Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing Brief and Extended Wait-Time During Small Group Instruction for Children with Challenging Behavior

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This preliminary study compared brief (1 s) and extended (4 s) wait-time on response opportunities, academic responses, accuracy, and disruptive behavior of two children with challenging behavior during small group instruction. Brief wait-time increased children’s response opportunities, academic responses, and accuracy in comparison to extended wait-time. Though variable, brief wait-time also decreased children’s disruptive behavior. Findings differ from previous research, which found performance improvements with extended wait-time for children with moderate to profound cognitive disabilities. Limitations of the study and future research suggestions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, L. L., & Hammill, D. D. (1990). Behavior rating profile: An ecological approach to behavioral assessment. Austin, TX: Pro-ed, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnine, D. W. (1976). Effects of two teacher presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 199–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, M. T., Soraci, S., Goldman, A. L., & McIlvane, W. (1995). Visual search in unidimensional arrays: A comparison between subjects with and without mental retardation. Intelligence, 21, 175–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (1987). Applied behavior analysis. Columbus: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darch, C., & Gersten, R. (1985). The effects of teacher presentation rate and praise on LD students’ oral reading performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 295–303.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duker, P. C., Van Doeselaar, C., & Verstraten, A. (1993). The effect of response delay on correct responding to instructions during communicative gesture training. Education & Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 327–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, G., Clarke, S., Jackson, M., & Wright, S. (1995). Self-monitoring of classroom behaviors with students exhibiting emotional and behavioral challenges. School Psychology Quarterly, 10, 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, G., Dyer, K., & Koegel, R. L. (1983). Autistic self-stimulation and intertrial interval duration. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 194–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, K., Christian, W. P., & Luce, S. C. (1982). The role of response delay in improving the discrimination performance of autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 231–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, S., & Osborn, J. (1999). Language for Learning teacher’s guide. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, K. B., & Wehby, J. H. (2001) The effects of peer-assisted learning strategies on the beginning reading skills of young children with emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 26, 344–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. (2003). Looking in classrooms (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F. M., Cook, C. R., Crews, S. D., & Kern, L. (2004). Social skills training for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders: Validity considerations and future directions. Behavioral Disorders, 30, 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heward, W. L. (1994). Three “low-tech” strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction. In R. Gardiner III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 283–320). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauchak, D. K., Eggen, P., & Carter, C. (2002). Introduction to teaching: Becoming a professional. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, J. M. (2004). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single case designs for educational research. Boston: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., Dunlap, G., & Dyer, K. (1980). Intertrial interval duration and learning in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 91–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., O’Shea, L. J., & Dykes, M. K. (1987). Teacher wait-time: Performance of developmentally delayed and non-delayed young children. Education & Training in Mental Retardation, 22, 176–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, P. W., & Ross, L. E. (1975). Severely retarded children as impulsive responders: Improved performance with response delay. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 80, 133–138.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. R, Benner, G. J., Lane, K., & Smith, B. W. (2004). Academic achievement of K-12 students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 71, 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. S., Wilson, R., Maheady, L., & Sindelar, P. T. (2004). Educating students with behavior disorders (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. B. (1974). Wait-time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence on language, logic, and fate control. Part one. Wait-time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11, 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. B. (1987). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up. American Educator, 11, 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, C. H., Smith, E. S., & McLean, J. E. (1994). The effects of intertrial interval duration on sight-word learning rates in children with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 19, 98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, K. S., & Wehby, J. H. (2001). Exploring the relationship between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and the academic and behavioral outcomes of students with EBD: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. (1987). The role of wait time in higher cognitive level learning. Review of Educational Research, 57, 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tincani, M., Ernsbarger, S., Harrison, T. J., & Heward. W. L. (2005). Effects of two instructional paces on pre-K children’s participation rate, accuracy, and off-task behavior in the Language for Learning Program. Journal of Direct Instruction, 5, 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valcante, G., Roberson, W., Reid, W. R., & Wolking W. D. (1989). Effects of wait-time and intertrial interval durations on learning by children with multiple handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 43–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron-Soler, K. M., & Osborn, J. (2004). Language. In N. E. Marchand-Martella, T. A. Slocum, & R. C. Martella (Eds.), Introduction to Direct Instruction (pp. 66–99). Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Sue Germeroth and her staff for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matt Tincani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tincani, M., Crozier, S. Comparing Brief and Extended Wait-Time During Small Group Instruction for Children with Challenging Behavior. J Behav Educ 17, 79–92 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-008-9063-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-008-9063-4

Keywords

Navigation