Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Battered Women Who Kill: Variables Affecting Simulated Jurors' Verdicts

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present experiment investigated the effects of situational, participant and defendant variables on simulated jurors' verdicts in a case where a battered woman has killed her abuser. One-hundred thirty male and female undergraduates from multicultural and African American samples read a trial transcript in which the battered woman was either Caucasian or African American, and had been either physically or emotionally abused. The hypothesis that the defendant would be judged guilty more often in the emotional abuse case was confirmed. No significant differences were found between African American and Caucasian defendants, and between male and female participants, innumber of guilty verdicts. Male participants, and those who had no personal experience with domestic violence, showed significantly less knowledge of the battering situation. Situational factors, such as type of abuse, rather than defendant or participant variables, such as gender, race or prior knowledge, affected number of guilty verdicts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aubrey, M., and Ewing, C. (1989). Student and voter subjects: Differences in attitudes toward battered women. J. Interpers. Violence 4: 289–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, R. (1994). Violence against women: A National Crime Victimization Survey Report. Washington. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

  • Blackman, J. (1990). Emerging images of severely battered women and the criminal justice system. Behav. Sci. Law 8(2): 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley, S., and Beckett, J. (1988). Black Battered women: A review of empirical literature. J. Counsel. Dev. 66(6): 266–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, C. (1987). Battered Women Who Kill, Lexington, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. (1996). Domestic violence, gender, and perceptions of justice. Sex Roles 35(7/8): 507–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkle, N., and Handel, S. (1988). Jurors and insanity: Do test instructions instruct? Forens. Rep. 1: 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkle, N., and Handel, S. (1989). How jurors construe “insanity.” Law Hum. Behav. 15: 495–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D., Brodino, M., and Kleinfelter, K. (1996). Reputation and behavior of Battered women who kill their partners. J. Fam. Violence 11(3): 251–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D., Polek, D., Hause, E., Daeton, L., Bulger, M., and Conway, Z. (1989). Factors predicting verdicts in cases where battered women kill their husbands. Law Hum. Behav. 13(4): 253–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R., and Straus, M. (1988). Intimate Violence, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, E., Raitz, A., and Lindblad, H. (1989). Jurors' knowledge of battered women. J. Fam. Violence 4(2): 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, K. (1994). Domestic partner abuse: Expanding paradigms for understanding and intervention. Violence Victims 9(2): 91–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkle, A., Smeltzer, D., Allen, C., and King, G. (1983). The judgment of college students and jurors concerning sanity and guilty of an alleged murderer. J. Soc. Psychol. 120: 253–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasian, M., Soanos, N., Terrance, C., and Peebles, S. (1993). Battered women who kill: Jury simulation and legal defenses. Law Hum. Behav. 17(3): 289–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, L., and Richman, C. (1999). Attitudes toward domestic violence: Race and gender issues. Sex Roles 40(3/4): 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mechanic, M. (2000). The influence of prior knowledge and attitudes on juror receptivity to expert testimony in a simulated battered woman's homicide case. Court Call Summer 2000, 1–11.

  • National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (1995). Membership newsletter, p. 1–5.

  • Ptacek, J. (1988). Why do men batter their wives? In Bergen, R. (ed.), Issues in Intimate Violence, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, Ch. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, L., and Saunders, D. (2001). The impact of different forms of psychological abuse on battered women. In O'Leary, K., and Maiuro, R. (eds.), Psychological Abuse in Violent Domestic Relations, Springer, New York, pp. 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. (1999). The battered woman syndrome defense. In Gerdes, L. (ed.), Battered Women, Greenhaven, San Diego, CA, Ch. 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane Braden-Maguire.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braden-Maguire, J., Sigal, J. & Perrino, C.S. Battered Women Who Kill: Variables Affecting Simulated Jurors' Verdicts. J Fam Viol 20, 403–408 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-7801-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-7801-0

Key Words

Navigation