Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Synthesis of N-doped and non-doped partially oxidised graphene membranes supported over ceramic materials

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Graphene has a great potential to substitute other amorphous carbon materials and has been widely used in many water and wastewater treatments such as purification or photocatalytic processes. Graphene powder with different degrees of oxidation was synthesised and subsequently used to prepare supported membranes. Ceramic porous materials were chosen as membrane support due to the robustness and long life required in a likely application. Ultrathin membranes (7–9 µm) were successfully prepared through vacuum filtration of highly oxidised graphene or reduced graphene oxide solutions (1 mg ml−1). The influence of depositing different amounts of membrane precursor was extensively studied (0.003–0.037 mg cm−2); above 0.037 mg cm−2, drying-related shrinkage problems are detected. Moreover, the ceramic support pore size (SPS) (0.008–0.08 µm) shows little impact in terms of the overall membrane flux resistance, and the deposited graphene layer usually governs the membrane permeation. Finally, long-term filtration experiments were also performed for weeks without substantial variation of the membrane structure or permeation (≤2 %), which is demanded in most conventional water treatments. Overall, the addition of partially oxidised graphene to conventional ceramic membranes greatly decreases their electrical resistivity (~2.8 × 10−5 Ω m), opening up the possibility of being employed for many environmental purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV et al (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306:666–669. doi:10.1126/science.1102896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321:385–388. doi:10.1126/science.1157996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ning J, Wang D, Zhang C et al (2015) Electrical and optical properties of layer-stacked graphene transparent electrodes using self-supporting transfer method. Synth Met 203:215–220. doi:10.1016/j.synthmet.2015.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang S-H, Fang T-H, Hong Z-H, Chuang C-H (2013) Mechanical properties of free-standing graphene oxide. Diam Relat Mater 38:73–78. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2013.06.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jagiello J, Judek J, Zdrojek M et al (2014) Production of graphene composite by direct graphite exfoliation with chitosan. Mater Chem Phys 148:507–511. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.09.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu F, Seo TS (2010) Large scale synthetic method for free standing graphene film and graphene sponges. In: 10th IEEE Int. Conference Nanotechnol. IEEE, pp 696–699

  7. Campos-Delgado J, Botello-Méndez AR, Algara-Siller G et al (2013) CVD synthesis of mono- and few-layer graphene using alcohols at low hydrogen concentration and atmospheric pressure. Chem Phys Lett 584:142–146. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2013.08.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Radchenko TM, Shylau AA, Zozoulenko IV (2014) Conductivity of epitaxial and CVD graphene with correlated line defects. Solid State Commun 195:88–94. doi:10.1016/j.ssc.2014.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu B, Tuncer HM, Katsounaros A et al (2014) Microwave absorption and radiation from large-area multilayer CVD graphene. Carbon 77:814–822. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2014.05.086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grennberg H, Jansson U (2012) Advanced functional materials. Sci Technol Mol Condens Matter Biol Syst. doi:10.1016/B978-0-44-453681-5.00005-4

    Google Scholar 

  11. Whitener KE, Sheehan PE (2014) Graphene synthesis. Diam Relat Mater 46:25–34. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2014.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Potts JR, Dreyer DR, Bielawski CW, Ruoff RS (2011) Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites. Polymer (Guildf) 52:5–25. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2010.11.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao C, Xing L, Xiang J et al (2014) Formation of uniform reduced graphene oxide films on modified PET substrates using drop-casting method. Particuology 17:66–73. doi:10.1016/j.partic.2014.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. William S, Hummers J, Offeman RE (1958) Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc 80:1339. doi:10.1021/ja01539a017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nekahi A, Marashi PH, Haghshenas D (2014) Transparent conductive thin film of ultra large reduced graphene oxide monolayers. Appl Surf Sci 295:59–65. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu Y, Bai H, Lu G et al (2008) Flexible graphene films via the filtration of water-soluble noncovalent functionalized graphene sheets. J Am Chem Soc 130:5856–5857. doi:10.1021/ja800745y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen C-M, Huang J-Q, Zhang Q et al (2012) Annealing a graphene oxide film to produce a free standing high conductive graphene film. Carbon 50:659–667. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2011.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Noerochim L, Wang JZ, Wexler D et al (2013) Rapid synthesis of free-standing MoO3/Graphene films by the microwave hydrothermal method as cathode for bendable lithium batteries. J Power Sources 228:198–205. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wei Z, Barlow DE, Sheehan PE (2008) The assembly of single-layer graphene oxide and graphene using molecular templates. Nano Lett 8:3141–3145. doi:10.1021/nl801301a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dolbin AV, Khlistyuck MV, Esel’son VB et al (2015) The effect of the thermal reduction temperature on the structure and sorption capacity of reduced graphene oxide materials. Appl Surf Sci. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.11.167

    Google Scholar 

  21. Du X, Zhou C, Liu H-Y et al (2013) Facile chemical synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene sheets and their electrochemical capacitance. J Power Sources 241:460–466. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bikkarolla SK, Papakonstantinou P (2015) CuCo2O4 nanoparticles on nitrogenated graphene as highly efficient oxygen evolution catalyst. J Power Sources 281:243–251. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li H, Song Z, Zhang X et al (2013) Ultrathin, molecular-sieving graphene oxide membranes for selective hydrogen separation. Science 342(80):95–98. doi:10.1126/science.1236686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu R, Arabale G, Kim J et al (2014) Graphene oxide membrane for liquid phase organic molecular separation. Carbon 77:933–938. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2014.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li H, Song Z, Zhang X et al (2013) Ultrathin, molecular-sieving graphene oxide membranes for selective hydrogen separation. Science 342:95–98. doi:10.1126/science.1236686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Eda G, Chhowalla M (2010) Chemically derived graphene oxide: towards large-area thin-film electronics and optoelectronics. Adv Mater 22:2392–2415. doi:10.1002/adma.200903689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Paul DR (2012) Creating new types of carbon-based membranes. Sci 335:413–414. doi:10.1126/science.1216923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Geim AK, Novoselov KSS (2007) The rise of graphene. Nat Mater 6:183–191. doi:10.1038/nmat1849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen J, Guo Y, Huang L et al (2014) Controllable fabrication of ultrathin free-standing graphene films. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 372:20130017. doi:10.1098/rsta.2013.0017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zheng Q, Li Z, Yang J, Kim J (2014) Graphene oxide-based transparent conductive films. Prog Mater Sci 64:200–247. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zheng Q, Shi L, Yang J (2012) Langmuir–Blodgett assembly of ultra-large graphene oxide films for transparent electrodes. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 22:2504–2511. doi:10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61492-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu Y, Long G, Huang L et al (2010) Polymer photovoltaic devices with transparent graphene electrodes produced by spin-casting. Carbon 48:3308–3311. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2010.05.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chowdhury S, Balasubramanian R (2014) Graphene/semiconductor nanocomposites (GSNs) for heterogeneous photocatalytic decolorization of wastewaters contaminated with synthetic dyes: a review. Appl Catal B 160–161:307–324. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.05.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Berdova M, Perros AP, Kim W et al (2014) Exceptionally strong and robust millimeter-scale graphene-alumina composite membranes. Nanotechnology 25:355701. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/25/35/355701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li N, Yang G, Sun Y et al (2015) Free-standing and transparent graphene membrane of polyhedron box-shaped basic building units directly grown using a NaCl template for flexible transparent and stretchable solid-state supercapacitors. Nano Lett 15:3195–3203. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Feng X, Chen W, Yan L (2015) Free-standing dried foam films of graphene oxide for humidity sensing. Sensors Actuators B Chem 215:316–322. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2015.03.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dikin DA, Stankovich S, Zimney EJ et al (2007) Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper. Nature 448:457–460. doi:10.1038/nature06016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rana K, Singh J, Lee JT et al (2014) Highly conductive freestanding graphene films as anode current collectors for flexible lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:11158–11166. doi:10.1021/am500996c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu Y, Zhang D, Shang Y, Liu Y (2014) A simple route to prepare free-standing graphene thin film for high-performance flexible electrode materials. RSC Adv 4:30422. doi:10.1039/C4RA04031G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hu X, Yu Y, Zhou J et al (2015) The improved oil/water separation performance of graphene oxide modified Al2O3 microfiltration membrane. J Memb Sci 476:200–204. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Aba NFD, Chong JY, Wang B et al (2015) Graphene oxide membranes on ceramic hollow fibers—Microstructural stability and nanofiltration performance. J Memb Sci 484:87–94. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Almandoz MC, Pagliero CL, Ochoa NA, Marchese J (2015) Composite ceramic membranes from natural aluminosilicates for microfiltration applications. Ceram Int 41:5621–5633. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.12.144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hatori H, Takagi H, Yamada Y (2004) Gas separation properties of molecular sieving carbon membranes with nanopore channels. Carbon 42:1169–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen X, Dai Y, Wang X et al (2015) Synthesis and characterization of Ag3PO4 immobilized with graphene oxide (GO) for enhanced photocatalytic activity and stability over 2,4-dichlorophenol under visible light irradiation. J Hazard Mater 292:9–18. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.01.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim H-S, Takizawa S, Ohgaki S (2007) Application of microfiltration systems coupled with powdered activated carbon to river water treatment. Wastewater Reclam Reuse Sustain 202:271–277. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2005.12.064

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mezohegyi G, Bengoa C, Stuber F et al (2008) Novel bioreactor design for decolourisation of azo dye effluents. Chem Eng J 143:293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Fu X, Yang H, Lu G et al (2015) Improved performance of surface functionalized TiO2/activated carbon for adsorption–photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) in aqueous solution. Mater Sci Semicond Process 39:362–370. doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2015.05.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen J, Zhang F, Zhao Y-L et al (2016) Facile synthesis of CdS/C core–shell nanospheres with ultrathin carbon layer for enhanced photocatalytic properties and stability. Appl Surf Sci 362:126–131. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.11.197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Fagan R, McCormack DE, Dionysiou DD, Pillai SC (2015) A review of solar and visible light active TiO2 photocatalysis for treating bacteria, cyanotoxins and contaminants of emerging concern. Mater Sci Semicond Process 42:2–14. doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2015.07.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mezohegyi G, Gonçalves F, Órfão JJM et al (2010) Tailored activated carbons as catalysts in biodecolourisation of textile azo dyes. Appl Catal B 94:179–185. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sun L, Yu H, Fugetsu B (2012) Graphene oxide adsorption enhanced by in situ reduction with sodium hydrosulfite to remove acridine orange from aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater 203–204:101–110. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Mezohegyi G, van der Zee FP, Font J et al (2012) Towards advanced aqueous dye removal processes: a short review on the versatile role of activated carbon. J Environ Manag 102:148–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Shao Y, Zhang S, Engelhard MH et al (2010) Nitrogen-doped graphene and its electrochemical applications. J Mater Chem 20:7491. doi:10.1039/c0jm00782j

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Bikkarolla SK, Yu F, Zhou W et al (2014) A three-dimensional Mn3O4 network supported on a nitrogenated graphene electrocatalyst for efficient oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline media. J Mater Chem A 2:14493–14501. doi:10.1039/C4TA02279C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Mobarakabad P, Moghadassi AR, Hosseini SM (2015) Fabrication and characterization of poly(phenylene ether-ether sulfone) based nanofiltration membranes modified by titanium dioxide nanoparticles for water desalination. Desalination 365:227–233. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2015.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Centeno A, Rocha VG, Alonso B et al (2013) Graphene for tough and electroconductive alumina ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 33:3201–3210. doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ganguly A, Sharma S, Papakonstantinou P, Hamilton J (2011) Probing the thermal deoxygenation of graphene oxide using high resolution in situ X-ray based spectroscopies. J Phys Chem C 115:17009–17019. doi:10.1021/jp203741y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Bikkarolla SK, Cumpson P, Joseph P, Papakonstantinou P (2014) Oxygen reduction reaction by electrochemically reduced graphene oxide. Faraday Discuss 173:415–428. doi:10.1039/c4fd00088a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Long D, Li W, Ling L et al (2010) Preparation of nitrogen-doped graphene sheets by a combined chemical and hydrothermal reduction of graphene oxide. Langmuir 26:16096–16102. doi:10.1021/la102425a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Seven O, Dindar B, Aydemir S et al (2004) Solar photocatalytic disinfection of a group of bacteria and fungi aqueous suspensions with TiO2, ZnO and Sahara desert dust. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 165:103–107. doi:10.1016/j.jphotochem.2004.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Pei S, Cheng HM (2012) The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon 50:3210–3228. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Ishak A, Rusop M (2014) Electrical Properties Of Intrinsic Amorphous Carbon Films From Ethanol Precursor. Int J Technol Enhanc Emerg Eng Res 3:305–308

    Google Scholar 

  63. Oh YJ, Yoo JJ, Kim YI et al (2014) Oxygen functional groups and electrochemical capacitive behavior of incompletely reduced graphene oxides as a thin-film electrode of supercapacitor. Electrochim Acta 116:118–128. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2013.11.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Wang L, Zhao J, Bai S et al (2014) Significant catalytic effects induced by the electronic interactions between carboxyl and hydroxyl group modified carbon nanotube supports and vanadium species for NO reduction with NH3 at low temperature. Chem Eng J 254:399–409. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2014.05.096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Chen L, Feng H, Xie Z, Sun F (2014) “Disc-point” mass transfer Constructal optimizations with Darcy and Hagen–Poiseuille flows in porous media. Appl Math Model 38:1288–1299. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2013.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Fan L, Harris JL, Roddick FA, Booker NA (2001) Influence of the characteristics of natural organic matter on the fouling of microfiltration membranes. Water Res 35:4455–4463. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00183-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad is gratefully thanked for providing the financial support through the Grants (CTM2011-23069 and CTM2015-67970) and funding the doctoral scholarship (BES-2012-059675). Some of the authors are recognised by the Comissionat per a Universitats i Recerca del DIUE de la Generalitat de Catalunya (2014 SGR 1065) and supported by the Universitat Rovira i Virgili (2014PFR-URV-B2-35). Support from the Department of Education and Learning (DEL) in Northern Ireland and the Ulster University in the form of two PhD studentships for JB and SKB is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departament d’Enginyeria Química, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Av. Països Catalans 26, 43007, Tarragona, Spain

    A. Giménez-Pérez, C. Bengoa, F. Stüber, A. Fabregat & J. Font

  2. School of Engineering, Engineering Research Institute, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, BT37 0QB, UK

    S. K. Bikkarolla, J. Benson & P. Papakonstantinou

  3. Departament d’Enginyeria Química, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, EUPVG, Av. Víctor Balaguer, s/n, 08800, Vilanova i la Geltrú, Spain

    A. Fortuny

Authors
  1. A. Giménez-Pérez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. K. Bikkarolla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Benson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Bengoa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. Stüber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. Fortuny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A. Fabregat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. J. Font
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. P. Papakonstantinou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to J. Font or P. Papakonstantinou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giménez-Pérez, A., Bikkarolla, S.K., Benson, J. et al. Synthesis of N-doped and non-doped partially oxidised graphene membranes supported over ceramic materials. J Mater Sci 51, 8346–8360 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0075-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0075-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation