Abstract
This study examined the use of an instructional package consisting of structured criteria, extrastimulus prompts, prompt delay, and reinforcement contingencies to improve decision making based on visual analysis of case-study (A/B) design data. Four participants without backgrounds in behavior analysis received training under two experimental conditions: first, a prompt-delay-plus-accuracy-reward condition and then a prompt-delay-plus-accuracy-and-latency-reward condition. A multiple-baseline-across-participants design was used to evaluate the impact of the instructional package on decision accuracy, response speed, and decision types. Results demonstrated that all participants made substantial improvements in decision accuracy as a function of the instructional package. Gains were highest for three participants who relied on prompts and developed mastery in the prompt-delay-plus-accuracy-reward condition. Generalization to unprompted conditions for all participants was immediate and maintained 1 week after training was concluded. Results are discussed in terms of behavioral mechanisms that appeared to control decision making during instruction, practical applications to applied settings, and needs for future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychological Association. (2005). Report of the 2005 presidential task force on evidence-based practice. Retrieved June 1, 2014, from http://www.apa.org/practice/resources/evidence/evidence-based-report.pdf
Baer, D. M. (1977). Perhaps it would be better not to know everything. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 167–172. doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-167.
Bailey, D. B. (1984). Effects of lines of progress and semilogarithmic charts on ratings of charted data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 359–365. doi:10.1901/jaba.1984.17-359.
Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2005). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Cone, J. D. (2001). Evaluating outcomes: Empirical tools for effective practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10384-000.
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill-Prentice Hall.
DeProspero, A., & Cohen, S. (1979). Inconsistent visual analyses of intrasubject data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 573–579. doi:10.1901/jaba.1979.12-573.
Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., & Ault, M. J. (1990). Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompts in teaching preschoolers with developmental delays. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 11, 1–22. doi:10.1016/0891-4222(90)90002-P.
Fisher, W. W., Kelley, M. E., & Lomas, J. E. (2003). Visual aids and structured criteria for improving inspection and interpretation of single-case designs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 387–406. doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-387.
Gibson, G., & Ottenbacher, K. (1988). Characteristics influencing the visual analysis of single-subject data: An empirical analysis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 24, 298–314. doi:10.1177/0021886388243007.
Hagopian, L. P., Fisher, W. W., Thompson, R. H., Owen-DeSchryver, J., Iwata, B. A., & Wacker, D. P. (1997). Toward the development of structured criteria for interpretation of functional analysis data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 313–326. doi:10.1901/jaba.1997.30-313.
Harbst, K. B., Ottenbacher, K. J., & Harris, S. R. (1991). Interrater reliability of therapists’ judgments of graphed data. Physical Therapy, 71, 107–115. Retrieved from http://ptjournal.apta.org/content/71/2/107
Huitema, B. E. (1985). Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: A myth. Behavioral Assessment, 7, 107–118.
Johnston, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1993). Strategies and tactics of behavioral research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jones, R. R., Weinrott, M. R., & Vaught, R. S. (1978). Effects of serial dependency on the agreement between visual and statistical inference. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 277–283. doi:10.1901/jaba.1978.11-277.
Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford Press.
Matyas, T. A., & Greenwood, K. M. (1990). Visual analysis of single-case time series: Effects of variability, serial dependence, and magnitude of intervention effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 341–351. doi:10.1901/jaba.1990.23-341.
Michael, J. (1974). Statistical inference for individual organism research: Mixed blessing or curse? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 647–653. doi:10.1901/jaba.1974.7-647.
Miltenberger, R. G. (2011). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson.
Parker, R. I., & Hagan-Burke, S. (2007). Single case research results as clinical outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 637–653.
Parsonson, B. S., & Baer, D. M. (1992). The visual analysis of data, and current research into the stimuli controlling it. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis (pp. 187–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York, NY: Free Press.
Skiba, R., Deno, S. L., Marston, D., & Casey, A. (1989). Influence of trend estimation and subject familiarity on practitioners’ judgments of intervention effectiveness. The Journal of Special Education, 22, 433–446. doi:10.1177/002246698902200405.
Spring, B. (2007). Evidence-based practice in clinical psychology: What it is, why it matters; what you need to know. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63, 611–631. doi:10.1002/jclp.20373.
Stewart, K. K., Carr, J. E., Brandt, C. W., & McHenry, M. M. (2007). An evaluation of the conservative dual-criterion method for teaching university students to visually inspect AB-design graphs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 713–718. doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.713-718.
Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367. doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349.
Stokes, T. F., & Osnes, P. G. (1989). An operant pursuit of generalization. Behavior Therapy, 20, 337–355. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(89)80054-1.
Wampold, B. E., & Bhati, K. S. (2004). Attending to the omissions: A historical examination of evidence-based practice movements. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 563–570. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.35.6.563.
Wolery, M., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Effective and efficient procedures for the transfer of stimulus control. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4, 52–77. doi:10.1177/027112148400400305.
Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., Cybriwsky, C., Doyle, P. M., Schuster, J. W., Ault, M. J., & Gast, D. L. (1992). Constant time delay with discrete responses: A review of effectiveness and demographic, procedural, and methodological parameters. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13, 239–266. doi:10.1016/0891-4222(92)90028-5.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Tyler Smith, Mackenzie Sommerhalder, Whitney Strong, Alicia Kruger, and Natalie Hoff for their assistance with this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was completed as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the first author’s doctoral dissertation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Young, N.D., Daly, E.J. An Evaluation of Prompting and Reinforcement for Training Visual Analysis Skills. J Behav Educ 25, 95–119 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-015-9234-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-015-9234-z