Skip to main content
Log in

Interface modification of clay and graphene platelets reinforced epoxy nanocomposites: a comparative study

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interface between the matrix phase and dispersed phase of a composite plays a critical role in influencing its properties. However, the intricate mechanisms of interface are not fully understood, and polymer nanocomposites are no exception. This study compares the fabrication, morphology, and mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy nanocomposites tuned by clay layers (denoted as m-clay) and graphene platelets (denoted as m-GP). It was found that a chemical modification, layer expansion and dispersion of filler within the epoxy matrix resulted in an improved interface between the filler material and epoxy matrix. This was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and transmission electron microscope. The enhanced interface led to improved mechanical properties (i.e. stiffness modulus, fracture toughness) and higher glass transition temperatures (T g) compared with neat epoxy. At 4 wt% m-GP, the critical strain energy release rate G 1c of neat epoxy improved by 240 % from 179.1 to 608.6 J/m2 and T g increased from 93.7 to 106.4 °C. In contrast to m-clay, which at 4 wt%, only improved the G 1c by 45 % and T g by 7.1 %. The higher level of improvement offered by m-GP is attributed to the strong interaction of graphene sheets with epoxy because the covalent bonds between the carbon atoms of graphene sheets are much stronger than silicon-based clay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Njuguna J, Pielichowski K, Alcock JR (2007) Epoxy-based fibre reinforced nanocomposites. Adv Eng Mater 9:835–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker O, Simon GP (2005) Epoxy layered silicate nanocomposites. Adv Polym Sci 179:29–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC (2003) Mechanical and fracture properties of epoxy/inorganic micro- and nano-composites. J Mater Sci Lett 22:1439–1441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma J, La LTB, Zaman I et al (2011) Fabrication, structure and properties of epoxy/metal nanocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng 296:465–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Amdouni N, Sautereau H, Gerard JF (1992) Epoxy composites based on glass-beads. 2. Mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 46:1723–1735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ma J, Mo M-S, Du X-S, Dai S-R, Luck I (2008) Study of epoxy toughened by in situ formed rubber nanoparticles. J Appl Polym Sci 110:304–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kinloch A, Mohammed RD, Taylor AC, Eager C, Sprenger S, Egan D (2006) The effect of silica nano particles and rubber particles on the toughness of multiphase thermosetting epoxy polymers. J Mater Sci 41:1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ozturk A, Kaynak C, Tincer T (2001) Effects of liquid rubber modification on the behaviour of epoxy resin. Eur Polym J 37:2353–2363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Choi J, Yee AF, Laine RM (2004) Toughening of cubic silsesquioxane epoxy nanocomposites using core shell rubber particles; a three component hybrid system. Macromolecules 37:3267–3276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jia XT, Campos-Delgado J, Terrones M, Meunier V, Dresselhaus MS (2011) Graphene edges: a review of their fabrication and characterization. Nanoscale 3:86–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goettler LA, Lee KY, Thakkar H (2007) Layered silicate reinforced polymer nanocomposites: development and applications. Polym Rev 47:291–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ratna D, Manoj N, Varley R, Singh Raman R, Simon GP (2003) Clay reinforced epoxy nanocomposites. Polym Int 52:1403–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zaman I, Manshoor B, Khalid A, Araby S (2014) From clay to graphene for polymer nanocomposites—a survey. J Polym Res 21:429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Morvan M, Espinat D, Lambard J, Zemb T (2002) Ultrasmall-angle and small-angle X-ray scattering of smectite clay suspensions. Colloids Surf A 82:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee C, Wei XD, Kysar JW, Hone J (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321:385–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma J, Xu J, Ren JH, Yu ZZ, Mai YW (2003) A new approach to polymer/montmorillonite nanocomposites. Polymer 44:4619–4624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zaman I, Phan TT, Kuan H-C et al (2011) Epoxy/graphene platelets nanocomposites with two levels of interface strength. Polymer 52:1603–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zaman I, Le Q, Kuan HC et al (2011) Interface-tuned epoxy/clay nanocomposites. Polymer 52:497–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zaman I, Kuan HC, Meng Q et al (2012) A facile approach to chemically modified graphene and its polymer nanocomposites. Adv Funct Mater 22:2735–2743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Araby S, Zaman I, Meng Q et al (2013) Melt compounding with graphene to develop functional, high-performance elastomers. Nanotechnology 24:165601–165614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Messersmith PB, Giannelis EP (1994) Synthesis and characterisation of layered silicate–epoxy nanocomposites. Chem Mater 6:1719–1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller SG, Bauer JL, Maryanski MJ et al (2010) Characterization of epoxy functionalized graphite nanoparticles and the physical properties of epoxy matrix nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 70:1120–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi JS, Lim ST, Choi HJ, Pozsgay A, Szazdi L (2006) Effect of interfacial interaction on the structure and rheological properties of polyamide-6/clay nanocomposites. Compos Interfaces 13:773–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gorga RE, Lau KKS, Gleason KK, Cohen RE (2006) The importance of interfacial design at the carbon nanotube/polymer composite interface. J Appl Polym Sci 102:1413–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ma J, Meng Q, Michelmore A et al (2013) Covalently bonded interfaces for polymer/graphene composites. J Mater Chem A 1:4255–4264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ma J, Meng Q, Zaman I et al (2014) Development of polymer composites using modified, high-structural integrity graphene platelets. Compos Sci Technol 91:82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cravotto G, Cintas P (2010) Sonication-assisted fabrication and post-synthetic modifications of graphene-like materials. Chem Eur J 16:5246–5259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Meng Q, Zaman I, Hannam JR et al (2011) Improvement of adhesive toughness measurement. Polym Test 30:243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Katti KS, Sikdar D, Katti DR, Ghosh P, Verma D (2006) Molecular interactions in intercalated organically modified clay and clay–polycaprolactam nanocomposites: experiments and modeling. Polymer 47:403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Madejova J (2003) Vib Spectrosc 31:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McMurry J (2004) Organic chemistry. Brooks/Cole, California

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kuan HC, Chuang WP, Ma CCM, Chiang CL, Wu HL (2005) Synthesis and characterization of a clay/waterborne polyurethane nanocomposite. J Mater Sci 40:179–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang K, Wang L, Wang F, Wang G, Li Z (2004) Preparation and characterization of modified-clay-reinforced and toughened epoxy–resin nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 91:2649–2652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gass MH, Bangert U, Bleloch AL, Wang P, Nair RR, Geim AK (2008) Free-standing graphene at atomic resolution. Nat Nanotechnol 3:676–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kornmann X, Lindberg H (2001) Synthesis of epoxy–clay nanocomposites: influence of the nature of the curing agent on structure. Polymer 42:4493–4499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Le QH, Kuan H-C, Dai J-B, Zaman I, Luong L, Ma J (2010) Structure–property relations of 55 nm particle-toughened epoxy. Polymer 51:4867–4879

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I.Z. thanks Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia and Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia for the award of scholarship. Jeffamine was kindly provided courtesy of Huntsman (Singapore). The authors thank B Wade, L Waterhouse and J Terlet for technical support at Adelaide Microscopy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Izzuddin Zaman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zaman, I., Manshoor, B., Khalid, A. et al. Interface modification of clay and graphene platelets reinforced epoxy nanocomposites: a comparative study. J Mater Sci 49, 5856–5865 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8296-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8296-y

Keywords

Navigation