in early, middle, and late adolescence. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Use, 13, 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., & Hoffman, J. H. (2004). Gambling, substance use, and other problem behaviors among youth: A test of general deviance models. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. R. (1992). Early problem behaviors and later drug problems. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 29, 412–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windle, M. (1992). Temperament and social support in adolescence: Interrelations with depressive symptoms and delinquent behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, K. C., Stinchfield, R. D., Botzet, A., & Anderson, N. (2002). A prospective study of youth gambling behaviors. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 3–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. Sullivan.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6.

Table 6 Descriptives for key study variables

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sullivan, C.J., Childs, K.K. & O’Connell, D. Adolescent Risk Behavior Subgroups: An Empirical Assessment. J Youth Adolescence 39, 541–562 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9445-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9445-5

Keywords

Navigation