Abstract
This exploratory study investigated factors that Child Protective Service caseworkers believe lead to change for the domestic violence abuser and victim, and ultimately lead to success in terms of reunifying children who have been removed from their parents due to domestic violence. In-depth interviews with six caseworkers examined both successful reunification cases and unsuccessful reunification cases. The interview was structured around three areas of interest: services, the caseworker’s relationship with the parents, and social supports, in order to identify variables that may influence the family’s ability (or inability) to make the necessary changes for reunification with their children. Results revealed that successful reunifications took place within the families who fully engaged in services, admitted the issues within the family home, set clear boundaries with each other, and sought and maintained an appropriate support system. Implications for caseworkers involved with families experiencing domestic violence, as well as directions for future research, are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Edleson, J. L., Gassman-Pines, J., & Hill, M. H. (2006). Defining child exposure to domestic violence as neglect: Minnesota's difficult experience. Social Work, 51, 167–174.
English, D. J., Marshall, D. B., & Stewart, A. J. (2003). Effects of family violence on child behavior and health during early childhood. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 43–57.
Findlater, J. E., & Kelly, S. (1999). Child protective services and domestic violence. The Future of Children, 9, 84–96.
Johnson, C. F. (2002). Child Maltreatment 2002: Recognition, reporting and risk. Pediatrics International, 44, 554–560.
Matthews, M. A. (1999). The impact of Federal and State laws on children exposed to domestic violence. The Future of Children, 9, 50–66.
McDonald, R., Jouriles, E., Briggs-Gowan, M., Rosenfield, D., & Carter, A. (2007). Violence toward a family member, angry adult conflict, and child adjustment difficulties: Relations in families with 1 to 3 year old children. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 176–184.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Osofsky, J. D. (2003). Prevalence of children's exposure to domestic violence and child maltreatment: Implications for prevention and intervention. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 6, 161–169.
Packard, T., Jones, L., & Nahrstedt, K. (2006). Using the image exchange to enhance interdisciplinary team building in child welfare. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 23, 86–106.
Panchanadeswaran, S., & McCloskey, L. A. (2007). Predicting the timing of women's departure from abusive relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 50–65.
Pennell, J., & Buford, G. (2000). Family group decision making: Protecting children and women. Child Welfare, 79, 131–158.
Rivers, J. E., Maze, C. L., Hannah, S. A., & Lederman, C. S. (2007). Domestic violence screening and service acceptance among adult victims in a dependency court setting. Child Welfare, 86, 123–144.
Roditti, M. G. (2005). Understanding communities of neglectful parents: Child caregiving networks and child neglect. Child Welfare, 84, 277–294.
Sahonchik, K. (2001). New domestic violence guidelines for public child welfare. Managing care for Children and Families, 3, 1–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cole, M.A., Caron, S.L. Exploring Factors Which Lead to Successful Reunification in Domestic Violence Cases: Interviews with Caseworkers. J Fam Viol 25, 297–310 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9292-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9292-x