Skip to main content
Log in

Navigation by Male Crab Spiders Misumenoides formosipes (Araneae: Thomisidae): Floral Cues May Aid in Locating Potential Mates

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The crab spider Misumenoides formosipes is an ambush predator whose males search for relatively sedentary females within a heterogeneous habitat. Females are receptive to mating immediately after their adult molt and a male biased adult sex ratio together with precopulatory guarding places a premium on male ability to locate females quickly. It is unknown what cues males use to find females; we report here on male movements in association with floral cues. Males in field trials moved towards inflorescences more frequently when both visual and chemical cues were available, than when chemical cues were eliminated. Males in lab trials chose an inflorescence over leaf substrates even in the absence of visual cues. These findings support the hypothesis that M. formosipes males could utilize floral chemistry as a navigational cue in mate searches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich JR, Barros TM (1995) Chemical attraction of male crab spiders (Araneae: Thomisidae) and kleptoparasitic flies (Diptera, Milichiidae, and Chloropidae). J Arachnol 23:212–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JT, Morse DH (2001) Pick-up lines: cues used by male crab spiders to find reproductive females. Behav Ecol 12:360–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austad SN (1984) Evolution of sperm priority patterns in spiders. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic, New York, pp 223–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG (2002) A spider’s world: senses and behavior. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG, Schmitt A (1991) Species recognition and species isolation in wandering spiders (Cupiennius spp.; Ctenidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck MW, Connor EF (1992) Factors affecting the reproductive success of the crab spider Misumenoides formosipes: the covariance between juvenile and adult traits. Oecologia 92:287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien SA, Morse DH (1998) The role of prey and flower quality in the choice of hunting sites by adult male crab spiders Misumena vatia. J Arachnol 26:238–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Coddington JA (2005) Phylogeny and classification of spiders. In Ubick D, Paquin P, Cushing PE, Roth V (eds) Spiders of North America: an identification manual. American Arachnological Society, pp 18–24

  • Dodson GN, Beck MW (1993) Pre-copulatory guarding of penultimate females by male crab spiders, Misumenoides formosipes. Anim Behav 46:951–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Montraveta C, Ruano-Bellido J (2000) Female silk and mate attraction in a burrowing wolf-spider (Araneae: Lycosidae). Bull Br Arachnol Soc 11:361–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Montraveta C, Cuadrado M (2009) Mate attraction in a burrowing wolf-spider (Araneae, Lycosidae) is not olfactory mediated. Ethology 115:375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskett AC (2007) Spider sex pheromones: emission, reception, structures, and functions. Biol Rev 82:27–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greco CF, Kevan PG (1994) Contrasting patch choosing by anthophilous predators: vegetation and floral cues for decisions by a crab spider (Misumena vatia) and males and females of an ambush bug (Phymata americana). Can J Zool 72:1583–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiling AM, Herberstein ME (2004) Floral quality signals lure pollinators and their predators. Annales Zoologici Fennici 41:421–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiling AM, Cheng K, Herberstein ME (2004) Exploitation of floral signals by crab spiders (Thomisus spectabilis). Behav Ecol 15:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiling AM, Chittka L, Cheng K, Herberstein ME (2005) Colouration in crab spiders: substrate choice and prey attraction. J Exp Biol 208:1785–1792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoefler CD, Jakob EM (2006) Jumping spiders in space: movement patterns, nest site fidelity and the use of beacons. Anim Behav 71:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kevan PG, Greco CF (2001) Contrasting patch choice behaviour by immature ambush predators, a spider (Misumena vatia) and an insect (Phymata americana). Ecol Entomol 26:148–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krell FT, Krämer F (1998) Chemical attraction of crab spiders (Araneae: Thomisidae) to a flower fragrance component. J Arachnol 26:117–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Land MF (1985) The morphology and optics of spider eyes. In: Barth FG (ed) Neurobiology of arachnids. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 53–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse DH (1988) Cues associated with patch-choice decisions by foraging crab spiders Misumena vatia. Behaviour 107:297–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse DH (1993) Choosing hunting sites with little information: patch choice responses of crab spiders to distant cues. Behav Ecol 4:61–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse DH, Fritz RS (1982) Experimental and observational studies of patch choice at different scales by the crab spider Misumena vatia. Ecology 63:172–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse DH, Fritz RS (1987) The consequences of foraging for reproductive success. In: Kamil AC, Krebs J, Pulliam HR (eds) Foraging behavior. Plenum, New York, pp 443–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse DH, Stephens EG (1996) The consequences of adult foraging success on the components of lifetime fitness in a semelparous, sit and wait predator. Evol Ecol 10:361–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard SD, Beck MW, Dodson GN (1995) Why do male crab spiders drink nectar? Anim Behav 49:1443–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:523–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robakiewicz P, Daigle W (2004) Patch quality and foraging time in the crab spider Misumenops asperatus Hentz (Araneae: Thomisidae). Northeast Nat 11:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JA, Uetz GW (2005) Information content of female chemical signals in the wolf spider, Schizocosa ocreata: male discrimination of reproductive state and receptivity. Anim Behav 70:217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy LE, Rypstra AL, Persons MH (1999) Airborne chemical communication in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina. J Chem Ecol 25:2527–2533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PW (1998) Dragline-mediated mate-searching in Trite planiceps (Araneae: Salticidae). J Arachnol 26:330–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietjen WJ (1977) Dragline-following my male lycosid spiders. Psyche 84:165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wignall AE, Heiling AM, Cheng K, Herberstein ME (2006) Flower symmetry preferences in honeybees and their crab spider predators. Ethology 112:510–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge Ball State University’s Department of Biology for providing access to the Cooper Field Area, Dr. Jim Jones for statistical support, John Taylor for field assistance, Ball State University’s Office of Academic Research and Sponsored Programs for financial support, and Chad Hoefler for providing insights on the research methods and helpful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leo M. Stellwag.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stellwag, L.M., Dodson, G.N. Navigation by Male Crab Spiders Misumenoides formosipes (Araneae: Thomisidae): Floral Cues May Aid in Locating Potential Mates. J Insect Behav 23, 226–235 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-010-9209-9

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-010-9209-9

Keywords

Navigation