Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

3D gel printing of porous calcium silicate scaffold for bone tissue engineering

  • Materials for life sciences
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Potential porous calcium silicate (CaSiO3) scaffolds for bone tissue engineering were successfully prepared by 3D gel printing technology. The average particle size of CaSiO3 powder is about 5.119 μm. The CaSiO3 slurry prepared for printing had been exhibited shear-thinning properties, and the maximum solid loading of the slurry was 72 wt%. The green scaffolds were sintered at 1150 °C for 4 h after degreasing at 250 °C for 3 h, 420 °C for 9 h, and 660 °C for 3 h, respectively. The sintered scaffolds have well-distributed designed voids and microporous. The shrinkage in length, width, and height is 12.29 ± 0.20%, 12.43 ± 0.17%, 13.15 ± 0.19%, respectively. The porosity of the sintered scaffold is approximately 62%, and the compressive strength is about 16.52 MPa, which is equivalent to the strength of human cancellous bone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hench LL, Thompson I (2010) Twenty-first century challenges for biomaterials. J R Soc Interface 7(Suppl 4):S379–S391

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chu PK, Tang BY, Wang LP, Wang XF, Wang SY, Huang N (2001) Third-generation plasma immersion ion implanter for biomedical materials and research. Rev Sci Instrum 72:1660–1665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yeong WY, Chua CK, Leong KF, Chandrasekaran M (2004) Rapid prototyping in tissue engineering: challenges and potential. Trends Biotechnol 22:643–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reena A, Bhatt MD, Tamara D, Rozental MD (2012) Bone graft substitutes. Hand Clin 4:457–468

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yang J, Cai H, Lv J, Zhang K, Leng H, Sun C (2014) In vivo study of a self-stabilizing artificial vertebral body fabricated by electron beam melting. Spine 39:E486–E492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu M, Zhai D, Chang J, Wu C (2014) In vitro assessment of three-dimensionally plotted nagelschmidtite bioceramic scaffolds with varied macropore morphologies. Acta Biomater 10:463–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hollister SJ (2005) Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 4:518–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kokubo T (1991) Bioactive glass ceramics: properties and applications. Biomaterials 12:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu C, Chang J (2010) Degradation, bioactivity, and cytocompatibility of diopside, akermanite, and bredigite ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 83B:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu S, Lin K, Wang Z, Chang J, Wang L, Lu J (2008) Reconstruction of calvarial defect of rabbits using porous calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials 29:2588–2596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwarz K, Milne DB (1972) Growth-promoting effects of silicon in rats. Nature 239:333–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Duan B, Wang M, Zhou WY, Cheung WL, Li ZY, Lu WW (2010) Three-dimensional nanocomposite scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 6:4495–4505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tong HW, Wang M (2010) Electrospinning of fibrous polymer scaffolds using positive voltage or negative voltage: a comparative study. Biomed Mater 5:054110–054124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guarino V, Causa F, Taddei P, Di FM, Ciapetti G, Martini D (2008) Polylactic acid fibre-reinforced polycaprolactone scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 29:3662–3670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fan H, Tao H, Wu Y, Hu Y, Yan Y, Luo Z (2010) Tgf-β3 immobilized plga-gelatin/chondroitin sulfate/hyaluronic acid hybrid scaffold for cartilage regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 95:982–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ren X, Shao H, Lin T, Zheng H (2016) 3D gel-printing—an additive manufacturing method for producing complex shape parts. Mater Des 101:80–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shao H, Zhao D, Lin T, He J, Wu J (2017) 3D gel-printing of zirconia ceramic parts. Ceram Int 43:13938–13942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shao H, He J, Lin T, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Liu S (2019) 3D gel-printing of hydroxyapatite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Ceram Int 45:1163–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Projects of the People’s Liberation Army (No. BWS17J036).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huiping Shao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Shao, H., Lin, T. et al. 3D gel printing of porous calcium silicate scaffold for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci 54, 10430–10436 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03626-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03626-1

Navigation