Skip to main content
Log in

Thorpe tube and oxygen flow restrictor: what’s flow accuracy?

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oxygen gas flowmeters (OGF) are used to regulate the oxygen flow in acute and chronic care. In hospitals, Thorpe tubes (TT) are the classical systems most used for delivering oxygen. In recent years, the oxygen flow restrictor (OFR) has appeared. These devices use a series of calibrated openings in a disk that can be adjusted to deliver different flow rates. These devices have a reputation for delivering more accurate oxygen flow rates compared to classical OGFs. However, to our knowledge, few study has examined this supposition. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the accuracy and precision of the ready-to-use TTs and OFRs. OGFs were selected from hospitals in Belgium and France. Before performing the flow measurements, the inlet pressure was checked. The accuracy of the OGF was analyzed with a calibrated thermal mass flowmeter (RED Y COMPACT™ GCM—0 to 20 L/min—VÖGTLIN Instruments). Different flows (2, 4, 6, 9 or 12 L/min) were evaluated. Linear regression analysis, bias (with confidence interval) and lower and upper limit of the agreement were calculated for TTs and OFRs. All measurements are expressed in absolute values. Four-hundred-seventy-six TTs and 96 OFRs were analyzed. The intra-class correlation coefficient calculated for the calibrated thermal mass flowmeter was > 0.99 and reflected the excellent reliability of our measurements. For TTs, the bias value was − 0.24 L/min (± 0.88), and the limits of agreement were − 1.97 to 1.48 L/min. For OFRs, the bias value was − 0.30 L/min (± 0.54), and the limits of agreement were − 1.36 to 0.77 L/min. As the flow increased, the accuracy of all analyzed OGFs decreased. With the increasing flow, some data fell outside the limits of agreement, and the trend increased with the elevated oxygen flow. TTs were less accurate compared to OFRs due to the increased flow variability. However, for TTs and OFRs, as the required flow is elevated, the dispersion of values increases on both sides of the actual flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pavlov N, Haynes AG, Stucki A, Jüni P, Ott SR. Long-term oxygen therapy in COPD patients: population-based cohort study on mortality. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018;13:979–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cairo J, Pilbeam S. Mosby’s respiratory care equipment. Amsteram: Elsevier; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duprez F. Accuracy of medical oxygen flow meters: a multicentric field study. Health. 6(15):1978–83; 2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Duprez F, Michotte JB, Cuvelier G, Legrand A, Mashayekhi S, Reychler G. Accuracy of oxygen flow delivered by compressed-gas cylinders in hospital and prehospital emergency care. Respir Care. 2018;63(3):332–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davidson J, Gazzeta C, Torres LC, Jardim JR, Nascimento OA. Precision and accuracy of oxygen flow meters used at hospital settings. Respir Care. 2012;57(7):1071–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stub D, Smith K, Bernard S, Bray JE, Stephenson M, Cameron P, et al. A randomized controlled trial of oxygen therapy in acute myocardial infarction air verses oxygen in myocardial infarction study (AVOID study). Am Heart J. 2012;163(3):339.e1–45.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hafner S, Beloncle F, Koch A, Radermacher P, Asfar P. Hyperoxia in intensive care, emergency, and peri-operative medicine: Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde? A 2015 update. Ann Intensive Care. 2015;5(1):42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet Lond Engl. 1986;1(8476):307–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2):135–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lamb K, Piper D. Southmedic OxyMaskTM compared with the Hudson RCI® non-rebreather MaskTM: safety and performance comparison. Can J Respir Ther CJRT, Rev Can Thér Respir RCTR. 2016;52(1):13–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Benaron DA, Benitz WE. Maximizing the stability of oxygen delivered via nasal cannula. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994;148(3):294–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Frat J-P, Thille AW, Mercat A, Girault C, Ragot S, Perbet S, et al. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(23):2185–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Duprez F, Mashayekhi S, Cuvelier G, Legrand A, Reychler G. A New formula for predicting the fraction of delivered oxygen during low-flow oxygen therapy. Respir Care. 2018;63(12):1528–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Walsh M, Engle W, Laptook A, Kazzi SNJ, Buchter S, Rasmussen M, et al. Oxygen delivery through nasal cannulae to preterm infants: can practice be improved? Pediatrics. 2005;116(4):857–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Finer NN, Bates R, Tomat P. Low flow oxygen delivery via nasal cannula to neonates. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996;21(1):48–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Susanto C, Thomas PS. Assessing the use of initial oxygen therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a retrospective audit of pre-hospital and hospital emergency management. Intern Med J. 2015;45(5):510–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jubran A. Pulse oximetry. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2015;19:272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Driscoll BR, Howard LS, Bucknall C, Welham SA, Davison AG, British Thoracic Society. British Thoracic Society emergency oxygen audits. Thorax. 66(8):734–5; 2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédéric Duprez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article is a bench study, there are no human people involved.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duprez, F., Dubois, A., Ollieuz, S. et al. Thorpe tube and oxygen flow restrictor: what’s flow accuracy?. J Clin Monit Comput 35, 337–341 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00476-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00476-0

Keywords

Navigation