Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Normative Measures of Tax Progressivity: an International Comparison

  • Published:
The Journal of Economic Inequality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relevance of tax progressivity measures to policymaking depends on whether they help assess the extent to which taxation leads to social welfare gains or losses. The social welfare implications of progressivity measures have yet to be explored adequately in the literature. This paper helps to fill this gap by proposing a social welfare function framework to derive measures of tax progressivity and explore their normative properties. Using the social welfare framework, the paper derives the Kakwani index from Sen’s social welfare function as well as a new class of progressivity measures that incorporate a distributional judgment parameter capturing inequality aversion. The paper also discusses the social welfare implications of the Suits measure of tax progressivity and develops a new measure of tax progressivity derived from the Bonferroni social welfare function. The paper derives both relative and absolute measures of tax progressivity from the social welfare function framework. The methodology developed in the paper is applied to make international comparisons of tax progressivity in 32 developed countries. The paper calculates the magnitude of welfare gains and losses due to taxation and the required social rates of return of public investments for governments to break even. This paper finds that the governments in some countries have to generate high social rates of return from their public investments to compensate for losses of social welfare from taxation. It concludes that optimizing social welfare requires designing a progressive tax system, minimizing the administrative costs of collecting taxes, and maximizing the social rates of return by efficiently investing tax revenues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Aronson, J., Johnson, P., Lambert, P.: Redistributive effects and unequal income tax treatment. Econ. J. 104(423), 262–270 (1994)

  • Atkinson, A.: On the measurement of inequality. J. Econ. Theory. 2, 244–263 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.: How progressive should income tax be? In: Parkin, M. (ed.) Essays on Modern Economics. Longman, London (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.: Horizontal equity and the distribution of the tax burden. In: Aaron, H.J., Boskin, M.J. (eds.) Economics of Taxation. Pp. 3–18. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C., Donaldson, D.: Ethical social index numbers and the measurement of effective tax/benefit progressivity. Can. J. Econ. 17, 683–694 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C., Bossert, W., Donaldson, D.: Income Inequality Measurement: the Normative Approach. In: Silber, J. (ed.) Handbook of Income Inequality Measurement, pp. 133–157. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1999)

  • Bonferroni, C.: Elmenti di Statistica Generale. Libreria Seber, Firenze (1930)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosmans, K., Decancq, K., Decoster, A.: The relativity of decreasing inequality between countries. Economica. 81(322), 276–292 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, W., Pfingsten, A.: Intermediate inequality: concepts, indices, and welfare implications. Math. Soc. Sci. 19, 117–134 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duclos, J., Jalbert, V., Araar, A.: Classical horizontal inequity and reranking: an integrated approach. Research on Economic Inequality. 10, 65–100 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, U.: Coherent inequality views: linear invariant measures reconsidered. Math. Soc. Sci. 47(1), 1–20 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, U.: Inequality reducing taxation reconsidered. In: Bishop, J. (ed.). Research on Economic Inequality. 18(18), 131–152 (2010)

  • Ebert, U., Moyes, P.: Consistent income tax structures when households are heterogeneous. J. Econ. Theory. 90(1), 116–150 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbert, U.: Measurement of inequality: an attempt at unification and generalization. Soc. Choice Welf. 5, 147–169 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fei, J.: Equity oriented fiscal programs. Econometrica. 49, 869–881 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M.: On the theory of tax reform. J. Public Econ. 6, 77–104 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Formby, J., Seaks, T., Smith, W.: A comparison of two new measures of tax progressivity. Econ. J. 91, 1015–1019 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajdos, T.: Les fondements axiomatiques de la mesure normative des inegalites. Revue d’economie. 5, 683–720 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, C., Klemm, A., Liu, L., Mylonas, V.: Income tax progressivity: trends and implications. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 0305–9049. doi.https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12331 (2019)

  • Iman, L., Conover, W.: Approximations of the critical region for ‘s rho with and without ties present. Communication in Statistics: Simulation and Computation. 7, 269–282 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Itsumi, Y.: The distributional effect of linear income-tax schedules. Review of Economic Studies. 41, 371–381 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson, U.: On the measurement of the degree of progression. J. Public Econ. 5, 161–168 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S.: Empirical measurement of horizontal inequity. J. Public Econ. 37, 305–329 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S., Lambert, P.: Horizontal inequity measurement: A basic reassessment. In: Silber, J. (ed.) Handbook of Income Inequality Measurement, pp. 535–56. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1999)

  • Kakwani, N.: Measurement of tax progressivity: an international comparison. Economic Journal. 87, 71–80 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakwani, N.: Income Inequality and Poverty Methods of Estimation and Policy Applications. Oxford University Press, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakwani, N.: On the measurement of tax progressivity and redistributive effect of taxes with applications to horizontal and vertical equity. Adv. Econ. 3, 149–168 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakwani, N., Lambert, P.: On measuring inequity in taxation: a new approach. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 14, 369–380 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplow, L.: Horizontal equity: measures in search of a principle. Natl. Tax J. 42(2), 139–154 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.: Unequal inequalities I. J. Econ. Theory. 12, 416–442 (1976a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.: Unequal inequalities II. J. Econ. Theory. 13, 82–111 (1976b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, P., Ramos, X.: Horizontal inequity and vertical redistribution. Int. Tax Public Financ. 4(1), 25–37 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantovani, D., Pellegrino, S., Vernizzi, A.: A note on the maximum value of the Kakwani index. Empir. Econ. 24, 1524–1526 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M., Green, J.: Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, J.: An exploration in the theory of optimum taxation. Review of Economic Studies. 38, 175–208 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Monti, M., Vernizzi, A., Mussini, M.: The decomposition of the Atkinson-Plotnick-Kakwani re-ranking measure. Italian Journal of Applied Statistics. 22(2), 177–198 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyes, P.: A note on minimally progressive taxation and absolute income inequality. Soc. Choice Welf. 5(2–3), 227–234 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R., Thin, T.: Income tax progression of 1929–48. J. Polit. Econ. 56, 498–514 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, A.: Equality and Efficiency: the Big Trade-off. Brookings Institutions, Washington, DC (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfingsten, A.: Axiomatically based local measures of tax progression. Bull. Econ. Res. 39(3), 211–223 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfingsten, A.: Progressive taxation and redistributive taxation: different labels for the same product? Soc. Choice Welf. 5(2–3), 235–246 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A.: A Study in Public Finance, 3rd edn. Macmillan, London (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitman, E.: Significance Tests that May Be Applied to Samples from any Population: II. The Correlation Coefficient Test. Journal of Royal Statistical Society. supplement 4, 225–232 (1937)

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotnick, R.: A measure of horizontal equity. Rev. Econ. Stat. 63, 283–288 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotnick, R.: The concept and measurement of horizontal inequity. J. Public Econ. 17(3), 373–391 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R.: Additive utility functions and linear Engel curves. Review of Economic Studies. 38(4), 401–414 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.: A contribution to the theory of taxation. Economic Journal. 37, 47–61 (1927)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M., Smolensky, E.: Public expenditures, taxes, and the distribution of income: United States, 1950, 1961, 1970. Academic Press. (1977)

  • Rosen, H.: An approach to the study of income, utility, and horizontal equity. Q. J. Econ. 92, 307–322 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.: Informational bases of welfare approaches. J. Public Econ. 3, 387–403 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheshinski, E.: The optimal linear income taxation. Review of Economic Studies. 39, 297–302 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheshinski, E.: A model of social security and retirement decisions. J. Public Econ. 10, 337–360 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Son, H.: Equity and Well-Being: Measurement and Policy Practice. Routledge, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Suits, D.: Measurement of tax progressivity. Am. Econ. Rev. 67, 747–752 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, I.: Contributions of taxes and benefits to vertical and horizontal effects. Soc. Choice Welf. 42(3), 619–645 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, I.: Measuring Redistributive Effects of Taxes and Benefits: Beyond the Proportionality Standard. FinanzArchiv. 75(4), 413–443 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1628/fa-20190008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van De Ven, J., Creedy, J., Lambert, P.: Close equals and calculation of the vertical, horizontal, and reranking effects of taxation. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 63(3), 381–394 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaari, M.: A controversial proposal concerning inequality measurement. J. Econ. Theory. 44(2), 381–397 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, S.: On an extension of the Gini index. Int. Econ. Rev. 24, 617–628 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to Ivica Urban from the Institute of Public Finance, Zagreb for his thoughtful comments on an earlier version of the paper. We are also grateful to Xu Jing from Shanghai University of Finance and Economics for making it possible to undertake international comparisons of tax progressivity. We would also like to acknowledge Ellen McEwen for her editorial assistance. We are most thankful to two referees for their insightful and constructive comments, which helped improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Nanak Kakwani

  2. Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

    Nanak Kakwani

  3. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong City, Philippines

    Hyun Hwa Son

Authors
  1. Nanak Kakwani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hyun Hwa Son
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nanak Kakwani.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kakwani, N., Son, H.H. Normative Measures of Tax Progressivity: an International Comparison. J Econ Inequal 19, 185–212 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-020-09463-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-020-09463-6

Keywords

JEL Classification