Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Eliciting Metacognitive Experiences and Reflection in a Year 11 Chemistry Classroom: An Activity Theory Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concerns regarding students’ learning and reasoning in chemistry classrooms are well documented. Students’ reasoning in chemistry should be characterized by conscious consideration of chemical phenomenon from laboratory work at macroscopic, molecular/sub-micro and symbolic levels. Further, students should develop metacognition in relation to such ways of reasoning about chemistry phenomena. Classroom change eliciting metacognitive experiences and metacognitive reflection is necessary to shift entrenched views of teaching and learning in students. In this study, Activity Theory is used as the framework for interpreting changes to the rules/customs and tools of the activity systems of two different classes of students taught by the same teacher, Frances, who was teaching chemical equilibrium to those classes in consecutive years. An interpretive methodology involving multiple data sources was employed. Frances explicitly changed her pedagogy in the second year to direct students attention to increasingly consider chemical phenomena at the molecular/sub-micro level. Additionally, she asked students not to use the textbook until toward the end of the equilibrium unit and sought to engage them in using their prior knowledge of chemistry to understand their observations from experiments. Frances’ changed pedagogy elicited metacognitive experiences and reflection in students and challenged them to reconsider their metacognitive beliefs about learning chemistry and how it might be achieved. While teacher change is essential for science education reform, students are not passive players in change efforts and they need to be convinced of the viability of teacher pedagogical change in the context of their goals, intentions, and beliefs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baird JR, Fensham PJ, Gunstone RF, White RT (1991) The importance of reflection in improving science teaching and learning. J Res Sci Teach 28:163–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab SA, Barnett M, Yamagata-Lynch L, Squire K, Keating T (2002) Using activity theory to understand the contradictions characterizing a technology-rich introductory astronomy course. Mind Cult Activ 9:76–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case J, Gunstone RF, Lewis A (2001) Students’ metacognitive development in an innovative second year chemical education course. Res Sci Educ 31:331–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole M, Engeström Y (1993) A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In: Salomon G (ed) Distributed cognitions: psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll RK, Taylor TGN (2001) Using constructivism to inform tertiary chemistry pedagogy. Chem Educ Res Pract Eur 2:215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa V (1997) How teacher and students ‘study all that matters’ in high school chemistry. Int J Sci Educ 19:1005–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidowitz B, Rollnick M (2003) Enabling metacognition is the laboratory: a case study of four second year chemistry students. Res Sci Educ 33:43–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK (1989) Interpretive interactionism. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver R, Asoko H, Leach J, Mortimer E, Scott P (1994) Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educ Res 23:5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl R (1994) Research on history and philosophy of science. In: Gabel D (ed) Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. Macmillan, New York, pp 442–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Efklides A (2006) Metacognition and affect: what can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educ Res Rev 1:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström Y (1987) Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit Oy, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström Y (2009) The future of activity theory: a rough draft. In: Sannino A, Daniels H, Gutiérrez KD (eds) Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 319–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson F (2012) Qualitative research methods for science education. In: Fraser BJ, Tobin KG, McRobbie CJ (eds) Second international handbook of science education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1451–1469

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer PA, Newby TJ (1996) The expert learner: strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instr Sci 24:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell JH (1976) Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In: Resnick LB (ed) The nature of intelligence. Wiley, Hillsdale, pp 231–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell JH (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. Am Psychol 34:906–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabel D (1998) The complexity of chemistry and its implications for teaching. In: Fraser BJ, Tobin KG (eds) International handbook of science education. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 233–248

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz C (1973) The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert JK, Treagust DF (2006) Introduction: macro, submicro and symbolic representations and the relationship between them: key models in chemical education. In: Gilbert JK, Treagust D (eds) Multiple representations in chemical education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert JK, Justi R, van Driel JH, de Jong O, Treagust DF (2004) Securing a future for chemical education. Chem Educ Res Pract 5:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser R (1984) Education and thinking: the role of knowledge. Am Psychol 39:93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1989) Fourth generation evaluation. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1997) Naturalistic and rationalistic enquiry. In: Keeves JP (ed) Educational research, methodology, and measurement: an international handbook, 2nd edn. Elsevier, London, pp 86–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone RF (1994) The importance of of specific science content in the enhancement of metacognition. In: Fensham PJ, Gunstone RF, White RT (eds) The content of science: a constructivist approach to its learning and teaching. Falmer Press, London, pp 131–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson D (1990) A critical look at practical work in school science. Sch Sci Rev 70:33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein A, Lunetta VN (2003) The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Sci Educ 88:28–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonasson DH (2000) Revisiting activity theory as a framework for designing student-centred learning environments. In: Jonasson DH, Land SM (eds) Theoretical foundations of leaning environments. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 89–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn D, Amsel E, O’Loughlin M (1998) The development of scientific thinking skills. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewthwaite B, Wiebe R (2011) Fostering teacher development to a tetrahedral orientation in the teaching of chemistry. Res Sci Educ 41:667–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunetta VN (1998) The school science laboratory: historical perspectives and contexts for contemporary teaching. In: Fraser BJ, Tobin K (eds) International handbook of science education. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 249–262

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mahaffy P (2004) The future shape of chemistry education. Chem Educ Res Pract Eur 5:229–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathison S (1988) Why triangulate? Educ Res 17(2):13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews MR (1993) Constructivism and science education: some epistemological problems. J Sci Educ Technol 2:359–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie CJ, Thomas GP (2000) Epistemological and contextual issues in the use of microcomputer-based laboratories in a year 11 chemistry classroom. J Comput Math Sci Teach 19:137–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar R (1989) Constructive criticisms. Int J Sci Educ 11:587–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2006) America’s lab report: investigations in high school science. Committee on high school science laboratories. The National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne J (2012) The role of argument: learning how to learn in school science. In: Fraser BJ et al (eds) Second international handbook of science education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 833–949

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris SG, Winograd P (1990) How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction? In: Jones BF, Idol L (eds) Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 15–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich PR, Marx RW, Boyle RA (1993) Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Rev Educ Res 63:167–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickey D, Stacy AM (2000) The role of metacognition in learning chemistry. J Chem Educ 74:915–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff B, Matusov E, White C (1996) Models of learning in a community of learners. In: Olson DR, Torrance N (eds) Handbook of education and human development: new models of learning, teaching, and schooling. Basil Blackwell, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth W-M, Tobin K (2002) Redesigning an ‘urban’ teacher education program: an activity theory perspective. Mind Cult Activ 9:108–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson V, Clark DB (2008) Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Sci Educ 92:447–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw G, Crippen KJ, Hartley KD (2006) Promoting self-regulation in science education: metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Res Sci Educ 36:111–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas GP (1999) Student restraints to reform: conceptual change issues in enhancing students’ learning processes. Res Sci Educ 29:89–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas GP (2002) The social mediation of metacognition. In: McInerney D, Van Etten S (eds) Sociocultural influences on motivation and learning. Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning, vol 2. Information Age, Greenwich, pp 225–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas GP (2006) An investigation of the metacognitive orientation of Confucian-heritage culture and non-Confucian heritage culture science classroom learning environments in Hong Kong. Res Sci Educ 36(1–2):85–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas GP (2012) Metacognition in science education: past, present and future considerations. In: Fraser BJ, Tobin KG, McRobbie CJ (eds) Second international handbook of science education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 131–144

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas GP, McRobbie CJ (2001) Using a metaphor for learning to improve students’ metacognition in the chemistry classroom. J Res Sci Teach 38:222–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenman M (2006) Metacognition and learning: methodological and conceptual issues. Metacogn Learn 1:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman H (1985) The origins of metacognition. In: Forrest-Pressley DL, MacKinnon GE, Waller TG (eds) Metacognition, cognition and human performance, vol 1. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • White RT (1998) Decisions and problems in research on metacognition. In: Fraser BJ, Tobin KG (eds) International handbook of science education. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1207–1212

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

    Gregory P. Thomas

  2. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Campbell J. McRobbie

Authors
  1. Gregory P. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Campbell J. McRobbie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory P. Thomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, G.P., McRobbie, C.J. Eliciting Metacognitive Experiences and Reflection in a Year 11 Chemistry Classroom: An Activity Theory Perspective. J Sci Educ Technol 22, 300–313 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9394-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9394-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation