Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparison of Civil and Criminal Orders of Protection as Remedies for Domestic Violence Victims in a Midwestern County

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Past research has identified many potential advantages of civil protection orders as a means of addressing domestic violence without invoking an official response of the criminal justice system. Using data from a Midwestern county, this exploratory study provides a comparison of civil protection orders with orders of protection that are filed in conjunction with a criminal battering arrest. We examine the demographic characteristics of the respondents/defendants and petitioners/victims, the nature of the abuse leading up to the filing of the protection order, the reasons for filing, the terms of the order, location of the offense, and violations of orders. Our findings reveal many similarities between types of orders, in terms of order stipulations, past abuse histories of petitioners/victims, and respondents/defendants’ likelihood of reoffending. The findings also reveal an important difference in the petitioners’ and victims’ reasons for filing; whereas petitioners in civil cases were more likely to identify emotional abuse as the factor leading up to issuance of the order, victims in criminal cases were more likely to document physical abuse. We discuss these findings in the context of victim preference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abolfazli, L. (2006). Criminal law chapter: Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). Georgetown Journal of Gender & the Law, 7, 863–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (1996). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (2003). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caringella-MacDonald, S. (1988). Parallels and pitfalls: The aftermath of the legal reform of sexual assault, marital rape, and domestic violence victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3(2), 174–189. doi:10.1177/088626088003002004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. J., Harris, S. D., & Holden, G. W. (1999). Protective orders and domestic violence: Risk factors for re-abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 14(2), 205–226. doi:10.1023/A:1022032904116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, M., & Daly, K. (1992). Do restraining orders help? Battered women’s experience with male violence and the legal process. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Domestic violence: The changing criminal justice response, pp. 227–254. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coker, D. C. (2001). Piercing webs of power: Identity, resistance, and hope in latcrit theories and praxis: Shifting power for battered women: Law, material resources, and poor women of color. University of California Davis Law Review, 33, 1009–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K., & Rose, M. (1995). When “enough is enough”: Battered women’s decision making around court orders of protection. Crime and Delinquency, 41(4), 414–429. doi:10.1177/0011128795041004003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. W., McWilliams, J., Hart, B., & Stuehling, J. (1994). Court response to petitions for civil protection orders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9(4), 503–517. doi:10.1177/088626094009004005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grau, J., Fagan, J., & Wexler, S. (1985). Restraining orders for battered women: Issues of access and efficacy. In C. Schweber & C. Feinman (Eds.), Criminal justice policies and women: The aftermath of legally mandated change, pp. 13–28. New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, A., & Smith, B. (1996). Effects of restraining orders on domestic violence victims. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work?, pp. 214–242. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, A., Smith, B., & Newmark, L. (1993). Court processing of restraining orders for domestic violence. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, V. L., Kernic, M. A., Wolf, M. E., & Rivara, F. P. (2003). Do protection orders affect the likelihood of future partner violence and injury? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24(1), 16–21. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(02) 00576-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, A., Simonidis, K., & Simonidis, L. (1987). Legal remedies for spousal abuse: Victim characteristics, expectations, and satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence, 2(3), 265–279. doi:10.1007/BF00976544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keilitz, S.L., Davis, C., Efkeman, H.S., Flango, C., & Hannaford, P.L.(1998). Civil protection orders: Victims’ views on effectiveness. National Institute of Justice Research Preview. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

  • Klein, A. (1996). Re-abuse in a population of court-restrained male batterers: Why restraining orders don’t work. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work?, pp. 192–213. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko, C. N. (2002). Civil restraining orders for domestic violence: The unresolved question of “efficacy”. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 11, 361–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malecha, A., McFarlane, J., Gist, J., Watson, K., Batten, E., Hall, I., et al. (2003). Applying for and dropping a protection order: A study with 150 women. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14, 486–504. doi:10.1177/0887403403255496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. C. (2003). Engaging with the state: The growing reliance on lawyers and judges to protect battered women. The American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 11, 499–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rios, J. (2006). What’s the hold-up? Making the case for lifetime orders of protection in New York State. Cardoza Journal of Law & Gender, 12, 709–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, N. W. (2003). Promoting justice through interdisciplinary teaching, practice, and scholarship civil orders for protection: Freedom or entrapment? Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 11, 157–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau.(2000). Basic facts: Geographic comparison table. Retrieved on August 10, 2008, from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/Ba... C_1990 STF1 GCTPA ST2 & geo id=04000US17

  • Wallace, H. (2008). Family violence: Legal, medical, and social perspectives. Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Criminal Justice Sciences Department, Illinois State University, Campus Box 5250, Normal, IL, 61790-5250, USA

    Sesha Kethineni & Dawn Beichner

Authors
  1. Sesha Kethineni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dawn Beichner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sesha Kethineni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kethineni, S., Beichner, D. A Comparison of Civil and Criminal Orders of Protection as Remedies for Domestic Violence Victims in a Midwestern County. J Fam Viol 24, 311–321 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9231-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9231-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation