Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the type of alcohol policy in place in 4-year public universities against the odds of heavy drinking. Data was collected during the months of April-June 2010 using the Core Alcohol and Drug Survey. The participants included a random sample of undergraduate students from 4 public universities in the Midwest. Two of the universities had policies in place allowing the sale and use of alcohol on campus, and 2 universities had policies in place prohibiting the sale and use of alcohol. There were a total of 186 participants which included 63 males and 123 females. There was statistical significance in gender, age, and participation in sports against the odds of heavy drinking (P < .05). The type of policy in place was not significantly associated with the odds of heavy drinking. Even though there was an association between gender, age, and participation in sports with the odds of heavy drinking among college students in this sample, the type of alcohol policy (wet or dry) had no association. The results demonstrate the need for the implementation of alcohol prevention strategies, in addition to policy, to reduce the number of college students who drink heavily. It may be beneficial to target those alcohol intervention programs to the high risk groups such as males, over the age of 21, and those students who participate in sports.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Weschler, H., Lee, J., Nelson, T., & Kuo, M. (2002). Underage college students’ drinking behavior, access to alcohol, and the influence of deterrence policies: Findings from the Harvard School of public health college alcohol study. Journal of American College Health, 50, 223–236.
Mitchell, R., Toomey, T., & Erickson, D. (2005). Alcohol policies on college campuses. Journal of American College Health, 53, 149–158.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2008). Alcohol terms. Retrieved 3/1/10 from http://www.cdc.gov/print.do?url=http://www.cdc.gov.alcohol/terms.htm.
Thombs, D., Olds, R. S., Osborn, C., Casseday, S., Glavin, K., & Berkowitz, A. (2007). Outcomes of a technology-based social norms intervention to deter alcohol use in freshman residence halls. Journal of American College Health, 55, 325–332.
Taylor, D., Johnson, M., Voas, R., & Turrisi, R. (2006). Demographic and academic trends in drinking patterns and alcohol-related problems on dry college campuses. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 50, 35–55.
Kapner, D. (2008). Alcohol and other drugs on campus. The scope of the problem. The higher education center for alcohol and other drug abuse and violence prevention.
Hingson, R., Heeren, T., Winter, M., & Weschler, H. (2005). Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among US college students ages 18–24: Changes from 1998 to 2001. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 259–279. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144652.
Howard, D., Griffin, M., Boekeloo, B., Lake, K., & Bellows, D. (2007). Staying safe while consuming alcohol: A qualitative study of the protective strategies and informational needs of college students. Journal of American College Health, 56, 247–255.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2007). The social ecological model of prevention. Retrieved 11/01/09 from http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/dvp/social-ecological-model_DVP.htm.
California Department of Public Health (2008). Appendix 6: The social ecological model. Retrieved from http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/cpns/Documents/Network-Appendix6SocialEcologicalModel.pdf.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.
Core Institute. (2006). Alcohol and drug survey short form. Retrieved from http://www.core.siuc.edu/.
Turrisi, R., Mallett, K., Mastroleo, N., & Larimer, M. (2006). Heavy drinking in college students: Who is at risk and what is being done about it? The Journal of General Psychology, 133, 401–420.
Truong, K., & Sturm, R. (2009). Alcohol environments and disparities in exposure associated with adolescent drinking in California. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 264–271.
Wagoner, K., Rhodes, S., Lentz, A., & Wolfson, M. (2010). Community organizing goes to college: A practice-based model to implement environmental strategies to reduce high-risk drinking in college campuses. Health Promotion Practice. doi:10.1177/1524839909353726.
Dickerson, D., & Lake, P. (2006). Alcohol and campus risk management. Campus Activities Programming, 18.
DeJong, W. (2008). Experiences in effective prevention. The US department of education’s alcohol and other drug prevention models in college campuses grants. Retrieved 11/6/10 from http://www.higheredcenter.org/files/product/effective-prevention.pdf.
US Department of Education (n.d.). Higher Education Center for Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Violence Prevention. Addressing alcohol use on campus. Retrieved from http://www.higheredcenter.org/high-risk/alcohol/addressing.
Rhodes, W., Singleton, E., McMillan, T., & Perrino, C. (2005). Does knowledge of college drinking policy influence student binge drinking? Journal of American College Health, 54, 45–49.