Abstract
The larva of the hoverfly Microdon mutabilis is a specialist social parasite of the ant Formica lemani that is adapted to local groups of F. lemani colonies but mal-adapted to colonies of the same species situated only a few hundred meters away. At a study site in Ireland, F. lemani shares its habitat with four other ant species. All nest under stones, making the oviposition choice by M. mutabilis females crucial to offspring survival. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that, as an extreme specialist, M. mutabilis should respond to cues derived from its host rather than from its microenvironment, a phenomenon that has hitherto only been addressed in the context of herbivorous insects and their parasitoids. In behavioral assays, M. mutabilis females reacted to volatiles from F. lemani colonies by extending their ovipositors, presumably probing for an oviposition substrate. This behavior was not observed toward negative controls or volatiles from colonies of Myrmica scabrinodis, the host ant of the closely related Microdon myrmicae. Coupled gas chromatography-electroantennography (GC-EAG) that used antennal preparations of M. mutabilis located a single physiologically active compound within an extract of heads of F. lemani workers. Coupled GC-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) tentatively identified the compound as a methylated methylsalicylate. GC co-injection of the extract with authentic samples showed that of the four possible isomers (methyl 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-methylsalicylate), only methyl 6-methylsalicylate co-eluted with the EAG-active peak. Furthermore, the response to methyl 6-methylsalicylate was four times higher than to those of the other isomers. Coupled GC-EAG and GC-MS also revealed physiological responses to two constituents, 3-octanone and 3-octanol, of the M. scabrinodis alarm pheromone. However, the behavioral trials did not reveal any behavior that could be attributed to these compounds. Results are discussed in the context of four phases of host location behavior, and of the characteristics, which volatile cues should provide to be useful for an extreme specialist such as M. mutabilis.





Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Al Abassi, S., Birkett, M. A., Petterson, J., Pickett, J. A., Wadhams, L. J., and Woodcock, C. M. 2001. Response of the ladybird parasitoid Dinocampus coccinellae to toxic alkaloids from the seven-spot ladybird, Coccinella septempunctata. J. Chem. Ecol. 27:33–43.
Attygalle, A. B., Billen, J. P. J., Jackson, B. D., and Morgan, E. D. 1990. Morphology and Chemical Contents of Dufour Glands of Pseudomyrmex Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Z. Naturforsch. 45:691–697.
Cammerts, M. C., Attygalle, A. B., Evershed, R. P., and Morgan, E. D. 1985. The pheromonal activity of chiral 3-Octanol for Myrmica ants. Physiol. Ent. 10:33–36.
Cammerts, M. C., Evershed, R. P., and Morgan, E. D. 1981. Comparative study of the mandibular gland secretion of 4 species of Myrmica ants. J. Insect Physiol. 27:225–231.
Cammerts, M. C., Evershed, R. P., and Morgan, E. D. 1982. Mandibular gland secretions of workers of Myrmica rugulosa and Myrmica schencki—Comparison with 4 other Myrmica species. Physiol. Ent. 7:119–125.
Cammerts, M. C., Evershed, R. P., and Morgan, E. D. 1983. The volatile components of the mandibular gland secretion of workers of the ants Myrmica lobicornis and Myrmica sulcinodis. J. Insect Physiol. 29:659–664.
Cortesero, A. M., De Moraes, C. M., Stapel, J. O., Tumlinson, J. H., and Lewis, W. J. 1997. Comparisons and contrasts in host-foraging strategies of two larval parasitoids with different degrees of host specificity. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:1589–1606.
De Moraes, C. M., and Mescher, M. C. 2005. Intrinsic competition between larval parasitoids with different degrees of host specificity. Ecol. Ent. 30:564–570.
Dicke, M., Lenteren, J. C., Boskamp, G. J. F., and Voorst, R. 1985. Intensification and prolongation of host searching in Leptopilina heterotoma (Thomson)(Hymenoptera: Eucoilidae) through a kairomone produced by Drosophila melanogaster. J. Chem. Ecol. 11:125–136.
Du, Y., Poppy, G. M., Powell, W., Pickett, J. A., Wadhams, L. J., and Woodcock, C. M. 1998. Identification of semiochemicals released during aphid feeding that attract the parasitoid Aphidius ervi. J. Chem. Ecol. 24:1355–1368.
Duffield, R. M., and Blum, M. S. 1975. Methyl 6-methyl salicylate: Identification and function in a ponerine ant (Gnamptogenys pleurodon). CMLS. 31:466–466.
Elmes, G. W., Barr, B., Thomas, J. A., and Clarke, R. T. 1999. Extreme host specificity by Microdon mutabilis (Diptera: Syrphidae), a social parasite of ants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 266:447–453.
Elmes, G. W., Thomas, J. A., and Wardlaw, J. C. 1991. Larvae of Maculinea rebeli, a Large Blue Butterfly, and their Myrmica host ants—Wild adoption and behavior in ant nests. J. Zool. 223:447–460.
Feener, D. H., Jacobs, L. F., and Schmidt, J. O. 1996. Specialized parasitoid attracted to a pheromone of ants. Anim. Behav. 51:61–66.
Gardner, M. G., Schönrogge, K., Elmes, G. W., and Thomas, J. A. 2007. Increased genetic diversity as a defence against parasites is undermined by social parasites: Microdon mutabilis hoverflies infesting Formica lemani ant colonies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond.B. 274:103–110.
Godfray, H. C. J. 1994. Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
Griffith, D. C., and Pickett, J. A. 1980. A potential application of aphid alarm pheromones. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 27:199–201.
Hölldobler, B. 1969. Host Finding by odor in the myrmecophilic beetle Atemeles pubicollis Bris.(Staphylinidae). Science. 166:757–758.
Hölldobler, B. 1970. Zur Physiologie der Gast-Wirt-Beziehungen (Myrmecophilie) bei Ameisen. II. Das Gastverhäiltnis des imaginalen Atemeles pubicollis Bris.(Col, Staphylinidae) zu Myrmica und Formica (Hym. Formicidae). Z. Vergl. Physiol. 66:176–189.
Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O. 1990. The ants. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Jaffe, K., and Sanchez, C. 1984. On the nestmate recognition system and territorial marking behavior in the ant Camponotus rufipes. Insectes Soc. 31:302–315.
Maddrell, S. H. P. 1969. Secretion by the malpighian tubules of Rhodnius. The movements of ions and water. J. Exp. Biol. 51:71–97.
Morehead, S. A. 2001. Geographic variation in host location cues for a dipteran parasitoid of Paraponera clavata. Biotropica. 33:495–501.
Morehead, S. A., and Feener, D. H. 2000. Visual and chemical cues used in host location and acceptance by a dipteran parasitoid. J. Insect Behav. 13:613–625.
Morehead, S. A., Seger, J., Feener, D. H., and Brown, B. V. 2001. Evidence for a cryptic species complex in the ant parasitoid Apocephalus paraponerae (Diptera: Phoridae). Evol. Ecol. Res. 3:273–284.
Morgan, E. D., Inwood, M. R., and Cammerts, M. C. 1978. Mandibular gland secretion of the ant Myrmica scabrinodis. Physiol. Entomol. 3::107–114.
Musche, M., Anton, C., Worgan, A., and Settele, J. 2006. No experimental evidence for host ant related oviposition in a parasitic butterfly. J. Insect Behav. 19:631–643.
Orr, M. R., De Camargo, R. X., and Benson, W. W. 2003. Interactions between ant species increase arrival rates of an ant parasitoid. Anim. Behav. 65:1187–1193.
Pickett, J. A. 1990. GC-MS in insect pheromone identification: three extreme case histories, pp. 299–309, in A. R. McCaffery, and I.D. Wilson (eds.). Chromatography and Isolation of Insect Hormones and PheromonesPlenum Press, New York and London.
Powell, W., and Pickett, J. A. 2003. Manipulation of parasitoids for aphid pest management: progress and prospects. Pest Manag. Sci. 59:149–155.
Sadeghi, H., and Gilbert, F. 2000. Oviposition preferences of aphidophagous hoverflies. Ecol. Entomol. 25:91–100.
Schönrogge, K., Wardlaw, J. C., Thomas, J. A., and Elmes, G. W. 2000. Polymorphic growth rates in myrmecophilous insects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 267:771–777.
Schönrogge, K., Barr, B., Wardlaw, J. C., Napper, E. K. V., Gardner, M. G., Breen, J., Elmes, G. W., and Thomas, J. A. 2002. When rare species become endangered: cryptic speciation in myrmecophilous hoverflies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 75:291–300.
Schönrogge, K., Gardner, M. G., Elmes, G. W., Napper, E. K. V., Simcox, D. J., Wardlaw, J. C., Breen, J., Knapp, J. J., Pickett, J. A., and Thomas, J. A. 2006. Host propagation permits extreme local adaptation in a social parasite of ants. Ecol. Lett. 9:1032–1040.
Sutherland, J. P., Sullivan, M. S., and Poppy, G. M. 2001. Oviposition behavior and host colony size discrimination in Episyrphus balteatus (Diptera: Syrphidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 91:411–417.
Thomas, J. A., and Elmes, G. W. 2001. Food-plant niche selection rather than the presence of ant nests explains oviposition patterns in the myrmecophilous butterfly genus Maculinea. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 268:471–477.
Torres, J. A., Snelling, R. R., Blum, M. S., Flournoy, R. C., Jones, T. H., and Duffield, R. M. 2001. Mandibular gland chemistry of four Caribbean species of Camponotus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 29:673–680.
Van Alphen, J. J. M., and Visser, M. E. 1990. Superparasitism as an adaptive strategy for insect parasitoids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35:59–79.
Van Dyck, H., Oostermeijer, J. G. B., Talloen, W., Feenstra, V., Van der HiddeA., and Wynhoff, I. 2000. Does the presence of ant nests matter for oviposition to a specialized myrmecophilous Maculinea butterfly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 267:861–866.
Vet, L. E. M., and Dicke, M. 1992. Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37:141–172.
Vet, L. E. M., Sokolowski, M. B., Macdonald, D. E., and Snellen, H. 1993. Responses of a generalist and a specialist parasitoid (Hymenoptera, Eucoilidae) to drosophilid larval kairomones. J. Insect Behav. 6:615–624.
Wadhams, L. J., Angst, M. E., and Blight, M. M. 1982. Responses of the olfactory receptors of Scolytus scolytus to the stereoisomeres of 4-methyl-3-heptanol. J. Chem. Ecol. 8:477–492.
Wadhams, L. J. 1990. The use of coupled gas chromatography: electrophysiological techniques in the identification of insect pheromones, pp, pp. 289–298, in A.R. McCaffery, and I. D. Wilson (eds.). Chromatography and Isolation of Insect Hormones and PheromonesPlenum Press, New York and London.
Acknowledgments
We thank Judith Wardlaw for help with rearing and maintenance of ant colonies, and two anonymous referees for helpful comments. This work was partly funded by NERC (GR3/12662) and partly by the EU FP V project MacMan (EVK2-CT-2001-00126). Rothamsted Research receives grant-aided support from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council of the UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schönrogge, K., Napper, E.K.V., Birkett, M.A. et al. Host Recognition by the Specialist Hoverfly Microdon mutabilis, a Social Parasite of the Ant Formica lemani . J Chem Ecol 34, 168–178 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-007-9417-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-007-9417-8