Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Intimate Partner Violence Control Scale: Development and Initial Testing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although control has long been considered central to understanding intimate partner violence (IPV), there continues to be a notable lack of validated scales measuring control (e.g., Strauchler et al. Journal of Family Violence, 19(6), 339–354, 2004). The purpose of this study was to develop and empirically validate a brief assessment tool, the Intimate Partner Violence Control Scale (IPVCS), designed to measure control in the context of IPV. Data from a sample of male undergraduate and graduate students (n = 436) were used to examine the scale’s properties. After reviewing theoretical conceptualizations and measurement issues of control, psychometric properties of the IPVCS and results of exploratory hypotheses tests are presented. The availability of a brief and reliable measure of control offers a tool for professionals in the judicial system, for IPV victims’ advocates, and for human services workers in practice settings to adequately assess for control and fills a gap in this area of research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acock, A. (1997). Working with missing data. Family Science Review, 1, 76–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, D. (1990). Treatment models of men who batter: a profeminist analysis. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 176–199). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias, I., & Beach, S. R. H (1987). Validity of self-reports of marital violence. Journal of Family Violence, 2(2), 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartle, S. E., & Rosen, K. (1994). Individuation and relationship violence. The AmericanJournal of Family Therapy, 22(3), 220–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16, 296–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, J., & Dutton, D. G. (1986). Assessment of wife assault with the Conflict Tactics Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48(2), 375–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Malamuth, N. M. (1996). Sex, power, conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008). Adverse health conditions and health risk behaviors associated with intimate partner violence—United States, 2005. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 57(5), 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coker, A. L., Smith, P. H., Bethea, L., King, M. R., & McKeown, R. E. (2000). Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence. Archive of Family Medicine, 9, 451–457.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, D. H., & Straus, M. A. (1990). Marital power, conflict, and violence in a nationally representative sample of American couples. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 287–304). New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. R., & Frantz-Cook, A. (1984). A systemic treatment approach to wife battering. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 10(1), 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. L., & Goodman, L. A. (2006). Beyond frequency and severity: development of the brief coercion and conflict scales. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1050–1072.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corso, P. S., Mercy, J. A., Simon, T. R., Finkelstein, E. A., & Miller, T. R. (2007). Medical costs and productivity losses due to interpersonal violence and self-directed violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(6), 474–482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1993). An evolutionary psychological perspective on male sexual proprietariness and violence against wives. Violence and Victims, 8, 271–294.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demare, E., Lips, H. M., & Briere, J. (1993). Sexually violent pornography, anti-women attitudes, and sexual aggression: A structural equation model. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1992). Women, violence and social change. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G. (1988). The domestic assault against women: Psychological and criminal justice perspectives. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., & Hemphill, K. J. (1992). Patterns of Socially Desirable Responding Among Perpetrators and Victims of Wife Assault. Violence and Victims, 7(1), 29–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., & Strachan, C. E. (1987). Motivational needs for power and spouse-specific assertiveness in assaultive and non-assaultive men. Violence and Victims, 2(3), 145–156.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, M. A., & Goodman, L. A. (2005). Coercion in intimate partner violence: toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52, 743–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J., & Browne, A. (1994). Violence between spouses and intimates: Physical aggression between women and men in intimate relationships. In A. J. Reiss & J. A. Roth (Eds.), Understanding and preventing violence ((pp, Vol. 3, pp. 115–292). Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R. (2002). Violence and gender reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R. B., & Messner, S. F. (2000). The control motive in intimate partner violence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(1), 86–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R. B., & Outlaw, M. C. (2007). The control motive and marital violence. Violence and Victims, 22(4), 387–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geffner, R., Mantooth, C., Franks, D., & Rao, L. (1989). A psychoeducational, conjoint therapy approach to reducing family violence. In P. Ceasar & L. K. Hamberger (Eds.), Treating men who batter: Theory, practice and programs (pp. 103–133). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R. J., & Straus, M. A. (1979). Determinants of violence in the family: Toward a theoretical integration. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family, vol. 1 (pp. 549–581). New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, J. (1999). Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for mental disorders: a metaanalysis. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 99–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E., & Russell, D. (1986). The case against anger control treatment programs for batterers. Response, 9(3), 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(2), 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M., & Ferraro, K. (2000). Research on intimate partner violence in the 1990 s: making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: research update and implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46(3), 476–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual experiences survey: a research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50(3), 455–457.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., & Gidycz, C. A. (1985). Sexual experiences survey: reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(3), 422–423.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., Leonard, K. E., Beezley, D. A., & Oros, C. J. (1985). Nonstranger sexual aggression: a discriminant analysis of the psychological characteristics of undetected offenders. Sex Roles, 12, 981–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N. M. (1986). Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 953–962.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N. M., Sockloskie, R. J., Koss, M. P., & Tanaka, J. S. (1991). Characteristics of aggressors against women: testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 670–681.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N. M., Linz, D., Heavey, C. L., Barnes, G., & Acker, M. (1995). Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men’s conflict with women: a 10-year follow-up study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 353–369.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S., & Nichols, M. (1993). Family healing: Tales of hope and renewal from family therapy. New York: The Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. E. (2006). Controversy, constraints, and context: understanding familyviolence through family systems theory. The Family Journal, 14(3), 234–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, K. R., & Burkhart, B. R. (1984). Personality and attitudinal characteristics of sexually coercive college males. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 216–221.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rennison, C. M. (2003). Crime data brief: Intimate partner violence, 1993–2001. (NCJ no. 197838). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, E. E., Protinsky, H. O., & Viers, D. (2002). Levels of differentiation and marital egalitarianism in men who batter. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 14(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. (1992). Interactive processes in dating aggression: a national study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(1), 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauchler, O., McCloskey, K., Malloy, K., Sitaker, M., Grigsby, N., & Gillig, P. (2004). Humiliation, manipulation, and control: evidence of centrality in intimate partner violence against an adult partner. Journal of Family Violence, 19(6), 339–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the conflict tactics scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1990). The Conflict Tactics Scales and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8, 145 families. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1995). Manual for the conflict tactic scales. Durham N. H.: Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire.

  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, J. T., & Felson, R. (1994). Violence, aggression, and coercive actions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, D. S., & Brackley, M. (2005). Men who batter intimate partners: a grounded theory study of the development of male violence in intimate partner relationships. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 26, 281–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yllo, K., & Straus, M. A. (1990). Patriarchy and violence against wives: The impact of structural and normative factors. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8, 145 families (pp. 383–399). New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zosky, D. L. (1999). The application of object relations theory to domestic violence. Clinical Social Work Journal, 27(1), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kent School of Social Work, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA

    Linda K. Bledsoe & Bibhuti K. Sar

Authors
  1. Linda K. Bledsoe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bibhuti K. Sar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda K. Bledsoe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bledsoe, L.K., Sar, B.K. Intimate Partner Violence Control Scale: Development and Initial Testing. J Fam Viol 26, 171–184 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9351-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9351-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation