Skip to main content
Log in

Depression, Confidence, and Decision: Evidence Against Depressive Realism

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examined how retrospective self-assessments of performance are affected by major depression. To test the validity of the depressive realism versus the selective processing hypotheses, aggregate posttest performance estimates (PTPEs) were obtained from clinically depressed patients and an age-matched comparison group across 4 decision tasks (object recognition, general knowledge, social judgment, and line-length judgment). As expected on the basis of previous findings, both groups were underconfident in their PTPEs, consistently underestimating the percentage of questions they had answered correctly. Contrary to depressive realism, and in partial support of the selective processing account, this underconfidence effect was not reduced but modestly exacerbated in the depressed patients. Further, whereas the PTPEs of the comparison group exceeded that expected on the basis of chance alone those of the depressed individuals did not. The results provide no support for the depressive realism account and suggest that negative biases contribute to metacognitive information processing in major depression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, L. Y., & Alloy, L. B. (1981). Depression, non-depression, and cognitive illusions: Reply. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 436–447.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ackermann, R., & DeRubeis, R. J. (1991). Is depressive realism real? Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 565–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albright, J. S., & Henderson, M. C. (1995). How real is depressive realism? A question of scales and standards. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 589–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 441–485.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alloy, L. B., & Ackerman, L. Y. (1988). Depressive realism: Four theoretical perspectives. In L. B. Alloy (Ed.), Cognitive process in depression (pp. 223–265). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., DSM-IV). Washington, DC: APA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test, revised version: A study with normal adults and adults with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42, 241–251.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. E., & Erbaugh, J. K. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, L. A., Koehler, D. J., Liberman, V., & Tversky, A. (1996). Overconfidence in probability and frequency judgments: A critical examination. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 212–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswik, E. (1943). Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review, 50, 255–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A., Beck, A. T., & Alford, B. A. (1999). Scientific foundations of cognitive theory and therapy of depression. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Macwhinny, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25, 257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colin, M. (1998). The character of mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. D., & Stankov, L. (1996). Age differences in the realism of confidence judgments: A calibration study using tests of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, K. S., & Pusch, D. (1995). A test of the depressive realism hypothesis in clinically depressed subjects. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 179–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykman, B. M., & Abramson, L. Y. (1989). Processing of ambiguous and unambiguous feedback by depressed and nondepressed college students: Schematic biases and their implications for depressive realism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 431–445.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1996). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Clinical Version (SCID-CV). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.

  • Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98, 506–528.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gotlib, I. H. (1981). Self-reinforcement and recall: Differential deficits in depressed and non-depressed psychiatric patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 521–530.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gotlib, I. H. (1983). Perception and recall of interpersonal feedback: Negative bias in depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 7, 399–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1992). The weighting of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 411–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaga, D. A. F., & Beck, A. T. (1995). Perspectives on depressive realism: Implications for cognitive theory of depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 41–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 23, 56–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, J. A., Moffoot, A. P. R., & O’Carroll, R. E. (1996). “Depressive realism” assessed via confidence in decision-making. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 1, 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T. J., & DiLorenzo, T. M. (1998). Social information processing biases in depressed and nondepressed college students. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 517–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., Hollon, S. D., Beck, A. T., Hammen, C. L., & Ingram, R. E. (1987). Issues and recommendations regarding use of the Beck Depression Inventory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, L. J., Ragin, A. B., & Harrow, M. (1995). Accuracy and bias in depressives judgements for self and other. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 505–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutstaal, W. (2003). Older adults encode—but do not always use—perceptual details: Intentional versus unintentional effects of detail on memory judgments. Psychological Science, 14, 189–193.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koutstaal, W., & Matthews, S. C. (2004). The relation between confidence and decision accuracy across task domains in older versus younger adults. Manuscript under revision.

  • Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Phillips, L. D. (1982). Calibration of subjective probabilities: The state of the art up to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 306–334). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKendree-Smith, N., & Scogin, F. (2000). Depressive realism: Effects of depression severity and interpretation time. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 1601–1608.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. J. (1996). Processing strategies used by disphoric individuals: Self-derogating, non-self-enhancing, or schematic? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 20, 213–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nierenberg, A. A., & DeCecco, L. M. (2001). Definitions of antidepressant treatment response, remission, nonresponse, partial response, and other relevant outcomes: A focus on treatment-resistant depression. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 62, 5–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pacini, R., Muir, F., & Epstein, S. (1998). Depressive realism from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1056–1068.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sniezek, J. A., Paese, P. W., & Switzer, F. S. (1990). The effect of choosing on confidence in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 264–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankov, L. (1998). Calibration curves, scatterplots and the distinction between general knowledge and perceptual tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 10, 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, E. R., Dodrill, C. L., & Johnson, N. (2001). Depressive cognition: A test of depressive realism versus negativity using general knowledge questions. The Journal of Psychology, 135, 583–602.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wilma Koutstaal.

Additional information

The results reported in this paper are based on an extension of the MSc dissertation of Tiffany Fu, conducted in partial fulfillment of the degree of MSc in Research Methods in Psychology, University of Reading, 2003

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fu, T., Koutstaal, W., Fu, C.H.Y. et al. Depression, Confidence, and Decision: Evidence Against Depressive Realism. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 27, 243–252 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-005-2404-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-005-2404-x

Key Words

Navigation