Abstract
Social insects are defined by their ability to divide labor among their numerous nestmates. This is achieved via a complex system of chemical communication that allows colonies to organize task activity so as to maximize the productivity of the colony. However, the mechanism by which social insects distinguish task groups among morphologically identical individuals remains unknown. Using the honey bee, Apis mellifera, as our model species, we investigated the presence of task-specific patterns in the cuticular lipids (n-alkanes, fatty acids, and alkenes) of bees. Cuticular lipids are known to play an essential role in the recognition processes of insects. We found task-specific features in the n-alkane and alkene profiles of bees, but no task-specific patterns in the fatty acid profile. Foragers, in particular, had elevated levels of n-alkanes relative to nurse and newly emerged bees, suggesting increased waterproofing. Newly emerged bees had low levels of cuticular lipids, supporting the Blank Slate theory and potentially explaining their acceptance into foreign colonies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitchison, J. 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data. Chapman & Hall, London.
Armold, M. T., Blomquist, G. J., and Jackson, L. L. 1969. Cuticular lipids of insects. 3. Surface lipids of aquatic and terrestrical life forms of big stonefly, Pteronarcys carlifornica Newport. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 31B:685–692.
Blomquist, G. J., Howard, R. W., McDaniel, C. A., Remaley, S., Dwyer, L. A., and Nelson, D. R. 1980. Application of methoxymercuration-demercuration followed by mass-spectrometry as a convenient microanalytical technique for double-bond location in insect-derived alkenes. J. Chem. Ecol. 6:257–269.
Bonavitacougourdan, A., Clement, J. L., and Lange, C. 1993. Functional subcaste discrimination (foragers and brood-tenders) in the ant Camponotus-vagus scop—Polymorphism of cuticular hydrocarbon patterns. J. Chem. Ecol. 19:1461–1477.
Breed, M. D. 1998. Recognition pheromones of the honey bee. Bioscience 48:463–470.
Breed, M. D., and Stiller, T. M. 1992. Honey-bee, Apis mellifera, nestmate discrimination—hydrocarbon effects and the evolutionary implications of comb choice. Anim. Behav. 43:875–883.
Breed, M. D., Stiller, T. M., and Moor, M. J. 1988. The ontogeny of kin discrimination cues in the hoeny bee, Apis mellifera. Behav. Genet. 18:439–448.
Breed, M. D., Leger, E. A., Pearce, A. N., and Wang, Y. J. 1998. Comb wax effects on the ontogeny of honey bee nestmate recognition. Anim. Behav. 55:13–20.
Breed, M. D., Perry, S., and Bjostad, L. B. 2004. Testing the blank slate hypothesis: why honey bee colonies accept young bees. Insect. Soc. 51:12–16.
Carlson, D. A. 1988. Hydrocarbons for identification and phenetic comparisons—cockroaches, honey bees and tsetse flies. Fla. Entomol. 71:333–345.
Chaline, N., Sandoz, J. C., Martin, S. J., Ratnieks, F. L. W., and Jones, G. R. 2005. Learning and discrimination of individual cuticular hydrocarbons by honeybees (Apis mellifera). Chem. Senses 30:327–335.
Dani, F. R., Corsi, S., Pradella, D., Jones, G. R., and Turillazzi, S. 2004. GC-MS analysis of the epicuticle lipids of Apis mellifera reared in central Italy. Insect Social Life 5:103–109.
Dani, F. R., Jones, G. R., Corsi, S., Beard, R., Pradella, D., and Turillazzi, S. 2005. Nestmate recognition cues in the honey bee: Differential importance of cuticular alkanes and alkenes. Chem. Senses 30:477–489.
Del Piccolo, F., Nazzi, F., Della Vedova, G., and Milani, N. 2010. Selection of Apis mellifera workers by the parasitic mite Varroa destructor using host cuticular hydrocarbons. Parasitology 137:967–973.
Gibbs, A. 1995. Physical properties of insect cuticular hydrocarbons: Model mixtures and lipid interactions. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 112B:667–672.
Gibbs, A. G. 1998. Water-proofing properties of cuticular lipids. Am. Zool. 38:471–482.
Gibbs, A., and Pomonis, J. G. 1995. Physical-properties of insect cuticular hydrocarbons—the effects of chain-length, methyl-branching and unsaturation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 112B:243–249.
Gibbs, A., Mousseau, T. A., and Crowe, J. H. 1991. Genetic and acclimatory variation in biophysical properties of insect cuticle lipids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:7257–7260.
Greene, M. J., and Gordon, D. M. 2003. Cuticular hydrocarbons inform task decisions. Nature 423:32.
Hadley, N. F., and Schultz, T. D. 1987. Water-loss in 3 species of tiger beetles (Cicindela)—Correlations with epicuticular hydrocarbons. J. Insect Physiol. 33:677–682.
Holldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O. 1990. The Ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Howard, R. W., and Blomquist, G. J. 2005. Ecological, behavioral, andbiochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 50:371–393.
Howard, R. W., McDaniel, C. A., Nelson, D. R., Blomquist, G. J., Gelbaum, L. T., and Zalkow, L. H. 1982. Cuticular hydrocarbons of Reticulitermes virginicus (Banks) (Isoptera, Rhinotermitidae) and their role as potential species-recognition and caste-recognition cues. J. Chem. Ecol. 8:1227–1239.
Lenoir, A., D’Ettorre, P., Errard, C., and Hefetz, A. 2001. Chemical ecology and social parasitism in ants. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46:573–599.
Lockey, K. H. 1988. Lipids of the insect cuticle—Origin, composition and function. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 89B:595–645.
Martin, S. J., and Drijfhout, F. P. 2009a. How reliable is the analysis of complex cuticular hydrocarbon profiles by multi-variate statistical methods? J. Chem. Ecol. 35:375–382.
Martin, S. J., and Drijfhout, F. P. 2009b. Nest-mate and task cues are influenced and encoded differently within ant cuticular hydrocarbon profiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 35:368–374.
Martin, S. J., Carruthers, J. M., Williams, P. H., and Drijfhout, F. P. 2010. Host specific social parasites (Psithyrus) indicate chemical recognition system in bumblebees. J. Chem. Ecol. 36:855–863.
Nelson, D. R., Dillwith, J. W., and Blomquist, G. J. 1981. Cuticular hydrocarbons of the housefly, Musca domestica. Insect Biochem. 11:187–197.
Noorman, N., and den Otter, C. J. 2002. Effects of relative humidity, temperature, and population density on production of cuticular hydrocarbons in housefly Musca domestica L. J. Chem. Ecol. 28:1819–1829.
Nunes, T. M., Turatti, I. C. C., Lopes, N. P., and Zucchi, R. 2009. Chemical signals in the stingless bee, Frieseomelitta varia, indicate caste, gender, age, and reproductive status. J. Chem. Ecol. 35:1172–1180.
Panek, L. M., Gamboa, G. J., and Espelie, K. E. 2001. The effect of a wasp’s age on its cuticular hydrocarbon profile and its tolerance by nestmate and non-nestmate conspecifics (Polistes fuscatus, Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Ethology 107:55–63.
Seeley, T. D., and Seeley, T. D. 1995. The Wisdom of the Hive: The Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Sevala, V. L., Bagneres, A. G., Kuenzli, M., Blomquist, G. J., and Schal, C. 2000. Cuticular hydrocarbons of the dampwood termite, Zootermopsis nevadensis: Caste differences and role of lipophorin in transport of hydrocarbons and hydrocarbon metabolites. J. Chem. Ecol. 26:765–789.
Wagner, D., Brown, M. J. F., Broun, P., Cuevas, W., Moses, L. E., Chao, D. L., and Gordon, D. M. 1998. Task-related differences in the cuticular hydrocarbon composition of harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex barbatus. J. Chem. Ecol. 24:2021–2037.
Wagner, D., Tissot, M., and Gordon, D. 2001. Task-related environment alters the cuticular hydrocarbon composition of harvester ants. J. Chem. Ecol. 27:1805–1819.
Wyatt, T. D. 2003. Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Roger Butlin of the University of Sheffield and two anonymous reviewers for detailed comments on the manuscript. Funding was provided by the BBSRC grant number BB/G017077/1 and the East Anglian Beekeepers as part of the EARS project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kather, R., Drijfhout, F.P. & Martin, S.J. Task Group Differences in Cuticular Lipids in the Honey Bee Apis mellifera . J Chem Ecol 37, 205–212 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-011-9909-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-011-9909-4