Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Morpheme Transposition of Two-Character Chinese Words in Vertical Visual Fields

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study explored the morpheme transposition process of two-character Chinese words in the upper and lower visual fields by adopting a dual-target rapid serial visual presentation paradigm. The results showed that the identification accuracy of canonical words was better in the lower visual field, whereas the accuracy of transposed words was almost identical in the upper and lower visual fields. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between canonical and transposed words at 0°, 2°, 4°, and 6° eccentricities in the upper visual field. However, the accuracy of canonical words was markedly higher than that of transposed words at 2°, 4°, and 6° eccentricities in the lower visual field. Finally, the character order errors mainly occurred at 0°eccentricity with a duration of 100 ms in vertical visual fields. These findings, taken together, indicated that the character transposition affected the lexical process of two-character Chinese words in the lower visual field but not in the upper visual field, and the character order of words was more likely to be reversed at 0° eccentricity and the initial stage of visual word processing in vertical reading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, P. A., & Emerson, P. L. (1991). Holism revisited: Evidence for parallel independent word-level and letter-level processors during word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17(2), 489–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, P. A., Wallace, B., & Weber, T. A. (1995). Influence of case type, word frequency, and exposure duration on visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(4), 914–934.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, D. A. (1968). Phenomenal simultaneity and the perceptual moment hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology., 59(4), 395–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, MD (2002) Reading vertical text: Rotated vsersus marquee. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting SAGE Publications, 46(17), 1633–1635.

  • Calvo, M. G. (2006). Processing of emotional visual scenes outside the focus of spatial attention: The role of eccentricity. Visual Cognition, 13(6), 666–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, H., Gao, M., & Yan, H. (2016a). Character decomposition and transposition processes in Chinese compound words modulates attentional blink. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 923.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, H. W., Yang, K. F., & Yan, H. M. (2016b). Character decomposition and transposition of Chinese compound words in the right and left visual fields. i-Perception, 7(6), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L. K., & Carr, H. A. (1926). The ability of Chinese students to read in vertical and horizontal directions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 9(2), 110–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109–127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Danckert, J., & Goodale, M. A. (2001). Superior performance for visually guided pointing in the lower visual field. Experimental Brain Research, 137(3–4), 303–308.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darker, I. T., & Jordan, T. R. (2004). Perception of words and non-words in the upper and lower visual fields. Brain and language, 89(3), 593–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological review, 117(3), 713–758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2003). “Aoccdrnig to a Rscheearch.” Personal Web Page via the Cognition & Brain Sciences Institute, University of Cambridge. Retrieved from http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/matt.davis/Cmabrigde/.

  • Goldstein, A., & Babkoff, H. (2001). A comparison of upper versus lower and right versus left visual fields using lexical decision. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(4), 1239–1259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, J., & Li, X. (2015). The effects of character transposition within and across words in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(1), 272–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagenbeek, R. E., & Van Strien, J. W. (2002). Left–right and upper–lower visual field asymmetries for face matching, letter naming, and lexical decision. Brain and Cognition, 49(1), 34–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intriligator, J. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature, 383, 334–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huey, E. B. (1898). Preliminary experiments in the physiology and psychology of reading. The American Journal of Psychology, 9(4), 575–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhoff, A. W. (1990). Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: The role of letter and word units. Acta Psychologica, 73(3), 281–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inhoff, A. W., & Briihl, D. (1991). Semantic processing of unattended text during selective reading: How the eyes see it. Perception Psychophysics, 49(3), 289–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Language Teaching and Research. (1986). Modern Chinese frequency dictionary. Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. L., & Dunne, M. D. (2012). Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: Evidence against parafoveal lexical activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 191–212.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. L., & Eisler, M. E. (2012). The importance of the first and last letter in words during sentence reading. Acta Psychologica, 141, 336–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 209–229.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. A., & Lawrence, G. P. (2005). Differences in visuomotor control between the upper and lower visual fields. Experimental brain research, 164(3), 395–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., & Norman, J. (1984). What is rotated in mental rotation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(3), 421–434.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., & Norman, J. (1985). Reading rotated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(4), 490–508.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., & Norman, J. (1989). Why is word recognition impaired by disorientation while the identification of single letters is not? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(1), 153–163.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsson, Á., & Sigurdardottir, H. M. (2008). On the benefits of transient attention across the visual field. Perception, 37(5), 747–764.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. W., Legge, G. E., & Ortiz, A. (2003). Is word recognition different in central and peripheral vision? Vision Research, 43(26), 2837–2846.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legge, G. E., Klitz, T. S., & Tjan, B. S. (1997). Mr. Chips: An ideal-observer model of reading. Psychological review, 104(3), 524–553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legge, G. E., Mansfield, J. S., & Chung, S. T. (2001). Psychophysics of reading: XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 41(6), 725–743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. W., & McAnany, J. J. (2005). The relative capabilities of the upper and lower visual hemifields. Vision Research, 45(21), 2820–2830.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, M., & Forgays, D. G. (1952). Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43(1), 43–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miwa, K., & Dijkstra, T. (2017). Lexical processes in the recognition of Japanese horizontal and vertical compounds. Reading and Writing, 30(4), 791–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oda K, Fujita C, Mansfield JS, & Legge GE (1999) Does vertical text orientation benefit Japanese reading. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Convention of the Japanese Association for Rehabilitation of the Visually Impaired, 97–100.

  • Pelli, D. G. (1997). The video toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 97–120). NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollatsek, A., Raney, G. E., Lagasse, L., & Rayner, K. (1993). The use of information below fixation in reading and in visual search. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(2), 179–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, M. C. (1984). Rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP): A method for studying language processing. New Methods In Reading Comprehension Research, 118, 91–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W. (1984). Attention and sensitivity in visual search. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 45(4), 355–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quek, G. L., & Finkbeiner, M. (2014). Face-sex categorization is better above fixation than below: Evidence from the reach-to-touch paradigm. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(4), 1407–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quek, G. L., & Finkbeiner, M. (2016). The upper-hemifield advantage for masked face processing: Not just an attentional bias. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(1), 52–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance., 18, 849–860.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., White, S. J., Johnson, R. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2006). Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: There is a cost. Psychological Science, 17, 192–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T. (1964). The detection of change and the perceptual moment hypothesis. British Journal of Statistical Psychology., 17(2), 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, A., Legge, G. E., Wagoner, G. H., & Yu, D. (2014). Learning to read vertical text in peripheral vision. Optometry and vision science: official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 91(9), 1097–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanRullen, R., & Koch, C. (2003). Is perception discrete or continuous? Trends in Cognitive Science., 7(5), 207–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, S. J., Johnson, R. L., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2008). Eye movements when reading transposed text: The importance of word beginning letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1261–1276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Witzel, N., Qiao, X., & Forster, K. (2011). Transposed letter priming with horizontal and vertical text in Japanese and English readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(3), 914–920.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wyble, B., Bowman, H., & Nieuwenstein, M. (2009). The attentional blink provides episodic distinctiveness: Sparing at a cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(3), 787–807.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D., Cheung, S. H., Legge, G. E., & Chung, S. T. (2007). Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed. Journal of Vision, 7(2), 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D., Park, H., Gerold, D., & Legge, G. E. (2010). Comparing reading speed for horizontal and vertical English text. Journal of vision, 10(2), 1–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant number 31700937, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant No 2019CDJSK04PT26, and the Graduate Scientific Research and Innovation Foundation of Chongqing under Grant numbers CYB20048, CYS20044.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center for Language, Cognition and Language Application, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

    Hong-Wen Cao

  2. Centre for Studies of Translation, Interpreting and Cognition, University of Macau, Macao, China

    Hong-Wen Cao

  3. Foreign Language Department, Teaching Center for General Courses, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China

    Cheng Chen

  4. Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

    Hong-Mei Yan

Authors
  1. Hong-Wen Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cheng Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hong-Mei Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong-Wen Cao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 List of the word pairs
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, HW., Chen, C. & Yan, HM. Morpheme Transposition of Two-Character Chinese Words in Vertical Visual Fields. J Psycholinguist Res 50, 815–830 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09748-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09748-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation