Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing Transition-Edge Sensor Response Times in a Modified Contact Scheme with Different Support Beams

  • Published:
Journal of Low Temperature Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present measurements of the thermal conductance, G, and effective time constants, \(\tau \), of three transition-edge sensors (TESs) populated in arrays operated from 80–87 mK with T\(_\mathrm{C}\) \(\sim \) 120 mK. Our TES arrays include several variations of thermal architecture enabling determination of the architecture that demonstrates the minimum noise equivalent power, the lowest \(\tau \), and the trade-offs among designs. The three TESs we report here have identical Mo/Cu bilayer thermistors and wiring structures, while the thermal architectures are: (1) a TES with straight support beams of 1 mm length, (2) a TES with meander support beams of total length 2 mm and with two phonon-filter blocks per beam, and (3) a TES with meander support beams of total length 2 mm and with six phonon-filter blocks per beam. Our wiring scheme aims to lower the thermistor normal state resistance R\(_{N}\) and increase the sharpness of the transition \(\alpha =\) dlogR/dlogT at the transition temperature T\(_\mathrm{C}\). We find an upper limit of \(\alpha \) given by (\(25\pm 10\)), and G values of 200 fW/K for (1), 15 fW/K for (2), and 10 fW/K for (3). The value of \(\alpha \) can be improved by slightly increasing the length of our thermistors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.D. Beyer, P.M. Echternach, M.E. Kenyon, M.C. Runyan, B. Bumble, C.M. Bradford, J.J. Bock, W.A. Holmes, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 23, 2100104 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J.E. Sadleir, S.J. Smith, S.R. Bandler, J.A. Chervenak, J.R. Clem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 047003 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. J.E. Sadleir, S.J. Smith, I.K. Robinson, F.M. Finkbeiner, J.A. Chervenak, S.R. Bandler, M.E. Eckart, C.A. Kilbourne, Phys. Rev. B 84, 184502 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. J.C. Mather, Appl. Opt. 21, 1125 (1982)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. A.D. Beyer, M.E. Kenyon, P.M. Echternach, B.-H. Eom, J. Bueno, P.K. Day, J.J. Bock, C.M. Bradford, Proc. SPIE 7741, 774121 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K.D. Irwin, G.C. Hilton, Top. Appl. Phys. 99, 63 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.A. Bennett, D.S. Swetz, D.R. Schmidt, J.N. Ullom, Phys. Rev. B 87, 020508 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. D. Beyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beyer, A.D., Kenyon, M.E., Bumble, B. et al. Comparing Transition-Edge Sensor Response Times in a Modified Contact Scheme with Different Support Beams. J Low Temp Phys 176, 299–303 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-013-1027-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-013-1027-y

Keywords