Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Gender Differences in the Nature of the Intimate Partner Violence and Effects of Perpetrator Arrest on Revictimization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The majority of research on intimate partner violence (IPV) has addressed male-to-female violence, although a small but growing body of literature has developed that explores males victimized by female partners. This study used data from the National Crime Victimization Survey from 1987 to 2003 to examine male victimization by comparing the nature of violence to female victimization and by exploring the effect of perpetrator arrest on preventing revictimization. The sample was comprised of 2,462 female and 298 male victims. Study variables included gender, arrest, revictimization, type of violence, injury, and use of a weapon. Results showed that men were victimized by IPV less frequently than women and received fewer injuries, although they were more likely to experience more severe violence. Police arrested female perpetrators, but generally only if injury was involved; however, arrest did not reduce male victims’ chance of revictimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, C., DuPree, C., Miller, N., Spence, D., & Uekert, B. (2003). National evaluation of the grants to encourage arrest policies program. Revised final report. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumer, E. P., Felson, R. B., & Messner, S. F. (2003). Changes in police notification for rape, 1973–2000. Criminology, 41(3), 841–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, B. S. (2000). Perceived sanction threats, gender, and crime: a test and elaboration of power-control theory. Criminology, 38, 439–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, A. L., & Rosenberg, M. S. (2004). Comparing women and men arrested for domestic violence: a preliminary report. Journal of Family Violence, 19(1), 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascardi, M., & Vivian, D. (1995). Context for specific episodes of marital violence: gender and severity of violence differences. Journal of Family Violence, 10(3), 265–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, S. (2008). Intimate partner violence in the United States. Retrieved February 15, 2008, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/intimate/ipv.htm.

  • Cattaneo, L. B., & Goodman, L. A. (2005). Risk factors for reabuse in intimate partner violence: a cross-disciplinary critical review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 6(2), 141–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H. (2007). Effects of arrest of domestic violence batterers on reducing victims’ revictimization: An analysis of the national crime victimization survey from 1987 to 2003. Paper presented at the 11th Society for Social Work and Research Annual Conference.

  • Davis, T. E. (2004). The effects of domestic violence on male victims in the United States Marine Corps. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 64(7-B), 3579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. P., & Dobash, R. E. (2004). Women’s violence to men in intimate relationships: working on a puzzle. The British Journal of Criminology, 44(3), 324–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: a meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 309–330.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R. B., Ackerman, J. M., & Gallagher, C. (2005). Police intervention and the repeat of domestic assault. Washington: US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. A. (2003). Coercing victim participation in domestic violence prosecutions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(6), 669–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. P. (1986). Deterrence theory and research. In G. B. Melton (Ed.), The law as a behavioral instrument: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1985. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblat, C. S. (1983). A hit is a hit is a hit ... or is it? Approval and tolerance of the use of physical force by spouses. In D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hotaling, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families (pp. 235–260). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfeld, L., Rand, M., Craven, D., Klaus, P., Perkins, C., Ringel, C., et al. (1998). Violence by intimates: Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends and girlfriends. Washington: US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, R. M. (2001, May 25, 2001). Breaking the silence: Sociologist studies woman-to-woman sexual violence. Retrieved June 3, 2005, from http://www.gayhealth.com/templates/1117829363937302884179/common/feature.html?record=58.

  • Hamberger, L. K., & Guse, C. E. (2002). Men’s and women’s use of intimate partner violence in clinical samples. Violence Against Women, 8, 1301–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henning, K., & Feder, L. (2004). A comparison of men and women arrested for domestic violence: who presents the greater threat? Journal of Family Violence, 19(2), 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschel, J. D., & Hutchison, I. W. (1992). Female spouse abuse and the police response: the Charlotte, North Carolina experiment. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83, 73–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotaling, G. T., & Buzawa, E. S. (2001). An analysis of assaults in rural communities: Final report. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, N. (1994). Men who batter, profile from a restraining order database. Archives of Family Medicine, 3, 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 948–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. A., & Belknap, J. (1999). Police response to battering in a progressive pro-arrest jurisdictin. Justice Quarterly, 16, 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R. (1999). Patterns of arrest in domestic violence encounters: identifying a police decision-making model. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R. J. (2000). Police responses to restraining orders in domestic violence incidents: identifying the custody-threshold thesis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 561–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langan, P. A., & Innes, C. A. (1986). Preventing domestic violence against women (No. NCJ-102037). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

  • Martin, M. (1997). Double your trouble: dual arrest in family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, C., Garner, J., & Fagan, J. (2001). The effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: New evidence from the Spouse Assault Replication Program. Research in brief. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, H. C., & Belknap, J. (2003). He hits, she hits: assessing gender differences and similarities in officially reported intimate partner violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(3), 328–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. J., Bobner, R. F., & Zarski, J. J. (2000). Sexual identity development: a base for work with same-sex couple partner abuse. Contemporary Family Therapy, 22(2), 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, K., & O’Leary, K. D. (1999). Head injury and battered women: an initial inquiry. Health and Social Work, 24, 269–278.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications (2nd ed.). Boston: Duxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennison, C. M., & Welchans, S. (2000). Intimate partner violence (No. NCJ-178247). Washington: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. L. (2000). The effect of a domestic violence policy change on police officers’ schemata. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 600–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G. (1988). Wife abuse, husband abuse or mutual combat? A feminist perspective on the empirical findings. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 90–113). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, J. A., Feldbau-Kohn, S., Slep, A. M. S., & Heyman, R. E. (2001). Risk factors for male-to-female partner physical abuse. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 281–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261–272.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S. S., Bouffard, L. A., Garner, J., & Hickman, L. (2006). The influence of legal reform on the probability of arrest in domestic violence cases. Justice Quarterly, 23(3), 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the conflict tactics scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1993). Physical assaults by wives: A major social problem. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 67–87). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975–1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbets, S. G., & Herz, D. C. (1996). Gender differences in factors of social control and rational choice. Deviant Behavior, 17, 183–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Research report. Washington: National Institute of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. R. (2005). Arrest and intimate partner violence: toward a more complete application of deterrence theory. Aggression and Violenct Behavior, 10(6), 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Work, Michigan State University, 254 Baker Hall, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    Hyunkag Cho

  2. College of Social Work, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-2570, USA

    Dina J. Wilke

Authors
  1. Hyunkag Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dina J. Wilke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyunkag Cho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cho, H., Wilke, D.J. Gender Differences in the Nature of the Intimate Partner Violence and Effects of Perpetrator Arrest on Revictimization. J Fam Viol 25, 393–400 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9300-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9300-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation