Abstract
As one component of a functional behavioral assessment, descriptive assessments (DA) can help determine the maintaining variable of a student’s problem behavior in school. School districts often employ board-certified behavior analysts as consultants to conduct DAs by observing a student and recording the environmental variables surrounding problem behavior. However, consultants may have to rely on school personnel to conduct DAs due to environmental constraints. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which 18 school staff accurately collected DA data with two types of recording formats, narrative and structured, prior to and after receiving a group training that consisted of verbal review and group feedback. Results based on visual analysis indicate that (a) 4 participants engaged in high levels of accurate, narrative DA recording in baseline; (b) 10 of 14 participants reached mastery criteria after training for both narrative and structured DA recording formats; and (c) 4 participants did not reach mastery criteria after training for either recording format. Despite sub-mastery performance by some participants, supplemental statistical analyses and visual inspection indicate that the group training improved all participants’ accuracy from baseline. These findings have important implications for training school staff members to collect DA data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, J. L., Ayres, K. M., & Smith, K. A. (2015). Training teachers in evidence-based practice for individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A review of the literature. Teacher Education and Special Education, 38, 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406414544551.
Anderson, C. M., Rodriguez, B. J., & Campbell, A. (2015). Functional behavior assessment in schools: Current status and future directions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24, 338–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-015-9226-z.
Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2016). BACB professional and ethical compliance code for behavior analysts. Retrieved October 25, 2017, from https://www.bacb.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/170706-compliance-code-english.pdf.
Beavers, G. A., Iwata, B. A., & Lerman, D. C. (2013). Thirty years of research on the functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.30.
Carter, E., O’Rourke, L., Sisco, L. G., & Pelsue, D. (2009). Knowledge, responsibilities, and training needs of paraprofessionals in elementary and secondary schools. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508324399.
Griffin-Shirley, N., & Matlock, D. (2004). Paraprofessionals speak out: A survey. Review: Rehabilitation and Education in Blindness and Visual Impairments, 36, 127–136.
Gulamhussein, A. (2013). Teaching the teachers: Effective professional development in an era of high stakes accountability. Retrieved from The Center for Public Education website: http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/Main-Menu/Staffingstudents/Teaching-the-Teachers-Effective-Professional-Development-in-an-Era-of-High-Stakes-Accountability/Teaching-the-Teachers-Full-Report.pdf.
Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 147–185. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2003.36-147.
Hanley, G. P., Jin, C. S., Vanselow, N. R., & Hanratty, L. A. (2014). Producing meaningful improvements in problem behavior of children with autism via synthesized analyses and treatments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.106.
Hogan, A., Knez, N., & Kahng, S. (2015). Evaluating the use of behavioral skills training to improve school staffs’ implementation of behavior intervention plans. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24, 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-014-9213-9.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Dorsey, M. F., Zarcone, J. R., Vollmer, T. R., Smith, R. G., et al. (1994). The functions of self-injurious behavior: An experimental-epidemiological analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1994.27-215.
Lanovaz, M. J., Argumedes, M., Roy, D., Duquette, J. R., & Watkins, N. (2013). Using ABC narrative recording to identify the function of problem behavior: A pilot study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 2734–2742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.05.038.
Lerman, D. C., Hovanetz, A., Strobel, M., & Tetreault, A. (2009). Accuracy of teacher-collected descriptive analysis data: A comparison of narrative and structured recording formats. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-009-9084-7.
Menendez, A. L., Mayton, M. R., & Yurick, A. L. (2017). Board certified behavior analysts and related ethical and professional practice considerations for rural schools. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 36, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517703397.
National Research Council. (2001). Educating children with autism. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Oliver, A. C., Pratt, L. A., & Normand, M. P. (2015). A survey of functional behavior assessment methods used by behavior analysts in practice. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 817–829. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.256.
Pence, S. T., Peter, C. C. S., & Giles, A. F. (2014). Teacher acquisition of functional analysis methods using pyramidal training. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23, 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-013-9182-4.
Pence, S. T., Roscoe, E. M., Bourret, J. C., & Ahearn, W. H. (2009). Relative contributions of three descriptive methods: Implications for behavioral assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-425.
Rosales, R., Gongola, L., & Homlitas, C. (2015). An evaluation of video modeling with embedded instructions to teach implementation of stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.174.
Roscoe, E. M., Phillips, K. M., Kelly, M. A., Farber, R., & Dube, W. V. (2015). A statewide survey assessing practitioners’ use and perceived utility of functional assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 830–844. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.259.
Severtson, J. M., & Carr, J. E. (2012). Training novice instructors to implement errorless discrete-trial teaching: A sequential analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5(2), 13–23.
Shayne, R., & Miltenberger, R. G. (2013). Evaluation of behavioral skills training for teaching functional assessment and treatment selection skills to parents. Behavioral Interventions, 28, 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1350.
Sloman, K. N. (2010). Research trends in descriptive analysis. The Behavior Analyst Today, 11, 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100686.
Thompson, R. H., & Borrero, J. C. (2011). Direct observation. In W. W. Fisher, C. C. Piazza, & H. S. Roane (Eds.) Handbook of applied behavior analysis (pp. 191–205). New York: The Guilford Press.
Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W. Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. L. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Issues & answers. REL 2007-No. 033. Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest (NJ1).
Acknowledgements
We would also like to thank research assistants, Tiffany Haeussler and Bailey Williams, for assisting the authors with intercoder agreement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Human and Animal Rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Operational Definitions for Students
Aggression (A) any instance of biting, hitting, scratching, kicking, pushing, shoving, hair pulling, pinching, head butting.
Self-injurious behavior (SIB) any instance of contact with their own body with an open or closed hand, including head hitting and biting.
Disruption (D) any instance of a person throwing an object, swiping objects, tearing, ripping, turning over furniture.
Inappropriate vocalization (IV) any vocalization that is above conversational level, any instance using derogatory language, or making threats to cause harm to another person or to property.
Definitions of Antecedent Events
No attention/low attention (LA) 3 or more seconds without vocal or physical interaction from another person.
Restricted access (RA) the removal of any item that the student was previously allowed to manipulate or consume or when the student is denied access to requested items.
Demand (DE) any vocal, model, gestural, or physical prompts to engage in a behavior or the presence on ongoing instructional activity.
Definitions of Consequence Events
Attention (ATT) person vocally or physically interacting with the student including reprimands (e.g., “No, stop doing that!”) and redirection statements to appropriate behavior, task, or another activity.
Access to materials (ACC) a change in the environment in which presentation of materials that were previously requested are withheld.
Escape (ESC) the removal of demand and instructional materials or the absence of any prompting if the student stops engaging in the task for at least 3 s.
Appendix 3
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luna, O., Petri, J.M., Palmier, J. et al. Comparing Accuracy of Descriptive Assessment Methods Following a Group Training and Feedback. J Behav Educ 27, 488–508 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9297-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9297-8