Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

LMX and Attributions of Organizational Citizenship Behavior Motives: When is Citizenship Perceived as Brownnosing?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study tests the potential negative impact of leader-member exchange (LMX) quality on perceptions of followers’ motives to perform organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Based on the OCB motives introduced and tested by Rioux and Penner (Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1306–1314, 2001), structural equation modeling using matched-pair data from follower-leader-coworker triads was used to test a model proposed by (Bowler, Halbesleben, and Paul Human Resource Management Review, 20, 309–316 2010) of the double-bind faced by those in low- or high-quality LMX relationships. Followers have their OCB motives attributed to positive pro-social values and organizational concern motives or, alternatively to, negative impression management motives based solely on the point of view of the observer. The first double-bind occurs in that third-party observers attribute the OCB performance motives of followers in high-quality LMX relationships to impression management motives. This puts high LMX followers in a double-bind in that while performing OCB is encouraged and positive, such behavior is seen as self-serving by coworkers. This can lead to followers being labeled as brownnosers by coworkers, among other descriptors. The second double-bind occurs when employees in low-quality LMX relationships have their OCB attributed negatively by their leader. This makes it difficult for employees to develop LMX with their leader. We discuss the implications of the study and outcomes for future research on LMX and OCB motives along with recommendations for practitioners for handling the potential dark side of LMX relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of self-control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banki, S. (2010). Is a good deed constructive regardless of intent? Organization citizenship behavior, motive, and group outcomes. Small Group Research, 41(3), 354–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B., & Crant, J. M. (2000). Dyadic communication relationships in organizations: An attribution/expectancy approach. Organization Science, 11, 648–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. A. H., & O’Hair, H. D. (2007). Machiavellians’ motives in organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35, 246–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron, D. M. (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizen at what cost? Academy of Management Review, 32, 1078–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron, D., Ostroff, C., Schroeder, T., & Block, C. (2014). The dual effects of organizational citizenship behavior: Relationships to research productivity and career outcomes in academe. Human Performance, 27, 99–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron, D. M., Shipp, A. J., Rosen, B., & Furst, S. A. (2013). Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes: The cost of being a good citizen. Journal of Management, 39, 958–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? Academy of Management Review, 24, 82–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolino, M. C., Varela, J. A., Bande, B., & Turnley, W. H. (2006). The impact of impression-management tactics on supervisor ratings of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., Gilstrap, J. B., & Suazo, M. M. (2010). Citizenship under pressure: What’s a “good soldier” to do? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6), 835–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, W. M., & Brass, D. J. (2006). Relational correlates of interpersonal citizenship behavior: A social network perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 70–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, W. M., Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Paul, J. B. (2010). If you’re close with the leader, you must be a brownnose: The role leader-member relationships in follower, leader, and coworker attributions of organizational citizenship behavior motives. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 309–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. L., & Rusbult, C. E. (2001). Attitude alignment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deluga, R. J. (1994). Supervisor trust building, leader-member exchange, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 316–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deluga, R. J., & Perry, J. T. (1994). The role of subordinate performance and ingratiation in leader-member exchanges. Group and Organization Management, 19, 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockery, T. M., & Steiner, D. D. (1990). The role of the initial interaction in leader-member exchange. Group and Organization Studies, 15, 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donia, M. B., Johns, G., & Raja, U. (2016). Good soldier or good actor? Supervisor accuracy in distinguishing between selfless and self-serving OCB motives. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1–10.

  • Eastman, K. K. (1994). In the eyes of the beholder: An attributional approach to ingratiation and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1379–1391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eissa, G.M. (2012). The dysfunctional citizen: an organizational citizenship behavior: the effects of application of the conservation of resources theory, ethical values, justice, and organizational to investigate the dark side of organizational commitment. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, USA.

  • Feldman, J. M. (1986). A note on the statistical correction of halo error. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G. R., Bhawuk, D. P. S., Fedor, D. B., & Judge, T. A. (1995). Organizational politics and citizenship: Attributions of intentionality and construct definition. In M. J. Martinko (Ed.), Advances in attribution theory: An organizational perspective (pp. 231–252). DelRay Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G. R., Adams, G., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ammeter, A. P. (2002). Perceptions of organizational politics: Theory and research directions. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues (pp. 179–254). Oxford, U.K.: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1984). On the meaning of within-factor correlated measurement errors. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 572–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the pro-social fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 48–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., Ashton-James, C., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2007). Social comparison processes in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 22–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, R., Farh, J. L., Song, L., & Lapierre, L. (2003). LMX and organizational citizenship behavior: Examining the links within and across Western and Chinese samples. Dealing with diversity. Volume in LMX Leadership: The Series: 219–263. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

  • Hackett, R. D., & Lapierre, L. M. (2004). A meta-analytical explanation of the relationship between LMX and OCB. Academy of Management Proceedings (Meeting Abstract Supplement), T1-T6.

  • Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Bowler, W. M. (2007). Emotional exhaustion and job performance: The mediating role of motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 93–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halbesleben, J. R. B., Bowler, W. M., Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2010). Organizational concern, prosocial values, or impression management? How supervisors attribute motives to organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1450–1489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Klayman, J. (1998). Cognitive repairs: How organizations compensate for the shortcoming of individual learners. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M., & Hall-Merenda, K. (1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 680–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 269–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, C., & Hackett, R.D. (2007). The effects of LMX on employee conceptualizations and display of OCB In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2007, No. 1, pp. 1-6). Academy of Management.

  • Jones, E. E. (1964). Ingratiation. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Wortman, C. B. (1973). Ingratiation: An attributional approach. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., O’Neill, J. W., & Cho, H. M. (2010). When does an employee not help coworkers? The effect of leader–member exchange on employee envy and organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(3), 530–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lapierre, L. M., & Hackett, R. D. (2007). Trait conscientiousness, leader-member exchange, job satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviour: A test of an integrative model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(3), 539–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24, 43–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, M. C., Ramayah, T., & Hui, J. K. S. (2006). An investigation of leader-member-exchange effects on organizational citizenship behavior in Malaysia. Journal of Business and Management, 12, 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. (2016). Leader–member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 67–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its true nature, antecedents, and consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, W. G., & Smith, R. H. (1993). Distinguishing the experiences of envy and jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rioux, S. M., & Penner, L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1306–1314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. J. (2001). Moral reasoning as a determinant of organizational citizenship behaviors: A study in the public accounting profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 219–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzmuller, M., Van Dyne, L., & Ilies, R. (2008). Organizational citizenship behavior: A review and extension of its nomological network. In J. Barling (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of organizational behavior, Micro approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 106–123). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1972). Some developments in European social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2(3), 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. E. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Hoobler, J., & Ensley, M. D. (2004). Moderators of the relationships between coworkers’ organizational citizenship behavior and fellow employees’ attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error on psychological rating (pp. 25–29). IV: Journal of Applied Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L. I. N. N., & Ellis, J. B. (2004). Job creep: A reactance theory perspective on organizational citizenship behavior as over-fulfillment of obligations. The employment relationship: Examining psychological and contextual perspectives, 181–205.

  • Vecchio, R. (2005). Explorations in employee envy: Feeling envious and feeling envied. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vonk, R. (2002). Self-serving interpretations of flattery: Why ingratiation works. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S. L., & Rush, M. C. (2000). Altruistic organizational citizenship behavior: Context, disposition, and age. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 379–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers' performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 420–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, S. J., & Green, S. A. (1993). The effects of leader-member exchange on employee citizenship and impression management behavior. Human Relations, 46, 1431–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, A. R., Shanine, K. K., Leon, M. R., & Whitman, M. V. (2014). Student-recruited samples in organizational research: A review, analysis, and guidelines for future research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. T. P., & Weiner, B. (1981). When people ask “why” questions, and the heuristics of attributional search. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 650–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Interpersonal trust and attitudes towards human nature. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 373–412). New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management; Spears School of Business, Oklahoma State University, 320A Business Building, Stillwater, AL, 74078-4011, USA

    Wm. Matthew Bowler & Jeffrey B. Paul

  2. Department of Health Care Management; Culverhouse College of Commerce, The University of Alabama, 361 Stadium Dr, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA

    Jonathon R. Halbesleben

Authors
  1. Wm. Matthew Bowler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeffrey B. Paul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jonathon R. Halbesleben
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey B. Paul.

Additional information

Wm. Matthew Bowler and Jeffrey B. Paul are first authors and contributed equally to the project but only one can be listed first.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bowler, W.M., Paul, J.B. & Halbesleben, J.R. LMX and Attributions of Organizational Citizenship Behavior Motives: When is Citizenship Perceived as Brownnosing?. J Bus Psychol 34, 139–152 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9526-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9526-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation