Abstract
The impacts of two types of social desirability bias, self-deceptive enhancement (SDE) and impression management (IM), were examined on self-reports of gambling problems, measured by the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS), and recent gambling behavior, as measured by the Timeline Followback (TLFB) method, in a sample of college students (N = 191), and a sample of treatment-seeking problem gamblers (N = 49). Consistent with our expectations, IM was negatively associated with SOGS scores in both samples. IM was most highly correlated with SOGS scores among treatment-seeking participants (r = −.44, p < .01). Substantial numbers of participants in both samples had high enough IM scores as to call into question the validity of their self-report gambling data, according to published interpretive guidelines. With respect to SDE, we had predicted that it would be positively related to gambling behaviors and gambling-related problems, but found that SDE was inversely related to SOGS scores in both samples. Very little evidence was found for social desirability effects on TLFB scores. Thus, preliminary evidence was obtained that self-report data on gambling problems, but not on gambling behavior (frequency of gambling and amount of time and money spent), may be susceptible to the effects of impression management in both college students and treatment-seeking gamblers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd rev. ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1996). Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 261–272.
Chen, P. Y., Dai, T., Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1997). Relation between negative affectivity and positive affectivity: Effects of judged desirability of scale items and respondents’ social desirability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69(1), 183–198.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley.
Henderson, M. J. (2004). Psychological correlates of comorbid gambling in psychiatric outpatients: A pilot study. Substance Use & Misuse, 39(9), 1341–1352.
Hogan, J., & Ones, D. S. (1997). Conscientiousness and integrity at work. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 849–870). San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.
Ladouceur, R., Bouchard, C., Rhéaume, N., Jacques, C., Ferland, F., Leblond, J., & Walker, M. (2000). Is the SOGS an accurate measure of pathological gambling among children, adolescents, and adults? Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 1–24.
Langens, T. A., & Mörth, S. (2003). Repressive coping and the use of passive and active coping strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 461–473.
Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1188.
Li, A., & Bagger, J. (2007). The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR): A reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(3), 525–544.
Meston, C. M., Heiman, J. R., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Socially desirable responding and sexuality self-reports. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 148–157.
Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177–196.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.
Paulhus, D. L. (1998a). Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1197–1208.
Paulhus, D. L. (1998b). Paulhus Deception Scales (formerly known as the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding). Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems.
Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychology and educational measurement (pp. 49–69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Paulhus, D. L., Bruce, M. N., & Trapnell, P. D. (1995). Effects of self-presentation strategies on personality profiles and structure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 100–108.
Paulhus, D. L., Harms, P. D., Bruce, M. N., & Lysy, D. C. (2003). The over-claiming technique: Measuring self-enhancement independent of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 890–894.
Paulhus, D. L., & John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases: The interplay of self-deceptive mechanisms with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66(6), 1025–1060.
Paulhus, D. L., & Reid, D. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 307–317.
Pauls, C. A., & Stemmler, G. (2003). Substance and bias in social desirability responding. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 263–275.
Peterson, J. B., DeYoung, C. G., Driver-Linn, E., Seguine, J. R., Higgins, D. M., Arseneault, L., & Tremblay, R. E. (2003). Self-deception and failure to modulate responses despite accruing evidence of error. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 205–223.
Petry, N. M., & Armentano, C. (1999). Prevalence, assessment, and treatment of pathological gambling: A review. Psychiatric Services, 50, 1021–1027.
Robins, R. W., Tracy, J. L., Trzesniewski, K., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2001). Personality correlates of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 463–482.
Sinha, R. R., & Krueger, J. (1998). Idiographic self-evaluation and bias. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 131–155.
Smith, D. B., & Ellingson, J. E. (2002). Substance versus style: A new look at social desirability in motivating contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 211–219.
Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1996). Timeline Follow-Back: A calendar method for assessing alcohol and drug use. Toronto, Ontario: Addiction Research Foundation.
Stinchfield, R. (2002). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). Addictive Behaviors, 27, 1–19.
Stöber, J., Dette, D. E., & Musch, J. (2002). Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(2), 370–389.
Weinstock, J., Whelan, J. P., & Meyers, A. W. (2004). Behavioral assessment of gambling: An application of the Timeline Followback method. Psychological Assessment, 16(1), 72–80.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the research assistants who collected, entered, and checked data including Danijela Zlatevski, Ed Orehek, Robyn Childers, Jessica Beatty, Lissette Waldeck, Brad Rockafellow, Boddie Kamrani, and Marissa Burcham. Findings from an earlier version of this study were presented at the Convention of the National Center for Responsible Gaming, Las Vegas, NV on Dec. 8, 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuentzel, J.G., Henderson, M.J. & Melville, C.L. The Impact of Social Desirability Biases on Self-Report Among College Student and Problem Gamblers. J Gambl Stud 24, 307–319 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-008-9094-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-008-9094-8