Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the Role of Different Levels of Religiousness and Spirituality in Controversial Ethical Issues and Clinical Practice among Brazilian Resident Physicians: Results from the Multicenter SBRAMER Study

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compares clinical practice and objections to controversial ethical issues among 836 Brazilian resident physicians according to levels of religiousness/spirituality. Residents with low religiousness/spirituality (s/r) believed less in the influence of spirituality on clinical practice, were less comfortable addressing this issue, tended to listen less carefully and try to change the subject more than other groups. Residents with high spirituality and low religiousness (S/r) inquired more about religious/spiritual issues, while those with high religiousness/spirituality (S/R) were more supportive and reported fewer barriers to addressing these issues. Concerning ethical issues (e.g., physician-assisted suicide, withdrawal of life support, abortion), S/R had more objections than others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the following SBRAMER collaborators: Alana Ripardo Rodrigues; Ana Helena Ferreira da Silva; Barbara Leni Troncoso Justo; Bernardo Gomes Muffato; Bianca Penner Oliveira de Paula; Bianca Veloso Vitalino; Brysa Paiva Cruz; Carlos Roberto Figueiredo Coelho; Clariana Contarini Souza; Edimilson José Correia Júnior; Filipe Rodrigues do Nascimento; Glauber Artur Amaral Diniz; Guilherme Gomide Almeida; Ivo Bittecourt Ferreira; João Victor de Andrade Águas; Julia Azevedo da Silva; Loyná Euá Flores E Paez; Lucas Henrique Rodrigues da Silva; Maria Laura Alcântara; Maria Lua Marques de Mendonça; Mayara de Lima Moreira; Ramiro Cavedon Nunes; and Thais Stephanie.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors’ individual contributions are outlined as follows. APSLV, ALGL, APRC, SRSSC, LMG, EHM, ACSC, RLCT, OSE and GL were responsible for conceptualization and investigation. APSLV, APRC, SRSSC, LMG, EHM, ACSC and RLCT curated the data. ALGL and GL carried out formal analysis and wrote the original draft. ALGL, APRC, SRSSC, LMG, EHM, ACSC, RLCT, OSE and GL wrote, edited and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giancarlo Lucchetti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

The project was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora under permit number CAAE 57905716.4.1001.5133 and by the other participating centers. All residents included in the study signed an Informed Consent Form.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vasconcelos, A.P.S.L., Lucchetti, A.L.G., Cavalcanti, A.P.R. et al. Comparison of the Role of Different Levels of Religiousness and Spirituality in Controversial Ethical Issues and Clinical Practice among Brazilian Resident Physicians: Results from the Multicenter SBRAMER Study. J Relig Health 63, 1268–1284 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01702-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01702-6

Keywords

Navigation