Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Kink, flow and retention properties of urinary catheters part 2: Novel design

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research has shown that all the current designs of urinary catheters based on natural latex or silicone rubber are susceptible to the major problems associated with their use—infection, encrustation and blockage. Research, to date, has focussed on the biological aspects of these complications; little research has been directed towards the contribution of the design or materials used in the manufacture of the catheters. The aim of the current study was to evaluate a totally new concept in catheter design based on nylon braid encased in a polyurethane matrix. Novel prototypes were tested using a range of established protocols to assess their flow properties, resistance to kinking and retention properties. The results were compared to those for the conventional latex and silicone based catheters currently in clinical use. The indications were that the new designs had superior flow properties and equivalent retention properties to the all-silicone catheters. Following further modification they also had superior resistance to kinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. WINSON, British J. Nursing 6 (1997) 1229.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. I. POMFRET, Nursing Standard 14 (2000) 46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. N. SABBUBA, G. HUGHES and D. J. STICKLER, BJU Intl. 89 (2002) 55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. N. S. MORRIS, D. J. STICKLER and R. J. C. MCLEAN, World J. Urol 17 (1999) 345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. N. S. MORRIS and D. J. STICKLER, Urol Res. 26 (1998) 275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. D. J. STICKLER and N. S. MORRIS, Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 17 (1998) 649.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. D. J. STICKLER and G. HUGHES, ibid. 18 (1999) 206.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. TALJA, A. KORPELA and K. JARVI, Br. J. Urol 66(1990) 652.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. D. DENSTEDT, T. A. WOLLIN and G. REID, J. Endourol. 12 (1998) 493.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. L. L. SULLIVAN, B. W. STEINERT, et al., ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings 2 (1995) 2168.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. L. LAWRENCE and I. G. TURNER, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 17(2) (2006) 147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoop Stress (Barlow's Formula).http://www.tsi.dot.gov/divisions/pipeline/Glossary/h/hoop_stress.htm

  13. D. S. JONES, C. P. GARVIN and S. P. GORMAN, Biomater. 25 (2004) 1421.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. P. HO, N. NAKABAYASHI, Y. IWASAKI, et al., Biomater. 24 (2003) 5121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. G. Turner.

Additional information

Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lawrence, E.L., Turner, I.G. Kink, flow and retention properties of urinary catheters part 2: Novel design. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 17, 153–159 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-6819-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-6819-z

Keywords

Navigation