Skip to main content
Log in

Is pulse oximetry an essential tool or just another distraction? The role of the pulse oximeter in modern anesthesia care

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the discovery of anesthetic agents, patient monitoring has been considered one of the core responsibilities of the anesthesiologist. As depicted in Robert Hinckley’s famous painting, The First Operation with Ether, one observes William Thomas Green Morton carefully watching over his patient. Since its founding in 1905, ‘Vigilance’ has been the motto of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). Over a hundred years have passed, and one would think we would be clear regarding what we are watching for and how we should be watching. On the contrary, the introduction of new technology and outcome research is requiring us to re-examine our fundamental assumptions regarding what is and what is not important in the care of the patient. A vast majority of anesthesiologists would refuse to proceed with an anesthetic without the presence of a pulse oximeter. On the other hand, outcome studies have failed to demonstrate an improvement in patient care with their use. For that matter, it can be argued that outcome studies have yet to demonstrate an unambiguous role for any monitor of any type (i.e. blood pressure cuff or ECG), as outcome studies may fail to capture rare events. Because of the increased safety that has been attributed to pulse oximetry, it is unlikely that further studies can or will be conducted. As we enter a new era of clinical monitoring, with an emphasis on noninvasive cardiovascular monitoring, it might be of benefit to examine the role of the pulse oximeter in clinical care. This article reviews the available evidence for pulse oximetry. Further, it discusses contemporary issues, events, and perceptions that may help to explain how and why pulse oximetry may have been adopted as a standard of care despite the lack of supportive. Lastly, it discusses less obvious benefits of pulse oximetry that may have further implications on the future of anesthesia care and perhaps even automated anesthesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mannheimer P. The light-tissue interaction of pulse oximetry. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(6):S10–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aoyagi T. Pulse oximetry: its invention, theory, and future. J Anesth. 2003;17(4):259–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barash P, et al. Clin Anesth. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wukitsch MW. Pulse oximetry: historical review and Ohmeda functional analysis. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1987;4:161–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Merry A. Role of anesthesiologists in WHO safe surgery programs. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2010;48(2):137–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thoms G, McHugh GA, O’Sullivan E. The global oximetry initiative. Anaesthesia. 2007;62(s1):75–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tinker J, et al. Role of monitoring devices in prevention of anesthetic mishaps: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 1989;71:541–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eichhorn J. Prevention of intraoperative anesthesia accidents and related severe injury through safety monitoring. Anesthesiology. 1989;70(4):572–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cullen D, et al. Effect of pulse oximetry, age, and ASA physical status on the frequency of patients admitted unexpectedly to a postoperative intensive care unit and the severity of their anesthesia-related complications. Anesth Analg. 1992;74(2):181–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jurban A. Pulse oximetry. Crit Care. 1999;3(2):R11–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Raemer D, et al. Hypoxemia during ambulatory gynecologic surgery as evaluated by the pulse oximeter. J Clin Monit. 1987;3(4):244–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Caplan R, et al. Unexpected cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia: a closed claims analysis of predisposing factors. Anesthesiology. 1988;68:5–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pedersen T, Moller A, Pedersen B. Pulse oximetry for perioperative monitoring: systemic review of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2003;96(2):426–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pedersen T, Hovhannisyan K, Moller A. Pulse oximetry for perioperative monitoring. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, 2009(4).

  15. Moller JT, Jensen PF, Johannessen NW, Espersen K. Hypoxaemia is reduced by pulse oximetry monitoring in the operating theatre and in the recovery room. Br J Anaesth. 1992;68(2):146–150.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moller J, et al. Randomized evaluation of pulse oximetry in 20,802 patients: II. Perioperative events and postoperative complications. Anesthesiology. 1993;78(3):445–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moller J, et al. Randomized evaluation of pulse oximetry in 20,802 patients: I. Design, demography, pulse oximetry failure rate, and overall complication rate. Anesthesiology. 1993;78(3):445–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bierman M, Stein K, Snyder J. Pulse oximetry in the postoperative care of cardiac surgical patients. A randomized controlled trial. Chest. 1992;102(5):1367–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ochroch E, et al. The impact of continuous pulse oximetry monitoring on intensive care unit admissions from a postsurgical care floor. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(3):868–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moller J, et al. Perioperative monitoring with pulse oximetry and late postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Br J Anaesth. 1993;71(3):340–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cooper J, et al. Effects of information feedback and pulse oximetry on the incidence of anesthesia complications. Anesthesiology. 1987;67(5):686–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pierce E. ASA monitoring guidelines: their origin and development. ASA Newsletter 2002;66(9):22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Islam S, Auerbach A. The impact of intraoperative monitoring on patient safety. In: Markowitz A, editor. Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality US Department of Health and Human Services; 2001. p. 265–70.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pierce E. The 34th Rovenstine Lecture: 40 years beind the mask: safety revisited. Anesthesiology. 1996;84(4):965–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith G, Pell J. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Br Med J. 2003;327:1459–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Keats A. The Rovenstine Lecture, 1983: cardiovascular anesthesia: perceptions and perspectives. Anesthesiology. 1984;60(5):467–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Joseph V, Lagasse R. Monitoring and analysis of outcome studies. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2004;42(2):113–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen M, et al. A survey of 112,000 anaesthetics at one teaching hospital. Can J Anesth. 1986;33(1):22–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Petterson M, Begnoche V, Graybeal J. The effect of motion on pulse oximetry and its clinical significance. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(6):s78–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kay J, Neal M. Effect of automatic blood pressure devices on vigilance of anesthesia residents. J Clin Monit Comput. 1986;2(3):148–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Guan Z, Baker K, Sandberg W. Misalignment of disposable pulse oximeter probes results in false saturation readings that influence anesthetic management. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(5):1530–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Agashe G, Coakley J, Mannheimer P. Forehead pulse oximetry: headband use helps alleviate false low readings likely related to venous pulsation artifact. Anesthesiology. 2006;105(6):1075–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shelley K, et al. The effect of venous pulsation on the forehead pulse oximeter wave form as a possible source of error in SpO2 calculation. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:743–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Feiner J, Severinghaus J, Bickler P. Dark skin decreases the accuracy of pulse oximeters at low oxygen saturation: the effects of oximeter probe type and gender. Anesth Analg. 2007;165(65):S18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Reuss J, Siker D. The pulse in reflectance pulse oximetry: modeling and experimental studies. J Clin Monit Comput. 2004;18(4):289–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fu E, et al. Supplemental oxygen impairs detection of hypoventilation by pulse oximetry. Chest. 2004;126(5):1552–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tremper K. Pulse oximetry’s final frontier. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(5):1684–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Silber J, et al. Anesthesiologist direction and patient outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2000;93(1):152–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Heringlake M, et al. Preoperative cerebral oxygen saturation and clinical outcomes in cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2011;114(1):58–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shelley K. Is the automation of anesthesia possible or even desirable? Curr Opin in Anaesthesiol. 2008;21:748–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hemmerling T. Automated anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:757–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirk H. Shelley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shah, A., Shelley, K.H. Is pulse oximetry an essential tool or just another distraction? The role of the pulse oximeter in modern anesthesia care. J Clin Monit Comput 27, 235–242 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-013-9428-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-013-9428-7

Keywords

Navigation