Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Learning Chemistry: Self-Efficacy, Chemical Understanding, and Graphing Skills

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chemistry curriculum should account for learning in context and understanding chemistry at the macroscopic and microscopic levels: the symbol level and the process level. The Taste of Chemistry learning module, developed for high school chemistry majors (students who choose to study the advanced chemistry program in high school), focuses on food-related chemistry, emphasizes learning in context and chemical understanding, and promotes the use of graphing skills. While learning, students are exposed to metacognitive prompts related to the four chemistry-understanding levels and to graphing skills. The objectives were to investigate (a) learning chemistry in context with metacognitive and graphing prompts as it relates to three students learning outcomes: self-efficacy, chemical understanding, and graphing skills and (b) the teachers’ role in promoting these learning outcomes. Research participants included two experimental groups and one comparison group (N = 370). The first experimental group studied the module, while being exposed to the metacognitive prompts via the module and explicit metacognitive instruction from their teachers. The second experimental group studied the module with the prompts embedded in it, but without explicit metacognitive instruction from their teachers. In the comparison group, students learned topics of organic chemistry and biochemistry, which was part of the traditional syllabus.

The experimental students’ self-efficacy, chemical understanding, and graphing skills improved; the net-gains were significantly higher than that of the comparison group. These gains were due to learning in context with the metacognitive prompts. Teachers were instrumental in promoting students’ application of metacognition. This research contributes to the body of knowledge of metacognition and chemical understanding as it bridges the two domains using metacognitive prompts related to the four chemistry-understanding levels and to graphing skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2007). Predators of knowledge construction: interpreting students’ metacognition in an amusement park physics program. Sci Educ, 91(2), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avargil, S., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). Teaching thinking skills in context-based learning: teachers’ challenges and assessment knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(2), 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avargil, S., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2013). Challenges in the transition to large-scale reform in chemical education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avargil, S., Lavi, R., & Dori, Y. J. (2018). Students’ metacognition and metacognitive strategies in science education. In: Y. Dori, Z. Mevarech, & D. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education. Innovations in science education and technology (vol. 24). Cham: Springer.

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol, 37(2), 122–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. J Soc Clin Psychol, 4(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnea, N., Dori, Y. J., & Hofstein, A. (2010). Development and implementation of inquiry-based and computerized-based laboratories: reforming high school chemistry in Israel. Chem Educ Res Pract, 11(3), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1039/C005471M.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casselman, B. L., & Atwood, C. H. (2017). Improving general chemistry course performance through online homework-based metacognitive training. J Chem Educ, 94(12), 1811–1821. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, J., & Linn, M. C. (2012). The role of self-monitoring in learning chemistry with dynamic visualizations. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education (pp. 133–163). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, J., & Linn, M. C. (2014). Supporting knowledge integration in chemistry with a visualization-enhanced inquiry unit. J Sci Educ Technol, 23(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9449-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. M., & Sandi-Urena, S. (2009). Design and validation of an instrument to assess metacognitive skillfulness in chemistry problem solving. J Chem Educ, 86(2), 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. M., Sandi-Urena, S., & Stevens, R. (2008). Reliable multi method assessment of metacognition use in chemistry problem solving. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 9(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1039/B801287N.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, O., & Taber, K. S. (2015). The many faces of high school chemistry. In Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 457–480). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dori, Y. J., & Hameiri, M. (2003). Multidimensional analysis system for quantitative chemistry problems: symbol, macro, micro, and process aspects. J Res Sci Teach, 40(3), 278–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dori, Y. J., & Sasson, I. (2008). Chemical understanding and graphing skills in an honors case-based computerized chemistry laboratory environment: the value of bidirectional visual and textual representations. J Res Sci Teach, 45(2), 219–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilks, I., Rauch, F., Ralle, B., & Hofstein, A. (2013). How to allocate the chemistry curriculum between science and society. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Teaching chemistry—a studybook (pp. 1–36). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: SensePublishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, B., Phillips, M. M., & Barbera, J. (2016). Connecting achievement motivation to performance in general chemistry. Chem Educ Res Pract, 17(4), 1054–1066. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00148C.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, UK: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. Am Psychol, 341, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, D. (1998). The com plexity of chemistry and implications for teaching. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 233–248). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2009). Introduction: macro, submicro and symbolic representations and the relationship between them: Key models in chemical education. In J. K. Gilbert & D. F. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple representations in chemical education (pp. 1–8). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8_1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. B. (1992). Self-efficacy: a theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Acad Manag Rev, 17(2), 183–211. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1992.4279530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herscovitz, O., Kaberman, Z., Saar, L., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). The relationship between metacognition and the ability to pose questions in chemical education. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education (Vol. 40, pp. 165–195). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2132-6.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education—a pedagogical justification and the state-of-the-art in Israel, Germany, and the USA. Int J Sci Math Educ, 9(6), 1459–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9273-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2007). The laboratory in science education: the state of the art. Chem Educ Res Pract, 8(2), 105–107. https://doi.org/10.1039/B7RP90003A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students’ ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. J Res Sci Teach, 42(7), 791–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. J Comput Assist Learn, 7(2), 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaberman, Z., & Dori, Y. J. (2008). Metacognition in chemical education: question posing in the case-based computerized learning environment. Instr Sci, 37(5), 403–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9054-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, M., & Hofstein, A. (2008). The inquiry laboratory as a source for development of metacognitive skills. Int J Sci Math Educ, 6(3), 601–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9066-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (2005). Students becoming chemists: developing representational competence. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (pp. 121–145). Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J., McNeill, K. L., & Reiser, B. J. (2008). Learning-goals-driven design model: developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy. Sci Educ, 92(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: the effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. Am Educ Res J, 40(1), 281–310. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040001281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbrink, E. a., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs Instudent engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2009). Promoting scientific literacy using a sociocritical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching: concept, examples, experiences. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 231–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2006). The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy. Metacognition and Learning, 1(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-006-9595-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRC. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.

  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Rev Educ Res, 66(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: a path analysis. J Educ Psychol, 86(2), 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pazicni, S., & Bauer, C. F. (2014). Characterizing illusions of competence in introductory chemistry students. Chemical Education Research and Pracice, 15(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00106G.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. M., & Norris, S. P. (2009). Bridging the gap between the language of science and the language of school science through the use of adapted primary literature. Res Sci Educ, 39(3), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9111-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. A. (2007). Chemical nanotechnology: a liberal arts approach to a basic course in emerging interdisciplinary science and technology. J Chem Educ, 84(2), 259. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed084p259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potgieter, M., Harding, A., & Engelbrecht, J. (2008). Transfer of algebraic and graphical thinking between mathematics and chemistry. J Res Sci Teach, 45(2), 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D. W., Lucas, K. B., & McRobbie, C. J. (2003). The role of the microcomputer-based laboratory display in supporting the construction of new understandings in kinematics. Res Sci Educ, 33(2), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025073410522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1987). Transfer of cognitive skills from programming: when and how? J Educ Comput Res, 3(2), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.2190/6F4Q-7861-QWA5-8PL1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandi-Urena, S., Cooper, M. M., & Stevens, R. H. (2011). Enhancement of metacognition use and awareness by means of a collaborative intervention. Int J Sci Educ, 33(3), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903452922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Res Sci Educ, 36(1–2), 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2005). The importance of involving high-school chemistry teachers in the process of defining the operational meaning of ‘chemical literacy’. Int J Sci Educ, 27(3), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000266191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2008). Towards a curricular model of the nature of science. Science and Education, 17(2–3), 179–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9056-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2013). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp00012e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, P. (1991). Factors associated with the acquisition of functional knowledge and understanding of science. Res Sci Technol Educ, 9(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514910090103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, P. (1999). Self-assessment: the use of self-report knowledge and opportunity to learn inventories. Int J Sci Educ, 21(4), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. P. (2013). Changing the metacognitive orientation of a classroom environment to stimulate metacognitive reflection regarding the nature of physics learning. Int J Sci Educ, 35(7), 1183–1207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.778438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. P., Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2008, October 17). Development of an instrument designed to investigate elements of science students’ metacognition, self-efficacy and learning processes: the SEMLI-S. Int J Sci Educ, 30(13), 1701–1724. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701482493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol, 56(3), 407–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H.-K., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Inscriptional practices in two inquiry-based classrooms: a case study of seventh graders’ use of data tables and graphs. J Res Sci Teach, 43(1), 63–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W.-X., Hsu, Y.-S., Wang, C.-Y., & Ho, Y.-T. (2015). Exploring the impacts of cognitive and metacognitive prompting on students’ scientific inquiry practices within an E-learning environment. Int J Sci Educ, 37(3), 529–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.996796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. J Educ Psychol, 82(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education in Science and Technology, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Kiryat HaTechnion, 3200003, Haifa, Israel

    Shirly Avargil

Authors
  1. Shirly Avargil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shirly Avargil.

Ethics declarations

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

“This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.”

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 17 kb)

ESM 2

(DOC 49 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 128 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avargil, S. Learning Chemistry: Self-Efficacy, Chemical Understanding, and Graphing Skills. J Sci Educ Technol 28, 285–298 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9765-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9765-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation